Outcomes of Megaprosthesis ‎Reconstruction for the Salvage of ‎Failed Osteoarticular Allograft ‎‎Around the Knee implanted before ‎Skeletal Maturity in Primary Bone ‎Sarcoma: A Case-Series.

IF 1.2 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Khodamorad Jamshidi, Wael Ammar, Khalil Kargar Shooroki, Alireza Mirzaei
{"title":"Outcomes of Megaprosthesis ‎Reconstruction for the Salvage of ‎Failed Osteoarticular Allograft ‎‎Around the Knee implanted before ‎Skeletal Maturity in Primary Bone ‎Sarcoma: A Case-Series.","authors":"Khodamorad Jamshidi, Wael Ammar, Khalil Kargar Shooroki, Alireza Mirzaei","doi":"10.22038/ABJS.2023.74212.3434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Functional expectations following the salvage of a failed osteoarticular allograft are poorly described. In this study, we aim to evaluate functional outcomes, implant survival, and complications of the megaprosthesis in salvaging a failed osteoarticular allograft around the knee.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the medical profiles of 21 skeletally mature patients who underwent megaprosthesis reconstruction to salvage a failed osteoarticular allograft around the knee implanted before skeletal maturity. The location of reconstruction was the proximal tibia in 13 patients and the distal femur in eight patients. Knee function was evaluated by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) ‎score and the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of patients was 16±1.7 years. The mean interval between the primary (allograft) and secondary (megaprosthesis) reconstructions was 59.4±23.6 months. At an average follow-up of 51.2 months, the mean knee range of motion was 101.2±15.6°. The mean MSTS score and TESS were 83.6±7 and 86.6±7.9, respectively. The mean limb length discrepancy was 2.5±1 cm before and 0.36±0.74 cm after the operation (P<0.001). Six postoperative complications (28.6%) occurred in this series, including one wound dehiscence, one periprosthetic fracture, two acute infections, one aseptic loosening, and one delayed periprosthetic infection. Only the last two complications required revision. Accordingly, the two- and five-year implant survivals were 95.7% and 90%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Megaprosthesis is a viable option for salvaging failed osteoarticular allografts around the knee. It also provides the opportunity to correct the limb length discrepancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46704,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10989722/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/ABJS.2023.74212.3434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Functional expectations following the salvage of a failed osteoarticular allograft are poorly described. In this study, we aim to evaluate functional outcomes, implant survival, and complications of the megaprosthesis in salvaging a failed osteoarticular allograft around the knee.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical profiles of 21 skeletally mature patients who underwent megaprosthesis reconstruction to salvage a failed osteoarticular allograft around the knee implanted before skeletal maturity. The location of reconstruction was the proximal tibia in 13 patients and the distal femur in eight patients. Knee function was evaluated by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) ‎score and the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS).

Results: The mean age of patients was 16±1.7 years. The mean interval between the primary (allograft) and secondary (megaprosthesis) reconstructions was 59.4±23.6 months. At an average follow-up of 51.2 months, the mean knee range of motion was 101.2±15.6°. The mean MSTS score and TESS were 83.6±7 and 86.6±7.9, respectively. The mean limb length discrepancy was 2.5±1 cm before and 0.36±0.74 cm after the operation (P<0.001). Six postoperative complications (28.6%) occurred in this series, including one wound dehiscence, one periprosthetic fracture, two acute infections, one aseptic loosening, and one delayed periprosthetic infection. Only the last two complications required revision. Accordingly, the two- and five-year implant survivals were 95.7% and 90%, respectively.

Conclusion: Megaprosthesis is a viable option for salvaging failed osteoarticular allografts around the knee. It also provides the opportunity to correct the limb length discrepancy.

为挽救原发性骨肉瘤患者骨骼成熟前植入的膝关节周围骨关节异体移植失败而进行的巨型假体重建的疗效:病例系列。
目的:对于骨关节异体移植失败后的功能预期,目前还没有很好的描述。本研究旨在评估巨型假体在挽救失败的膝关节周围骨关节异体移植中的功能效果、植入物存活率和并发症:我们回顾性分析了21名骨骼发育成熟的患者的病史,这些患者接受了巨型假体重建术,以挽救骨骼发育成熟前植入失败的膝关节周围骨关节异体移植。13名患者的重建位置是胫骨近端,8名患者的重建位置是股骨远端。膝关节功能通过肌肉骨骼肿瘤协会(MSTS)评分和多伦多肢体救治评分(TESS)进行评估:结果:患者的平均年龄为(16±1.7)岁。初次(异体移植)和二次(巨型假体)重建的平均间隔时间为 59.4±23.6 个月。平均随访时间为 51.2 个月,平均膝关节活动范围为 101.2±15.6°。平均MSTS评分和TESS评分分别为(83.6±7)分和(86.6±7.9)分。术前平均肢长差异为(2.5±1)厘米,术后为(0.36±0.74)厘米:Megaprosthesis是挽救膝关节周围骨关节异体移植失败的可行方案。它还为纠正肢体长度不一致提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) aims to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of Orthopedic Sciences. The journal accepts scientific papers including original research, review article, short communication, case report, and letter to the editor in all fields of bone, joint, musculoskeletal surgery and related researches. The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) will publish papers in all aspects of today`s modern orthopedic sciences including: Arthroscopy, Arthroplasty, Sport Medicine, Reconstruction, Hand and Upper Extremity, Pediatric Orthopedics, Spine, Trauma, Foot and Ankle, Tumor, Joint Rheumatic Disease, Skeletal Imaging, Orthopedic Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation, Orthopedic Basic Sciences (Biomechanics, Biotechnology, Biomaterial..).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信