Strengthening First Responders' Coaching Proficiency through a Peer Fitness Leader Workshop: A Preliminary Efficacy Trial.

Q1 Health Professions
International journal of exercise science Pub Date : 2024-02-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Sarah N Lanham, Thomas R Nagel, Haresh Rochani, Bridget F Melton, Richard E Cleveland
{"title":"Strengthening First Responders' Coaching Proficiency through a Peer Fitness Leader Workshop: A Preliminary Efficacy Trial.","authors":"Sarah N Lanham, Thomas R Nagel, Haresh Rochani, Bridget F Melton, Richard E Cleveland","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>First responders require physical fitness to perform dangerous tasks in unpredictable environments. To promote physical fitness among first responders, many agencies use a peer fitness leader (PFL) approach; however, resources for the fitness, wellness, and health of PFLs are often minimal. This study's purpose was to investigate the effectiveness of a training workshop to increase PFL's training knowledge and coaching comfort (CC). Thirty-six PFLs (Experience: 14.6 ± 9.1 yrs; Age: 41.0 ± 9.8 yrs; BMI: 28.9 ± 7.0 kg·m<sup>-2</sup>) attended a one-day workshop. Paired samples <i>t</i>-tests assessed for differences between baseline and post-assessment knowledge scores. Pearson correlations described the bivariate relationship between baseline and post-assessment knowledge scores. Wilcoxon's Signed Rank Test determined associations between baseline and post-workshop CC variables. Spearman's Rho correlations described bivariate relationships between baseline and post-assessment values for each CC category. Kendall's Rank correlations investigated relationships between knowledge scores and total perceived CC for pre- and post-workshops. Statistical significance was set at <i>p</i> < 0.05. Results indicated an improvement from the baseline knowledge score (6.08 ± 1.46 points) and post-workshop knowledge score (7.03 ± 0.94 points); (<i>t</i> (25) = 3.85; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Similar trends were observed for all CC measures (<i>Z</i> > -3.42; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Differences were not observed between pre-workshop total CC and knowledge scores (<i>τ</i> = -0.03; <i>p</i> = 0.81) or following workshop completion (<i>τ</i> = -0.04; <i>p</i> = 0.76). Participants demonstrated varying exercise knowledge and CC, highlighting inconsistencies in exercise standards within first responder occupations. This investigation suggests the proposed pedagogy design may be a solution for agencies with limited budgets.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"17 3","pages":"298-307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

First responders require physical fitness to perform dangerous tasks in unpredictable environments. To promote physical fitness among first responders, many agencies use a peer fitness leader (PFL) approach; however, resources for the fitness, wellness, and health of PFLs are often minimal. This study's purpose was to investigate the effectiveness of a training workshop to increase PFL's training knowledge and coaching comfort (CC). Thirty-six PFLs (Experience: 14.6 ± 9.1 yrs; Age: 41.0 ± 9.8 yrs; BMI: 28.9 ± 7.0 kg·m-2) attended a one-day workshop. Paired samples t-tests assessed for differences between baseline and post-assessment knowledge scores. Pearson correlations described the bivariate relationship between baseline and post-assessment knowledge scores. Wilcoxon's Signed Rank Test determined associations between baseline and post-workshop CC variables. Spearman's Rho correlations described bivariate relationships between baseline and post-assessment values for each CC category. Kendall's Rank correlations investigated relationships between knowledge scores and total perceived CC for pre- and post-workshops. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results indicated an improvement from the baseline knowledge score (6.08 ± 1.46 points) and post-workshop knowledge score (7.03 ± 0.94 points); (t (25) = 3.85; p < 0.001). Similar trends were observed for all CC measures (Z > -3.42; p < 0.001). Differences were not observed between pre-workshop total CC and knowledge scores (τ = -0.03; p = 0.81) or following workshop completion (τ = -0.04; p = 0.76). Participants demonstrated varying exercise knowledge and CC, highlighting inconsistencies in exercise standards within first responder occupations. This investigation suggests the proposed pedagogy design may be a solution for agencies with limited budgets.

通过同伴健身领导者研讨会加强急救人员的教练能力:初步功效试验。
急救人员需要在不可预知的环境中执行危险任务,因此需要强健的体魄。为了促进第一反应人员的体能,许多机构采用了同伴体能领导者(PFL)的方法;但是,用于同伴体能领导者的体能、健康和保健的资源通常很少。本研究的目的是调查培训研讨会在提高 PFL 培训知识和教练舒适度 (CC) 方面的效果。36 名 PFL(经验:14.6 ± 9.1 年;年龄:41.0 ± 9.8 年;体重指数:28.9 ± 7.0 kg-m-2)参加了为期一天的研讨会。配对样本 t 检验评估了基线和评估后知识得分之间的差异。皮尔逊相关性描述了基线和评估后知识得分之间的双变量关系。Wilcoxon 符号秩检验确定了基线和评估后 CC 变量之间的关系。Spearman's Rho 相关性描述了每个 CC 类别的基线值和评估后值之间的双变量关系。Kendall's Rank 相关性研究了研修班前和研修班后知识得分与认知 CC 总分之间的关系。统计显著性以 p < 0.05 为标准。结果表明,基线知识得分(6.08 ± 1.46 分)与研修班后知识得分(7.03 ± 0.94 分)相比有所提高;(t (25) = 3.85;p < 0.001)。所有 CC 指标均呈现类似趋势(Z > -3.42;p <0.001)。工作坊前的 CC 总分和知识总分(τ = -0.03;p = 0.81)与工作坊结束后的 CC 总分(τ = -0.04;p = 0.76)之间未发现差异。参加者表现出不同的运动知识和 CC,突显了急救人员职业中运动标准的不一致。这项调查表明,建议的教学设计可能是预算有限的机构的一种解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信