Mental Health Status during COVID-19 Pandemic and its Relationship with Economic Hardship and Financial Threat among Rural Population in Sarawak, Malaysia.

Q4 Medicine
Kathmandu University Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-04-01
N Amirah, R Rahman
{"title":"Mental Health Status during COVID-19 Pandemic and its Relationship with Economic Hardship and Financial Threat among Rural Population in Sarawak, Malaysia.","authors":"N Amirah, R Rahman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, job and income loss, social isolation may aggravate mental health, particularly among the most vulnerable groups. Objective To assess the current mental health situation among the rural population in Samarahan district and determine the relationship between economic hardships, financial threats, and mental health status. Method This study was a cross-sectional study conducted among the 530 households in the Samarahan district. A multistage cluster sampling technique was used to select the participants in this study. Data were collected by face-to-face interview using a structured questionnaire. The mental health status was assessed by using a validated and translated DASS-21 scale. Data analysis was done by SPSS version 27.0. A p-value of ≤ .05 was considered statistically significant. Result Analysis showed that two-thirds of the respondents (66.6%) had no mental health problem. Meanwhile, 22.4% had anxiety, 1% had depression, and 0.19% had stress. Anxiety and depression accounted for 5.8% and stress and anxiety 1.3%. However, 2.64% had stress, anxiety, and depression. In bivariate analysis, age, monthly income, type of job, economic hardship, and expenditure difference appeared to be significant predictors of mental health problems (p < .05). Conclusion Depression, anxiety, and stress pose a significant threat to the rural population's health. Therefore, public health practitioners and policymakers need to address this to minimise the pandemic's impact on mental health and provide psychological support, particularly among the most affected group.</p>","PeriodicalId":35493,"journal":{"name":"Kathmandu University Medical Journal","volume":"21 82","pages":"149-155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kathmandu University Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, job and income loss, social isolation may aggravate mental health, particularly among the most vulnerable groups. Objective To assess the current mental health situation among the rural population in Samarahan district and determine the relationship between economic hardships, financial threats, and mental health status. Method This study was a cross-sectional study conducted among the 530 households in the Samarahan district. A multistage cluster sampling technique was used to select the participants in this study. Data were collected by face-to-face interview using a structured questionnaire. The mental health status was assessed by using a validated and translated DASS-21 scale. Data analysis was done by SPSS version 27.0. A p-value of ≤ .05 was considered statistically significant. Result Analysis showed that two-thirds of the respondents (66.6%) had no mental health problem. Meanwhile, 22.4% had anxiety, 1% had depression, and 0.19% had stress. Anxiety and depression accounted for 5.8% and stress and anxiety 1.3%. However, 2.64% had stress, anxiety, and depression. In bivariate analysis, age, monthly income, type of job, economic hardship, and expenditure difference appeared to be significant predictors of mental health problems (p < .05). Conclusion Depression, anxiety, and stress pose a significant threat to the rural population's health. Therefore, public health practitioners and policymakers need to address this to minimise the pandemic's impact on mental health and provide psychological support, particularly among the most affected group.

马来西亚沙捞越农村人口在 COVID-19 大流行期间的心理健康状况及其与经济困难和财务威胁的关系。
背景 在 COVID-19 大流行期间,失去工作和收入、社会孤立可能会加重心理健康问题,尤其是最脆弱群体的心理健康问题。目标 评估萨马拉汉地区农村人口的心理健康状况,并确定经济困难、财务威胁和心理健康状况之间的关系。方法 本研究是一项横断面研究,研究对象是萨马拉汉地区的 530 户家庭。本研究采用多阶段聚类抽样技术选择参与者。通过结构化问卷进行面对面访谈收集数据。心理健康状况采用经过验证和翻译的 DASS-21 量表进行评估。数据分析采用 SPSS 27.0 版。P值≤0.05为具有统计学意义。结果 分析显示,三分之二的受访者(66.6%)没有心理健康问题。22.4% 的受访者有焦虑症,1% 的受访者有抑郁症,0.19% 的受访者有压力症。焦虑和抑郁占 5.8%,压力和焦虑占 1.3%。然而,2.64%的人有压力、焦虑和抑郁。在双变量分析中,年龄、月收入、工作类型、经济困难和支出差异似乎是心理健康问题的重要预测因素(p < .05)。结论 抑郁、焦虑和压力对农村人口的健康构成重大威胁。因此,公共卫生从业人员和政策制定者需要解决这一问题,以尽量减少大流行病对心理健康的影响,并提供心理支持,尤其是在受影响最大的群体中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kathmandu University Medical Journal
Kathmandu University Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信