A novel indirect ELISA for serodiagnosis of mucormycosis using antigens from Rhizopus arrhizus.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Mycoses Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1111/myc.13730
Hansraj Choudhary, Harsimran Kaur, Shreya Singh, Rachna Singh, Valliappan Muthu, Roshan Verma, Shivaprakash M Rudramurthy, Ritesh Agarwal, Sanjay Jain, Amanjit Bal, Anup K Ghosh, Arunaloke Chakrabarti
{"title":"A novel indirect ELISA for serodiagnosis of mucormycosis using antigens from Rhizopus arrhizus.","authors":"Hansraj Choudhary, Harsimran Kaur, Shreya Singh, Rachna Singh, Valliappan Muthu, Roshan Verma, Shivaprakash M Rudramurthy, Ritesh Agarwal, Sanjay Jain, Amanjit Bal, Anup K Ghosh, Arunaloke Chakrabarti","doi":"10.1111/myc.13730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to a delay in diagnosis by conventional techniques and high mortality, the development of a standardised and rapid non-culture-based technique is an unmet need in pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and disseminated forms of mucormycosis. Though limited studies have been conducted for molecular diagnosis, there are no established serologic tests for this highly fatal infection.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and evaluate an indirect in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) utilising antigens of Rhizopus arrhizus for detecting anti-Rhizopus antibodies (IgG and IgM) in sera of patients with mucormycosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We extracted both secretory and mycelial Rhizopus antigens using standardised protocols. Bradford assay was used for protein quantification. We then standardised an indirect ELISA using R. arrhizus mycelial and secretory antigens (10.0 μg/mL in bicarbonate buffer pH 9.2) for detecting anti-Rhizopus IgG and IgM antibodies in patient sera. We included patients with mucormycosis, other fungal infections, and healthy controls. Antibody index value (E-value) was calculated for each patient sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Asparagine broth culture filtrate utilising 85% ammonium sulphate salt fractionation and mycelial homogenate grown in yeast extract peptone dextrose (YPD) broth precipitated with trichloroacetic acid (TCA) yielded a large amount of good-quality protein for the assay. We included 55 patients with mucormycosis (rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis [ROCM, n = 39], pulmonary [n = 15], gastrointestinal [n = 1]), 24 with other fungal infections (probable aspergillosis [n = 14], candidiasis [n = 10]), and healthy controls (n = 16). The sensitivity of the antibody test for diagnosing mucormycosis ranged from 83.6-92.7% for IgG and 72.7-87.3% for IgM, with a specificity of 91.7-92.5% for IgG and 80-82.5% for IgM. The sera from patients with other fungal infections and healthy individuals did not show significant cross-reactivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The detection of anti-Rhizopus IgG antibody performed significantly better in comparison to IgM-based ELISA for diagnosing both ROCM (sensitivity of 84.6% vs. 69.2%) and pulmonary cases (86.6% vs. 80.0%). More extensive studies are required to confirm our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":18797,"journal":{"name":"Mycoses","volume":"67 5","pages":"e13730"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mycoses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.13730","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Due to a delay in diagnosis by conventional techniques and high mortality, the development of a standardised and rapid non-culture-based technique is an unmet need in pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and disseminated forms of mucormycosis. Though limited studies have been conducted for molecular diagnosis, there are no established serologic tests for this highly fatal infection.

Objective: To develop and evaluate an indirect in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) utilising antigens of Rhizopus arrhizus for detecting anti-Rhizopus antibodies (IgG and IgM) in sera of patients with mucormycosis.

Methods: We extracted both secretory and mycelial Rhizopus antigens using standardised protocols. Bradford assay was used for protein quantification. We then standardised an indirect ELISA using R. arrhizus mycelial and secretory antigens (10.0 μg/mL in bicarbonate buffer pH 9.2) for detecting anti-Rhizopus IgG and IgM antibodies in patient sera. We included patients with mucormycosis, other fungal infections, and healthy controls. Antibody index value (E-value) was calculated for each patient sample.

