Comparative Efficacy of Ferrous, Ferric and Liposomal Iron Preparations for Prophylaxis in Infants.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Indian pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-07-15 Epub Date: 2024-04-22
Betül Orhan Kiliç, Dilek Konuksever, Namik Yasar Özbek
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy of Ferrous, Ferric and Liposomal Iron Preparations for Prophylaxis in Infants.","authors":"Betül Orhan Kiliç, Dilek Konuksever, Namik Yasar Özbek","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the efficacy of different oral iron preparations prescribed for prevention of iron deficiency anemia in healthy infants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study enrolled infants aged between 6 and 12 months who were initiated on iron prophylaxis at four months of age. Enrolled children consistently used specific iron preparations (ferrous, ferric or liposomal iron) and had their complete blood counts and serum ferritin levels assessed within the 6-12 month timeframe. Blood values and iron prophylaxis type (ferrous (Fe+2), ferric (Fe+3), liposomal iron) were recorded. Chi-square test was used to compare the hemoglobin and ferritin levels levels between groups. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses assessed the risk of anemia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 371 children (ferrous sulphate - 60, iron hydroxide-polymaltose complex - 137 and liposomal ferric pyrophosphate - 174) with a mean (SD) age 9.1 (1.3) mo. Iron deficiency in different groups were: liposomal iron (46.0%), ferric iron (44.5%), and ferrous iron (5.0%). Mean (SD) serum ferritin levels (µg/L) were higher in the ferrous group [30.1 (10.8)] compared to infants receiving ferric [17.6 (14.50)] and liposomal iron [15.4 (12.1)] (P < 0.001). Mean (SD) hemoglobin levels (g/dL) were significantly higher in the ferrous group [12.4 (0.8)] compared to ferric [11.9 (1.1)] and liposomal iron group [12.0 (1.1)]; P =0.008. Multiple regression analysis showed that ferrous group was associated with a lower risk of iron deficiency [OR (95% CI) 0.04 (0.01-0.15), P < 0.001].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ferrous iron demonstrated superior efficacy compared to ferric and liposomal iron. Further studies are needed to establish alternative iron preprations in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":13291,"journal":{"name":"Indian pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"621-626"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of different oral iron preparations prescribed for prevention of iron deficiency anemia in healthy infants.

Methods: This retrospective study enrolled infants aged between 6 and 12 months who were initiated on iron prophylaxis at four months of age. Enrolled children consistently used specific iron preparations (ferrous, ferric or liposomal iron) and had their complete blood counts and serum ferritin levels assessed within the 6-12 month timeframe. Blood values and iron prophylaxis type (ferrous (Fe+2), ferric (Fe+3), liposomal iron) were recorded. Chi-square test was used to compare the hemoglobin and ferritin levels levels between groups. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses assessed the risk of anemia.

Results: The study included 371 children (ferrous sulphate - 60, iron hydroxide-polymaltose complex - 137 and liposomal ferric pyrophosphate - 174) with a mean (SD) age 9.1 (1.3) mo. Iron deficiency in different groups were: liposomal iron (46.0%), ferric iron (44.5%), and ferrous iron (5.0%). Mean (SD) serum ferritin levels (µg/L) were higher in the ferrous group [30.1 (10.8)] compared to infants receiving ferric [17.6 (14.50)] and liposomal iron [15.4 (12.1)] (P < 0.001). Mean (SD) hemoglobin levels (g/dL) were significantly higher in the ferrous group [12.4 (0.8)] compared to ferric [11.9 (1.1)] and liposomal iron group [12.0 (1.1)]; P =0.008. Multiple regression analysis showed that ferrous group was associated with a lower risk of iron deficiency [OR (95% CI) 0.04 (0.01-0.15), P < 0.001].

Conclusion: Ferrous iron demonstrated superior efficacy compared to ferric and liposomal iron. Further studies are needed to establish alternative iron preprations in children.

用于婴儿预防的亚铁、铁和脂质体铁制剂的功效比较。
研究目的本研究旨在评估不同口服铁制剂对预防健康婴儿缺铁性贫血的疗效:这项回顾性研究招募了 6 到 12 个月大的婴儿,这些婴儿在 4 个月大时开始接受铁剂预防治疗。入组儿童一直使用特定的铁制剂(亚铁、铁或脂质体铁),并在 6-12 个月的时间范围内对其全血计数和血清铁蛋白水平进行了评估。记录了血值和铁预防类型(亚铁(Fe+2)、铁(Fe+3)、脂质体铁)。采用卡方检验比较不同组间的血红蛋白和铁蛋白水平。单变量和多变量回归分析评估了贫血的风险:研究包括 371 名平均(标清)年龄为 9.1 (1.3) 个月的儿童(硫酸亚铁-60 名,氢氧化铁-多聚麦芽糖复合物-137 名,焦磷酸铁脂质体-174 名)。各组的铁缺乏率分别为:脂质体铁(46.0%)、铁(44.5%)和亚铁(5.0%)。与接受铁剂[17.6 (14.50)]和脂质体铁剂[15.4 (12.1)]的婴儿相比,亚铁组[30.1 (10.8)]的平均(标清)血清铁蛋白水平(微克/升)较高(P < 0.001)。与铁剂组[11.9 (1.1)]和脂质体铁剂组[12.0 (1.1)]相比,亚铁组[12.4 (0.8)]的平均(标清)血红蛋白水平(g/dL)明显更高;P =0.008。多元回归分析显示,亚铁组患缺铁症的风险较低[OR (95% CI) 0.04 (0.01-0.15), P < 0.001]:结论:特定类型的气道异常在 TBFVL 中可能具有特征性的图形模式,TBFVL 模式可能预示着随访中气道异常的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian pediatrics
Indian pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
344
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The general objective of Indian Pediatrics is "To promote the science and practice of Pediatrics." An important guiding principle has been the simultaneous need to inform, educate and entertain the target audience. The specific key objectives are: -To publish original, relevant, well researched peer reviewed articles on issues related to child health. -To provide continuing education to support informed clinical decisions and research. -To foster responsible and balanced debate on controversial issues that affect child health, including non-clinical areas such as medical education, ethics, law, environment and economics. -To achieve the highest level of ethical medical journalism and to produce a publication that is timely, credible and enjoyable to read.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信