[A framework for promoting and evaluating "Kayoi-no-ba" initiatives according to the Plan-Do-Check-Action cycle: The ACT-RECIPE framework].

Satoshi Seino, Yu Nofuji, Takuya Ueda, Yuta Nemoto, Masataka Kuraoka, Junta Takahashi, Hiroki Mori, Toshiki Hata, Akihiko Kitamura, Erika Kobayashi, Hiroshi Murayama, Keiko Motokawa, Shinji Hattori, Minoru Yamada, Katsunori Kondo, Hidenori Arai, Yoshinori Fujiwara
{"title":"[A framework for promoting and evaluating \"Kayoi-no-ba\" initiatives according to the Plan-Do-Check-Action cycle: The ACT-RECIPE framework].","authors":"Satoshi Seino, Yu Nofuji, Takuya Ueda, Yuta Nemoto, Masataka Kuraoka, Junta Takahashi, Hiroki Mori, Toshiki Hata, Akihiko Kitamura, Erika Kobayashi, Hiroshi Murayama, Keiko Motokawa, Shinji Hattori, Minoru Yamada, Katsunori Kondo, Hidenori Arai, Yoshinori Fujiwara","doi":"10.11236/jph.23-093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective In 2019, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare emphasized the importance of promoting \"Kayoi-no-ba\" (or \"places to go\") initiatives according to the Plan-Do-Check-Action (PDCA) cycle. However, it proposed no specific promotion measures or standardized evaluation frameworks. This study is intended to propose a framework for local government officials to promote and evaluate \"Kayoi-no-ba\" initiatives according to the PDCA cycle.Methods The working group (WG) conducted a narrative review of research and extracted evaluation models and indicators that could be used to create the framework. The co-researcher review committee discussed a draft framework prepared by the WG, and the WG revised it based on the discussion; this process was repeated four times. Using the completed framework, we calculated the score of the \"Kayoi-no-ba\" initiatives in 50 Tokyo municipalities and conducted regional correlation analyses on the relationship between the score of the \"Kayoi-no-ba\" initiatives in 50 Tokyo municipalities and the number of \"Kayoi-no-ba\" per 1,000 older persons.Results The completed framework (named \"ACT-RECIPE\" by rearranging the underlined characters below) comprised the following six evaluation phases: (1) Comprehension: understanding the key lessons around disability and frailty prevention, and the necessity for \"Kayoi-no-ba\"; (2) Research and Planning: clarifying the current status of \"Kayoi-no-ba,\" the strengths of the community, and the issues to be addressed through a community assessment, and developing a plan to resolve the issues; (3) Team Building and Collaboration: building a team by collaborating with organizations to solve problems; (4) Implementation: implementing the initiatives necessary to solve problems; (5) Evaluation: verifying changes in output and outcome indicators from the initiatives; and (6) Adjustment and Improvement: re-examining plans, teams, content, and goals based on the evaluation results. In these six phases, we designated 10 core items and accompanying subitems. The median score rate of the ACT-RECIPE framework in 50 municipalities was 75% for \"Comprehension,\" 61% for \"Research and Planning,\" 69% for \"Team Building and Collaboration,\" 64% for \"Implementation,\" 31% for \"Evaluation,\" and 56% for \"Adjustment and Improvement,\" and the mean ACT-RECIPE score rate was 57%. A significant positive correlation (r<sub>s</sub>=0.43, P=0.002) was observed between the ACT-RECIPE mean score rate and the number of \"Kayoi-no-ba\" per 1,000 older persons.Conclusion We proposed the ACT-RECIPE as a framework for promoting and evaluating \"Kayoi-no-ba\" initiatives according to the PDCA cycle. We hope that this framework will lead to further progress in \"Kayoi-no-ba\" initiatives and facilitate evaluation of their effectiveness according to the PDCA cycle.