Results: Asparagine broth culture filtrate utilising 85% ammonium sulphate salt fractionation and mycelial homogenate grown in yeast extract peptone dextrose (YPD) broth precipitated with trichloroacetic acid (TCA) yielded a large amount of good-quality protein for the assay. We included 55 patients with mucormycosis (rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis [ROCM, n = 39], pulmonary [n = 15], gastrointestinal [n = 1]), 24 with other fungal infections (probable aspergillosis [n = 14], candidiasis [n = 10]), and healthy controls (n = 16). The sensitivity of the antibody test for diagnosing mucormycosis ranged from 83.6-92.7% for IgG and 72.7-87.3% for IgM, with a specificity of 91.7-92.5% for IgG and 80-82.5% for IgM. The sera from patients with other fungal infections and healthy individuals did not show significant cross-reactivity.

Conclusion: The detection of anti-Rhizopus IgG antibody performed significantly better in comparison to IgM-based ELISA for diagnosing both ROCM (sensitivity of 84.6% vs. 69.2%) and pulmonary cases (86.6% vs. 80.0%). More extensive studies are required to confirm our findings.

利用根瘤蚜抗原对粘孢子虫病进行血清诊断的新型间接酶联免疫吸附试验。
背景:由于传统技术诊断的延迟和高死亡率,开发一种标准化和快速的非培养基技术是肺部、胃肠道和播散型粘孢子菌病尚未满足的需求。虽然分子诊断方面的研究有限,但目前还没有针对这种高致命性感染的成熟血清学检测方法:目的:开发并评估一种间接的内部酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA),利用根瘤蚜抗原检测粘孢子虫病患者血清中的抗根瘤蚜抗体(IgG 和 IgM):方法:我们采用标准化方案提取了分泌型和菌丝型根瘤菌抗原。布拉德福德测定法用于蛋白质定量。然后,我们使用R. arrhizus菌丝和分泌抗原(10.0 μg/mL,碳酸氢盐缓冲液pH 9.2)标准化间接ELISA法检测患者血清中的抗Rhizopus IgG和IgM抗体。我们的研究对象包括粘孢子菌病、其他真菌感染患者和健康对照组。计算每个患者样本的抗体指数值(E值):天冬酰胺肉汤培养滤液采用85%硫酸铵盐分馏,菌丝匀浆在酵母抽提物蛋白胨葡萄糖(YPD)肉汤中培养,用三氯乙酸(TCA)沉淀,可产生大量优质蛋白用于检测。我们纳入了 55 名粘孢子菌病患者(鼻-眼-脑粘孢子菌病 [ROCM, n = 39]、肺粘孢子菌病 [n = 15]、胃肠粘孢子菌病 [n = 1])、24 名其他真菌感染患者(可能的曲霉菌病 [n = 14]、念珠菌病 [n = 10])和健康对照组(n = 16)。抗体检测诊断粘孢子菌病的灵敏度为:IgG 83.6-92.7%,IgM 72.7-87.3%;特异性为:IgG 91.7-92.5%,IgM 80-82.5%。其他真菌感染患者和健康人的血清未显示出明显的交叉反应:结论:在诊断 ROCM(灵敏度为 84.6% 对 69.2%)和肺部病例(灵敏度为 86.6% 对 80.0%)时,检测抗链霉菌 IgG 抗体的效果明显优于基于 IgM 的 ELISA。要证实我们的研究结果,还需要进行更广泛的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mycoses
Mycoses 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
8.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Mycoses provides an international forum for original papers in English on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapy, prophylaxis, and epidemiology of fungal infectious diseases in humans as well as on the biology of pathogenic fungi. Medical mycology as part of medical microbiology is advancing rapidly. Effective therapeutic strategies are already available in chemotherapy and are being further developed. Their application requires reliable laboratory diagnostic techniques, which, in turn, result from mycological basic research. Opportunistic mycoses vary greatly in their clinical and pathological symptoms, because the underlying disease of a patient at risk decisively determines their symptomatology and progress. The journal Mycoses is therefore of interest to scientists in fundamental mycological research, mycological laboratory diagnosticians and clinicians interested in fungal infections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信