Building prevention research science communication and knowledge translation capacity through multidisciplinary collaboration.

IF 2.5 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Shaan S Naughton, Konsita Kuswara, Ainsley E Burgess, Helen C Dinmore, Cindy Jones, Karen Metcalfe, Heidi Turon, Helen Signy
{"title":"Building prevention research science communication and knowledge translation capacity through multidisciplinary collaboration.","authors":"Shaan S Naughton, Konsita Kuswara, Ainsley E Burgess, Helen C Dinmore, Cindy Jones, Karen Metcalfe, Heidi Turon, Helen Signy","doi":"10.17061/phrp3412409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To document the outcomes of a dedicated Science Communication Community of Practice (CoP) for increasing prevention-focused knowledge translation (KT) and evidence uptake. Type of program: Shared priorities and a united vision to communicate the value of prevention research led to the formation of a dedicated Science Communication CoP within an Australian public health prevention-focused research collaboration. Members of the CoP included science communication experts and early- and mid-career researchers (EMCRs) with KT-focused roles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CoP met monthly, with semi-structured meetings led by an experienced science communication professional. A priority of the CoP was to develop resources that could help members and external parties to communicate their findings, especially EMCRs and those working on low-resourced projects. Insights from CoP members were synthesised to document if, and how, the CoP increased communication and KT capacity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CoP members found that participatory dialogue - dialogue that involves sharing perspectives and listening to others in order to develop a shared understanding - helped promote a greater understanding of science communication techniques and led to KT being embedded within projects. The CoP itself resulted in shared narratives and communication outputs that could not have been produced by individual members, primarily due to a lack of dedicated resourcing. Members found that engaging in the CoP increased their use of a range of science communication skills, tactics, and methods (e.g., targeted messaging for policy and practice, use of media and social media, and event management to engage audiences and build trust).</p><p><strong>Lessons learnt: </strong>The CoP helped build a greater working knowledge of science communication among its members, leading to increased KT activities. Within an environment of low resourcing for science communication, bringing researchers together with science communication experts can help promote the communication of synthesised evidence and unified messaging on 'what works for prevention'.</p>","PeriodicalId":45898,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Research & Practice","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp3412409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To document the outcomes of a dedicated Science Communication Community of Practice (CoP) for increasing prevention-focused knowledge translation (KT) and evidence uptake. Type of program: Shared priorities and a united vision to communicate the value of prevention research led to the formation of a dedicated Science Communication CoP within an Australian public health prevention-focused research collaboration. Members of the CoP included science communication experts and early- and mid-career researchers (EMCRs) with KT-focused roles.

Methods: The CoP met monthly, with semi-structured meetings led by an experienced science communication professional. A priority of the CoP was to develop resources that could help members and external parties to communicate their findings, especially EMCRs and those working on low-resourced projects. Insights from CoP members were synthesised to document if, and how, the CoP increased communication and KT capacity.

Results: CoP members found that participatory dialogue - dialogue that involves sharing perspectives and listening to others in order to develop a shared understanding - helped promote a greater understanding of science communication techniques and led to KT being embedded within projects. The CoP itself resulted in shared narratives and communication outputs that could not have been produced by individual members, primarily due to a lack of dedicated resourcing. Members found that engaging in the CoP increased their use of a range of science communication skills, tactics, and methods (e.g., targeted messaging for policy and practice, use of media and social media, and event management to engage audiences and build trust).

Lessons learnt: The CoP helped build a greater working knowledge of science communication among its members, leading to increased KT activities. Within an environment of low resourcing for science communication, bringing researchers together with science communication experts can help promote the communication of synthesised evidence and unified messaging on 'what works for prevention'.

通过多学科合作提高预防研究科学传播和知识转化能力。
目的:记录一个专门的科学传播实践社区(CoP)的成果,以增加以预防为重点的知识转化(KT)和证据吸收。计划类型:在澳大利亚一个以公共卫生预防为重点的研究合作项目中,由于在传播预防研究价值方面有着共同的优先事项和一致的愿景,因此成立了一个专门的科学传播实践社区(CoP)。合作小组成员包括科学传播专家和以 KT 为重点的中早期研究人员 (EMCR):方法:合作小组每月召开一次会议,由一名经验丰富的科学传播专家主持半结构化会议。该委员会的首要任务是开发资源,帮助委员会成员和外部人员,尤其是 EMCR 和那些从事资源匮乏项目的人员,传播他们的研究成果。CoP 成员的意见得到了综合,以记录 CoP 是否以及如何提高了传播和 KT 能力:结果:CoP 成员发现,参与式对话(对话包括分享观点和倾听他人意见,以形成共同的理解)有助于促进对科学传播技术的进一步理解,并将知识共享纳入项目。主要由于缺乏专门资源,合作伙 伴关系本身产生了单个成员无法产生的共同叙述和传播成果。成员们发现,参与合作伙 伴关系提高了他们对一系列科学传播技能、策略和方法的使用(例如,为政策和实践提供有 针对性的信息、使用媒体和社交媒体以及活动管理,以吸引受众并建立信任):经验与教训:科学政策委员会帮助其成员提高了对科学传播的工作认识,从而增加了科 学传播活动。在科学传播资源较少的情况下,将研究人员与科学传播专家聚集在一起,有助于促进综合证据的传播和关于 "什么对预防有效 "的统一信息的传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Research & Practice
Public Health Research & Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Health Research & Practice is an open-access, quarterly, online journal with a strong focus on the connection between research, policy and practice. It publishes innovative, high-quality papers that inform public health policy and practice, paying particular attention to innovations, data and perspectives from policy and practice. The journal is published by the Sax Institute, a national leader in promoting the use of research evidence in health policy. Formerly known as The NSW Public Health Bulletin, the journal has a long history. It was published by the NSW Ministry of Health for nearly a quarter of a century. Responsibility for its publication transferred to the Sax Institute in 2014, and the journal receives guidance from an expert editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信