Two surgical instruments.

4区 医学 Q3 Neuroscience
Progress in brain research Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-24 DOI:10.1016/bs.pbr.2024.02.018
Jeremy C Ganz
{"title":"Two surgical instruments.","authors":"Jeremy C Ganz","doi":"10.1016/bs.pbr.2024.02.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The only instruments for opening the cranium considered in this chapter are drills, and in some cases facilitated with a special chisel called a lenticular. There were two kinds of trepan. The modiolus was the Latin name for a crown trepan which had a circular base with teeth which sawed a hole. Then there were the non-penetrating trepans which had a bit shaped to prevent unwanted penetration. They made small openings which could be joined by chisels to remove altogether larger areas of bone than were accessible to modioli. They were the favored instrument from the ancient world up to the Renaissance. At the beginning of the Renaissance, there was a move toward greater use of crown trepans and various methods were applied to stop them sinking too far inward. These included wings in the outer wall and changing the shape of the bit from cylindrical to conic. In time preferences returned to the cylindrical shape and larger diameters. There was also two instruments called lenticulars, the illustrations of which have been confused in the literature. It is now clear that the Roman instrument was shaped to cut the cranium and minimize the need for trepanation. The Renaissance instrument had a different shape and was used to smooth rough bone edges and excise spicules penetrating the meninges. They were simply two different instruments to which the same name was applied.</p>","PeriodicalId":20598,"journal":{"name":"Progress in brain research","volume":"285 ","pages":"115-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in brain research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2024.02.018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The only instruments for opening the cranium considered in this chapter are drills, and in some cases facilitated with a special chisel called a lenticular. There were two kinds of trepan. The modiolus was the Latin name for a crown trepan which had a circular base with teeth which sawed a hole. Then there were the non-penetrating trepans which had a bit shaped to prevent unwanted penetration. They made small openings which could be joined by chisels to remove altogether larger areas of bone than were accessible to modioli. They were the favored instrument from the ancient world up to the Renaissance. At the beginning of the Renaissance, there was a move toward greater use of crown trepans and various methods were applied to stop them sinking too far inward. These included wings in the outer wall and changing the shape of the bit from cylindrical to conic. In time preferences returned to the cylindrical shape and larger diameters. There was also two instruments called lenticulars, the illustrations of which have been confused in the literature. It is now clear that the Roman instrument was shaped to cut the cranium and minimize the need for trepanation. The Renaissance instrument had a different shape and was used to smooth rough bone edges and excise spicules penetrating the meninges. They were simply two different instruments to which the same name was applied.

两种手术器械。
本章讨论的唯一开颅工具是钻孔器,在某些情况下还可以使用一种名为 "透镜 "的特殊凿子。穿孔器有两种,"modiolus "是冠状穿孔器的拉丁文名称,它有一个圆形底座,底座上有锯齿,可以锯出一个洞。还有一种是非穿透式凿子,它的齿形可以防止不必要的穿透。它们可以开出小口,用凿子将小口连接起来,从而取出比模制器更大面积的骨头。从古代世界到文艺复兴时期,凿岩机一直是最受欢迎的工具。文艺复兴初期,人们开始更多地使用冠状穿刺器,并采用了各种方法来防止穿刺器过于向内凹陷。这些方法包括在外壁加翼,以及将钻头的形状从圆柱形改为圆锥形。随着时间的推移,人们又喜欢使用圆柱形和更大的直径。还有两种被称为光栅的工具,其插图在文献中被混淆了。现在可以明确的是,罗马式器械的形状是用来切割颅骨的,可以最大限度地减少穿刺的需要。文艺复兴时期的器械形状不同,用于磨平粗糙的骨边缘和切除穿透脑膜的骨刺。它们只是两种不同的器械,却使用了相同的名称。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Progress in brain research
Progress in brain research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Brain Research is the most acclaimed and accomplished series in neuroscience. The serial is well-established as an extensive documentation of contemporary advances in the field. The volumes contain authoritative reviews and original articles by invited specialists. The rigorous editing of the volumes assures that they will appeal to all laboratory and clinical brain research workers in the various disciplines: neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, neuroendocrinology, neuropathology, basic neurology, biological psychiatry and the behavioral sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信