Effect of Educational Interventions for Improving the Nurses' Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Pediatric Pain Management: A Aystematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
{"title":"Effect of Educational Interventions for Improving the Nurses' Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Pediatric Pain Management: A Aystematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of educational interventions in improving nurses' knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding pediatric pain management.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><p><span>A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, </span>Cochrane database, Google Scholar, and trial registries, supplemented by bibliography searches.</p></div><div><h3>Review/Analysis Methods</h3><p>This review included randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized trials, and quasi-experimental trials with control groups. Eligible studies involved nurses (professionals or students) caring for pediatric patients and featured any form of educational intervention for pain management. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using a random effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I-squared statistic.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The pooled results demonstrated a significant improvement in nurses' knowledge and attitudes toward pediatric pain management postintervention, with a Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) of 2.41 (95% CI: 0.58-4.23). Additionally, the pooled results indicated a higher likelihood of effective pain medication administration (OR = 1.98; 95% CI: 1.21-3.27). However, there was no significant difference in the utilization of pain assessment tools (OR = 19.85; 95% CI: 0.29-1352.98). Pooled OR was 3.42 (95% CI: 1.93-6.07), showing significantly higher odds of ability to administer nonpharmacological interventions. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Educational interventions significantly improve nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and ability to administer both pharmacological and nonpharmacological pediatric pain management interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":"25 4","pages":"Pages e271-e278"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904224001474","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of educational interventions in improving nurses' knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding pediatric pain management.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data Sources

A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane database, Google Scholar, and trial registries, supplemented by bibliography searches.

Review/Analysis Methods

This review included randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized trials, and quasi-experimental trials with control groups. Eligible studies involved nurses (professionals or students) caring for pediatric patients and featured any form of educational intervention for pain management. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using a random effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I-squared statistic.

Results

The pooled results demonstrated a significant improvement in nurses' knowledge and attitudes toward pediatric pain management postintervention, with a Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) of 2.41 (95% CI: 0.58-4.23). Additionally, the pooled results indicated a higher likelihood of effective pain medication administration (OR = 1.98; 95% CI: 1.21-3.27). However, there was no significant difference in the utilization of pain assessment tools (OR = 19.85; 95% CI: 0.29-1352.98). Pooled OR was 3.42 (95% CI: 1.93-6.07), showing significantly higher odds of ability to administer nonpharmacological interventions. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings.

Conclusions

Educational interventions significantly improve nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and ability to administer both pharmacological and nonpharmacological pediatric pain management interventions.

教育干预对改善护士儿科疼痛管理知识、态度和实践的影响:系统回顾与元分析》。
目的本研究旨在评估教育干预对改善护士在儿科疼痛管理方面的知识、态度和实践的有效性:设计:系统综述和荟萃分析:在 MEDLINE、Scopus、Cochrane 数据库、Google Scholar 和试验登记处进行了全面检索,并辅以书目检索:本综述包括随机对照试验、非随机试验和带有对照组的准实验试验。符合条件的研究涉及护理儿科患者的护士(专业人员或学生),并以任何形式的疼痛管理教育干预为特色。使用随机效应模型计算汇总效果估计值,并使用 I 平方统计量评估异质性:汇总结果表明,干预后护士对儿科疼痛管理的知识和态度有了明显改善,标准化平均差(SMD)为 2.41(95% CI:0.58-4.23)。此外,汇总结果显示,有效止痛用药的可能性更高(OR = 1.98;95% CI:1.21-3.27)。然而,在使用疼痛评估工具方面没有明显差异(OR = 19.85;95% CI:0.29-1352.98)。汇总 OR 为 3.42 (95% CI: 1.93-6.07),表明有能力实施非药物干预的几率明显更高。敏感性分析证实了这些结果的可靠性:教育干预能明显改善护士的知识、态度以及实施药物和非药物儿科疼痛管理干预的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信