Digital Evaluation of Trueness and Precision of Modern Impression Materials in Implant- Retained Mandibular Overdentures.

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
R G Ghanem, A M I Badr, E M T M Agamy, T F Eyüboğlu, M Özcan
{"title":"Digital Evaluation of Trueness and Precision of Modern Impression Materials in Implant- Retained Mandibular Overdentures.","authors":"R G Ghanem, A M I Badr, E M T M Agamy, T F Eyüboğlu, M Özcan","doi":"10.1922/EJPRD_2638Ghanem11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the dimensional accuracy, trueness, and precision of vinyl siloxane ether (VSXE) and polyvinylsiloxane (PVS) impression materials using different impression techniques.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A three-dimensional (3D) printed mandibular model with implants and metal rods served as the reference model. Impressions were taken in custom trays, resulting in four groups: PVS-closed-tray, VSXE-closed-tray, PVS-open-tray, and VSXE-open-tray. The reference model and impressions were scanned and analyzed using 3D analysis software to assess the trueness and precision within each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was significant difference in trueness between the groups, with PVS closed tray showing a higher deviation than VSXE-closed-tray and PVS-open-tray. VSXE-open-tray had the lowest deviation, which was statistically significant. In terms of precision, PVS-closed-tray showed the highest deviation, while no significant differences were found among the other groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VSXE impression material with an open tray technique consistently demonstrated the highest levels of accuracy and precision. Conversely, PVS impression material with a closed tray technique yielded less favorable results.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Better understanding of trueness and precision of new impression materials with new impression techniques will increase their clinical effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":45686,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2638Ghanem11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the dimensional accuracy, trueness, and precision of vinyl siloxane ether (VSXE) and polyvinylsiloxane (PVS) impression materials using different impression techniques.

Material and methods: A three-dimensional (3D) printed mandibular model with implants and metal rods served as the reference model. Impressions were taken in custom trays, resulting in four groups: PVS-closed-tray, VSXE-closed-tray, PVS-open-tray, and VSXE-open-tray. The reference model and impressions were scanned and analyzed using 3D analysis software to assess the trueness and precision within each group.

Results: There was significant difference in trueness between the groups, with PVS closed tray showing a higher deviation than VSXE-closed-tray and PVS-open-tray. VSXE-open-tray had the lowest deviation, which was statistically significant. In terms of precision, PVS-closed-tray showed the highest deviation, while no significant differences were found among the other groups.

Conclusions: VSXE impression material with an open tray technique consistently demonstrated the highest levels of accuracy and precision. Conversely, PVS impression material with a closed tray technique yielded less favorable results.

Clinical relevance: Better understanding of trueness and precision of new impression materials with new impression techniques will increase their clinical effectiveness.

对种植体固位下颌覆盖义齿中现代印模材料的真实性和精确性进行数字化评估。
前言:这项体外研究的目的是评估乙烯基硅氧烷醚(VSXE)和聚乙烯硅氧烷(PVS)印模材料在使用不同印模技术时的尺寸准确性、真实性和精确性:参考模型是一个带有种植体和金属杆的三维(3D)打印下颌骨模型。在定制托盘中进行印模,共分为四组:PVS封闭托盘组、VSXE封闭托盘组、PVS开放托盘组和VSXE开放托盘组。使用三维分析软件对参考模型和印模进行扫描和分析,以评估每组的真实度和精确度:结果:各组之间的真实度存在明显差异,PVS 封闭式牙盘的偏差高于 VSXE 封闭式牙盘和 PVS 开放式牙盘。VSXE-open-tray 的偏差最小,具有统计学意义。在精确度方面,PVS-闭式托盘的偏差最大,而其他组之间没有发现明显差异:结论:采用开放式托盘技术的 VSXE 印模材料一直表现出最高的准确度和精确度。结论:采用开放式托盘技术的 VSXE 印模材料始终表现出最高的准确度和精确度,相反,采用封闭式托盘技术的 PVS 印模材料产生的结果较差:临床意义:更好地了解采用新印模技术的新型印模材料的真实度和精确度将提高其临床效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry is published quarterly and includes clinical and research articles in subjects such as prosthodontics, operative dentistry, implantology, endodontics, periodontics and dental materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信