Hippocrates (ca 460 BC to ca 370 BC).

4区 医学 Q3 Neuroscience
Progress in brain research Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-26 DOI:10.1016/bs.pbr.2024.02.004
Jeremy C Ganz
{"title":"Hippocrates (ca 460 BC to ca 370 BC).","authors":"Jeremy C Ganz","doi":"10.1016/bs.pbr.2024.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The chapter begins with a review of some of the background thinking during Hippocrates time. The brain was considered to be the location of the soul which was the essence of subjective experience. However, this was not a brain function as such but rather a location where the pneuma reacted with the soul. Hippocrates' monograph on cranial trauma begins with a description of the bones and sutures. He then systematized the classification of cranial injury. He sensibly advised accurate diagnosis into one of the types of injury he described and supported extension of any skin opening to facilitate diagnosis of the bone, the injury of which was his primary concern. His description of operative technique has rarely been surpassed, placing emphasis on care and methods for the avoidance of further injury. He also emphasized the importance of probing during trepanation to avoid damaging the dura and underlying brain. In addition, he insisted on using water to cool the trepan. All of this was positive. However, the respect in which he was held in subsequent generations meant that two albeit understandable errors were perpetuated. The first error was the use of prophylactic trepanation to permit the drainage of the pus which he believed would inevitably develop under a fissure. The second was to avoid trepanning at sutures, the reasons for which proscription are not clearly stated. In conclusion, it may be noted that what limited reporting of results is available demonstrates that Hippocrates trepanations were largely not successful.</p>","PeriodicalId":20598,"journal":{"name":"Progress in brain research","volume":"284 ","pages":"31-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in brain research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2024.02.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The chapter begins with a review of some of the background thinking during Hippocrates time. The brain was considered to be the location of the soul which was the essence of subjective experience. However, this was not a brain function as such but rather a location where the pneuma reacted with the soul. Hippocrates' monograph on cranial trauma begins with a description of the bones and sutures. He then systematized the classification of cranial injury. He sensibly advised accurate diagnosis into one of the types of injury he described and supported extension of any skin opening to facilitate diagnosis of the bone, the injury of which was his primary concern. His description of operative technique has rarely been surpassed, placing emphasis on care and methods for the avoidance of further injury. He also emphasized the importance of probing during trepanation to avoid damaging the dura and underlying brain. In addition, he insisted on using water to cool the trepan. All of this was positive. However, the respect in which he was held in subsequent generations meant that two albeit understandable errors were perpetuated. The first error was the use of prophylactic trepanation to permit the drainage of the pus which he believed would inevitably develop under a fissure. The second was to avoid trepanning at sutures, the reasons for which proscription are not clearly stated. In conclusion, it may be noted that what limited reporting of results is available demonstrates that Hippocrates trepanations were largely not successful.

希波克拉底(约公元前 460 年至约公元前 370 年)。
本章首先回顾了希波克拉底时代的一些背景思想。大脑被认为是灵魂的所在,而灵魂是主观体验的本质。然而,这本身并不是大脑的功能,而是气与灵魂发生反应的位置。希波克拉底关于颅脑创伤的专著首先描述了骨骼和缝合线。然后,他对颅脑损伤进行了系统分类。他理智地建议将准确诊断归入他所描述的损伤类型之一,并支持扩大任何皮肤开口以方便诊断骨骼,因为骨骼损伤是他最关心的问题。他对手术技巧的描述很少有人能超越,强调了避免进一步损伤的护理和方法。他还强调了在穿刺过程中探查的重要性,以避免损伤硬脑膜和下层脑组织。所有这些都是积极的。然而,后世对他的尊敬意味着两个尽管可以理解的错误被延续了下来。第一个错误是使用预防性穿刺,以便排出脓液,因为他认为脓液不可避免地会从裂隙中流出。第二个错误是避免在缝合处进行穿刺,但没有明确说明禁止这样做的原因。总之,可以指出的是,现有的有限结果报告表明,希波克拉底的穿刺手术大多不成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Progress in brain research
Progress in brain research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Brain Research is the most acclaimed and accomplished series in neuroscience. The serial is well-established as an extensive documentation of contemporary advances in the field. The volumes contain authoritative reviews and original articles by invited specialists. The rigorous editing of the volumes assures that they will appeal to all laboratory and clinical brain research workers in the various disciplines: neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, neuroendocrinology, neuropathology, basic neurology, biological psychiatry and the behavioral sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信