Identifying physiological indicators of the cognitive, thermal, and combined (cognitive-thermal) stress conditions.

Abstract

Physiologically based stress detection systems have proven to be effective in identifying different stress conditions in the body to determine the source of stress and be able to counteract it. However, some stress conditions have not been widely studied, including thermal stress, cognitive stress, and combined (thermal-cognitive) stress conditions, which are frequently encountered in work or school environments. In order to develop systems to detect and differentiate these conditions, it is necessary to identify the physiological indicators that characterize each of them. The present research aims to identify which physiological indicators (heart rate, respiratory rate, galvanic skin response, and local temperature) could differentiate different stress conditions (no-stress, cognitive stress, thermal stress, and combined (thermal-cognitive) stress conditions). Thirty participants were exposed to cognitive, thermal, and combined stress sources while recording their physiological signals. The findings indicate that both mean heart rate and mean galvanic skin response identify moderate thermal and cognitive stress conditions as distinct from a no-stress condition, yet they do not differentiate between the two stress conditions. Additionally, heart rate uniquely identifies the cognitive-thermal stress condition, effectively distinguishing this combined stress condition from the singular stress conditions and the no-stress condition. Mean local temperature specifically signals thermal stress conditions, whereas mean respiratory rate accurately identifies cognitive stress conditions, with both indicators effectively separating these conditions from each other and from the no-stress condition. This is the first basis for differentiating thermal and cognitive stress conditions through physiological indicators.