Analgesic Efficacy of Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Positioning During Spinal Anesthesia in Patients with Femur Fractures.

Q4 Medicine
Kathmandu University Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-04-01
A Jha, S Khatiwada, K Pokharel, A Ghimire, S N Singh, J N Prasad
{"title":"Analgesic Efficacy of Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Positioning During Spinal Anesthesia in Patients with Femur Fractures.","authors":"A Jha, S Khatiwada, K Pokharel, A Ghimire, S N Singh, J N Prasad","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Positioning patients with femur fractures for spinal anesthesia is associated with excruciating pain. Fascia iliaca compartment block has the potential to block all nerves supplying the femur and therefore may provide effective analgesia during positioning these patients for spinal anesthesia. Objective To assess the analgesic efficacy of Fascia iliaca compartment block, during positioning patients with femur fracture for spinal anesthesia. We also assessed the duration of analgesia and the requirement for rescue analgesics in the postoperative period. Method Seventy adult patients with fracture femurs were randomly divided into two equal groups (A and B). Patients in both groups received fentanyl one mcg/kg intravenously, 20 minutes before positioning them for spinal anesthesia. Patients of group B additionally, received ultrasound-guided Fascia iliaca compartment block with 40 ml of 0.25% Ropivacaine, immediately after intravenous fentanyl. Numerical rating score (0-10) was used for the assessment of pain at five, 10, and 20 minutes after the block and immediately after positioning patients for spinal anesthesia. Result Immediately after positioning patients for spinal anesthesia, the numerical rating score of pain was 5.06±1.5 in group A and 2.49±1.2 in group B (p<0.001). The duration of analgesia was 799.7±62.1 minutes in group B and 314.65±118.9 minutes in group A (p<0.001). One (2.8%) patient of group B and 18(51.4%) patients of group A required rescue analgesics within four to twelve hours in the postoperative period (p=0.001). In group A, seven patients were satisfied with the analgesia technique while in group B, 17 were satisfied and eight patients were strongly satisfied (p<0.001). Conclusion Ultrasound-guided Fascia iliaca compartment block is effective in reducing pain during positioning patients with femur fractures for spinal anesthesia. Patients receiving this block had a prolonged duration of analgesia, required lesser analgesics, and were more satisfied in the postoperative period as compared to patients not receiving the block.</p>","PeriodicalId":35493,"journal":{"name":"Kathmandu University Medical Journal","volume":"21 82","pages":"133-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kathmandu University Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Positioning patients with femur fractures for spinal anesthesia is associated with excruciating pain. Fascia iliaca compartment block has the potential to block all nerves supplying the femur and therefore may provide effective analgesia during positioning these patients for spinal anesthesia. Objective To assess the analgesic efficacy of Fascia iliaca compartment block, during positioning patients with femur fracture for spinal anesthesia. We also assessed the duration of analgesia and the requirement for rescue analgesics in the postoperative period. Method Seventy adult patients with fracture femurs were randomly divided into two equal groups (A and B). Patients in both groups received fentanyl one mcg/kg intravenously, 20 minutes before positioning them for spinal anesthesia. Patients of group B additionally, received ultrasound-guided Fascia iliaca compartment block with 40 ml of 0.25% Ropivacaine, immediately after intravenous fentanyl. Numerical rating score (0-10) was used for the assessment of pain at five, 10, and 20 minutes after the block and immediately after positioning patients for spinal anesthesia. Result Immediately after positioning patients for spinal anesthesia, the numerical rating score of pain was 5.06±1.5 in group A and 2.49±1.2 in group B (p<0.001). The duration of analgesia was 799.7±62.1 minutes in group B and 314.65±118.9 minutes in group A (p<0.001). One (2.8%) patient of group B and 18(51.4%) patients of group A required rescue analgesics within four to twelve hours in the postoperative period (p=0.001). In group A, seven patients were satisfied with the analgesia technique while in group B, 17 were satisfied and eight patients were strongly satisfied (p<0.001). Conclusion Ultrasound-guided Fascia iliaca compartment block is effective in reducing pain during positioning patients with femur fractures for spinal anesthesia. Patients receiving this block had a prolonged duration of analgesia, required lesser analgesics, and were more satisfied in the postoperative period as compared to patients not receiving the block.

股骨骨折患者脊髓麻醉期间使用髂筋膜隔室阻滞定位的镇痛效果。
背景股骨骨折患者在进行脊髓麻醉定位时会感到剧烈疼痛。髂筋膜室阻滞可阻滞供应股骨的所有神经,因此可在对这些患者进行脊髓麻醉定位时提供有效的镇痛。目的 评估髂筋膜室阻滞对股骨骨折患者进行脊髓麻醉定位时的镇痛效果。我们还评估了镇痛持续时间和术后对镇痛药的需求。方法 将 70 名成年股骨骨折患者随机分为两组(A 组和 B 组)。两组患者在进行脊髓麻醉前 20 分钟静脉注射芬太尼 1 毫微克/千克。此外,B 组患者在静脉注射芬太尼后,立即在超声引导下接受 40 毫升 0.25% 罗哌卡因的髂筋膜室阻滞。在阻滞后 5 分钟、10 分钟和 20 分钟,以及为脊髓麻醉患者定位后立即对疼痛进行数字评分(0-10)。结果 A 组患者在定位脊髓麻醉后立即出现的疼痛数值评分为(5.06±1.5)分,B 组为(2.49±1.2)分(P<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kathmandu University Medical Journal
Kathmandu University Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信