Consumer and audiologist perspectives on hearables: a qualitative study.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
International Journal of Audiology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1080/14992027.2024.2341973
Ellen Bothe, Rebecca J Bennett, Melanie A Ferguson
{"title":"Consumer and audiologist perspectives on hearables: a qualitative study.","authors":"Ellen Bothe, Rebecca J Bennett, Melanie A Ferguson","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2341973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to explore (i) what adults with hearing difficulties want and need from hearables, which we defined as any non-medical personal sound amplification product, and (ii) what hearing care professionals think about hearables.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was an exploratory, qualitative study conducted using separate focus groups with adults with hearing difficulties and audiologists. Data were analysed inductively using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Participants were 12 adults with hearing difficulties and 6 audiologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adults with hearing difficulties expressed desire for trustworthy information and support, described evaluating hearables and other devices according to diverse personal criteria, and expressed willingness to vary their budget according to product quality. Audiologists expressed views that hearables are an inferior product but useful tool, that it is not necessarily their role to assist with hearables, that hearables are a source of uncertainty, and that the provision of hearables by audiologists is not currently practical.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adults with hearing difficulties may have complex reasons for considering hearables and may desire a high level of clinical support in this area. Ongoing research into the efficacy and effectiveness of hearables is needed together with research into effective strategies to incorporate hearables into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"374-383"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2341973","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to explore (i) what adults with hearing difficulties want and need from hearables, which we defined as any non-medical personal sound amplification product, and (ii) what hearing care professionals think about hearables.

Design: This was an exploratory, qualitative study conducted using separate focus groups with adults with hearing difficulties and audiologists. Data were analysed inductively using reflexive thematic analysis.

Study sample: Participants were 12 adults with hearing difficulties and 6 audiologists.

Results: Adults with hearing difficulties expressed desire for trustworthy information and support, described evaluating hearables and other devices according to diverse personal criteria, and expressed willingness to vary their budget according to product quality. Audiologists expressed views that hearables are an inferior product but useful tool, that it is not necessarily their role to assist with hearables, that hearables are a source of uncertainty, and that the provision of hearables by audiologists is not currently practical.

Conclusion: Adults with hearing difficulties may have complex reasons for considering hearables and may desire a high level of clinical support in this area. Ongoing research into the efficacy and effectiveness of hearables is needed together with research into effective strategies to incorporate hearables into clinical practice.

消费者和听力学家对可听设备的看法:一项定性研究。
目的我们的目的是:(i) 有听力障碍的成年人对可听设备(我们将其定义为任何非医用的个人扩音产品)的期望和需求;(ii) 听力保健专业人员对可听设备的看法:设计:这是一项探索性的定性研究,分别与听力有困难的成年人和听力学家进行焦点小组讨论。研究样本:研究样本:12 名听力障碍成人和 6 名听力学家:结果:有听力障碍的成年人表示希望获得值得信赖的信息和支持,他们描述了根据不同的个人标准评估听力设备和其他设备的情况,并表示愿意根据产品质量改变预算。听力学家认为,听力设备是一种劣质产品,但却是有用的工具;听力学家的职责不一定是为听力设备提供帮助;听力设备是不确定因素的来源;听力学家提供听力设备目前还不现实:结论:有听力障碍的成年人考虑使用助听器的原因可能很复杂,他们可能希望在这方面得到高水平的临床支持。需要对可听设备的功效和效果进行持续研究,同时研究将可听设备纳入临床实践的有效策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信