</p>","PeriodicalId":72032,"journal":{"name":"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health","volume":" ","pages":"418-429"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11236/jph.23-093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective In 2019, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare emphasized the importance of promoting "Kayoi-no-ba" (or "places to go") initiatives according to the Plan-Do-Check-Action (PDCA) cycle. However, it proposed no specific promotion measures or standardized evaluation frameworks. This study is intended to propose a framework for local government officials to promote and evaluate "Kayoi-no-ba" initiatives according to the PDCA cycle.Methods The working group (WG) conducted a narrative review of research and extracted evaluation models and indicators that could be used to create the framework. The co-researcher review committee discussed a draft framework prepared by the WG, and the WG revised it based on the discussion; this process was repeated four times. Using the completed framework, we calculated the score of the "Kayoi-no-ba" initiatives in 50 Tokyo municipalities and conducted regional correlation analyses on the relationship between the score of the "Kayoi-no-ba" initiatives in 50 Tokyo municipalities and the number of "Kayoi-no-ba" per 1,000 older persons.Results The completed framework (named "ACT-RECIPE" by rearranging the underlined characters below) comprised the following six evaluation phases: (1) Comprehension: understanding the key lessons around disability and frailty prevention, and the necessity for "Kayoi-no-ba"; (2) Research and Planning: clarifying the current status of "Kayoi-no-ba," the strengths of the community, and the issues to be addressed through a community assessment, and developing a plan to resolve the issues; (3) Team Building and Collaboration: building a team by collaborating with organizations to solve problems; (4) Implementation: implementing the initiatives necessary to solve problems; (5) Evaluation: verifying changes in output and outcome indicators from the initiatives; and (6) Adjustment and Improvement: re-examining plans, teams, content, and goals based on the evaluation results. In these six phases, we designated 10 core items and accompanying subitems. The median score rate of the ACT-RECIPE framework in 50 municipalities was 75% for "Comprehension," 61% for "Research and Planning," 69% for "Team Building and Collaboration," 64% for "Implementation," 31% for "Evaluation," and 56% for "Adjustment and Improvement," and the mean ACT-RECIPE score rate was 57%. A significant positive correlation (rs=0.43, P=0.002) was observed between the ACT-RECIPE mean score rate and the number of "Kayoi-no-ba" per 1,000 older persons.Conclusion We proposed the ACT-RECIPE as a framework for promoting and evaluating "Kayoi-no-ba" initiatives according to the PDCA cycle. We hope that this framework will lead to further progress in "Kayoi-no-ba" initiatives and facilitate evaluation of their effectiveness according to the PDCA cycle.

[根据 "计划--实施--检查--行动 "周期促进和评估 "Kayoi-no-ba "倡议的框架:ACT-RECIPE 框架]。
目标 2019 年,厚生劳动省强调了按照 "计划-实施-检查-行动"(PDCA)周期推广 "Kayoi-no-ba"(或 "去处")倡议的重要性。但是,它没有提出具体的促进措施或标准化评估框架。本研究旨在为地方政府官员根据 PDCA 循环推广和评估 "Kayoi-no-ba "计划提出一个框架。方法 工作组(WG)对研究进行了叙述性回顾,并提取了可用于创建框架的评估模型和指标。共同研究者审查委员会讨论了工作组编写的框架草案,工作组根据讨论结果对草案进行了修订;这一过程重复了四次。利用已完成的框架,我们计算了东京 50 个市町村的 "加代养老 "举措得分,并对东京 50 个市町村的 "加代养老 "举措得分与每千名老年人中的 "加代养老 "人数之间的关系进行了地区相关性分析。结果 完成的框架(通过重新排列下面的下划线字符命名为 "ACT-RECIPE")包括以下六个评估阶 段:(1) 理解:理解有关预防残疾和虚弱的关键经验,以及 "Kayoi-no-ba "的必要 性;(2) 研究和规划:通过社区评估明确 "Kayoi-no-ba "的现状、社区的优势和需 要解决的问题,并制定解决问题的计划;(3) 团队建设和协作:(4) 实施:实施解决问题所需的措施;(5) 评估:核实措施的产出和成果指标的变化;(6) 调整和改进:根据评估结果重新审查计划、团队、内容和目标。在这六个阶段中,我们指定了 10 个核心项目和相应的子项目。50 个城市的 ACT-RECIPE 框架得分率中位数分别为:"理解 "75%、"研究与规划 "61%、"团队建设与合作 "69%、"实施 "64%、"评估 "31% 和 "调整与改进 "56%,ACT-RECIPE 平均得分率为 57%。ACT-RECIPE 平均得分率与每千名老年人中的 "加代无忧 "人数之间存在明显的正相关关系(rs=0.43,P=0.002)。我们希望这一框架能够进一步推动 "老年人之友 "活动的开展,并促进根据 PDCA 循环对其成效进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信