Chapitre 4. L’accident du travail chez soi.

Delphine Ronet-Yague
{"title":"Chapitre 4. L’accident du travail chez soi.","authors":"Delphine Ronet-Yague","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The widespread use of teleworking during the health crisis reduced the flow of occupational accident claims by 20%. This applies to commuting accidents, as well as claims related to &#171;&#160;immediate&#160;&#187; or &#8220;deferred&#8221; risks (Rapp. annuel 2020 de l&#8217;Assurance maladie - Risques professionnels&#160;: El&#233;ments statistiques et financiers, d&#233;c. 2021, p. 2 and 113). On the basis of these figures, working at home could be analyzed as a means of preventing occupational risks and improving workers&#8217; health. In reality, however, these figures should not obscure the fact that telecommuting is a major occupational hazard. This is all the more the case given that, while telecommuting was not very widespread before the pandemic, it is now popular with employees and is being developed by many companies as a source of productivity (Rapp. CNP, May 16 2022). We therefore need to keep a close eye on the development of workplace accident legislation in this area, its adaptability to the specific claims experience of teleworkers and its perfectibility, not forgetting the thorny question of the possible recognition of the employer&#8217;s inexcusable fault in the event of the accident being covered by professional legislation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73577,"journal":{"name":"Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The widespread use of teleworking during the health crisis reduced the flow of occupational accident claims by 20%. This applies to commuting accidents, as well as claims related to « immediate » or “deferred” risks (Rapp. annuel 2020 de l’Assurance maladie - Risques professionnels : Eléments statistiques et financiers, déc. 2021, p. 2 and 113). On the basis of these figures, working at home could be analyzed as a means of preventing occupational risks and improving workers’ health. In reality, however, these figures should not obscure the fact that telecommuting is a major occupational hazard. This is all the more the case given that, while telecommuting was not very widespread before the pandemic, it is now popular with employees and is being developed by many companies as a source of productivity (Rapp. CNP, May 16 2022). We therefore need to keep a close eye on the development of workplace accident legislation in this area, its adaptability to the specific claims experience of teleworkers and its perfectibility, not forgetting the thorny question of the possible recognition of the employer’s inexcusable fault in the event of the accident being covered by professional legislation.

第 4 章 家庭事故家庭事故
在健康危机期间,远程办公的广泛使用使工伤事故索赔减少了 20%。这适用于通勤事故,以及与« 即时 »或“延迟”风险有关的索赔(Rapp. annuel 2020 de l’Assurance maladie - Risques professionnels :Eléments statistiques et financiers, déc.2021 年,第 2 页和第 113 页)。根据这些数字,可以分析出在家工作是预防职业风险和改善工人健康的一种手段。但实际上,这些数字不应掩盖电子通勤是一种重大职业危害的事实。尽管远程办公在大流行病之前并不普遍,但现在却受到了员工的欢迎,许多公司都将其作为提高生产力的一种手段(Rapp. CNP,2022 年 5 月 16 日)。因此,我们需要密切关注该领域工伤事故立法的发展,关注其对远程办公人员特殊索赔经历的适应性及其完善性,同时也不要忘记一个棘手的问题,即在专业立法涵盖事故的情况下,雇主不可原谅的过失是否可能得到承认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信