A Randomized Trial of Inspiratory Training in Children and Adolescents With Obesity.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Childhood Obesity Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1089/chi.2023.0183
Jason E Lang, Veronica M Carrion, Dharini M Bhammar, Janna B Howard, Sarah C Armstrong
{"title":"A Randomized Trial of Inspiratory Training in Children and Adolescents With Obesity.","authors":"Jason E Lang, Veronica M Carrion, Dharini M Bhammar, Janna B Howard, Sarah C Armstrong","doi":"10.1089/chi.2023.0183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Children with obesity suffer excess dyspnea that contributes to sedentariness. Developing innovative strategies to increase exercise tolerance and participation in children with obesity is a high priority. Because inspiratory training (IT) has reduced dyspnea, we sought to assess IT in children with obesity. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We conducted a 6-week randomized IT trial involving 8- to 17-year-olds with obesity. Participants were randomized 1:1 to either high [75% of maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP)] or low resistance control (15% of MIP) three times weekly. Assessments included adherence, patient satisfaction, and changes in inspiratory strength and endurance, dyspnea scores and total activity level. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among 27 randomized, 24 (89%) completed the intervention. Total session adherence was 72% which did not differ between treatment groups. IT was safe, and more than 90% felt IT benefitted breathing and general health. IT led to a mean improvement (95% CI) in inspiratory strength measured by MIP of 10.0 cm H<sub>2</sub>O (-3.5, 23.6; paired <i>t</i>-test, <i>p</i> = 0.139) and inspiratory endurance of 8.9 (1.0, 16.8; paired <i>t</i>-test, <i>p</i> = 0.028); however, there was no significant difference between high- and low-treatment groups. IT led to significant reductions in dyspnea with daily activity (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and in prospectively reported dyspnea during exercise (<i>p</i> = 0.024). Among the high- versus low-treatment group, we noted a trend for reduced dyspnea with daily activity (<i>p</i> = 0.071) and increased daily steps (865 vs. -51, <i>p</i> = 0.079). <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> IT is safe and feasible for children with obesity and holds promise for reducing dyspnea and improving healthy activity in children with obesity. Breathe-Fit trial NCT05412134.</p>","PeriodicalId":48842,"journal":{"name":"Childhood Obesity","volume":" ","pages":"517-525"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Childhood Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/chi.2023.0183","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Children with obesity suffer excess dyspnea that contributes to sedentariness. Developing innovative strategies to increase exercise tolerance and participation in children with obesity is a high priority. Because inspiratory training (IT) has reduced dyspnea, we sought to assess IT in children with obesity. Methods: We conducted a 6-week randomized IT trial involving 8- to 17-year-olds with obesity. Participants were randomized 1:1 to either high [75% of maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP)] or low resistance control (15% of MIP) three times weekly. Assessments included adherence, patient satisfaction, and changes in inspiratory strength and endurance, dyspnea scores and total activity level. Results: Among 27 randomized, 24 (89%) completed the intervention. Total session adherence was 72% which did not differ between treatment groups. IT was safe, and more than 90% felt IT benefitted breathing and general health. IT led to a mean improvement (95% CI) in inspiratory strength measured by MIP of 10.0 cm H2O (-3.5, 23.6; paired t-test, p = 0.139) and inspiratory endurance of 8.9 (1.0, 16.8; paired t-test, p = 0.028); however, there was no significant difference between high- and low-treatment groups. IT led to significant reductions in dyspnea with daily activity (p < 0.001) and in prospectively reported dyspnea during exercise (p = 0.024). Among the high- versus low-treatment group, we noted a trend for reduced dyspnea with daily activity (p = 0.071) and increased daily steps (865 vs. -51, p = 0.079). Discussion: IT is safe and feasible for children with obesity and holds promise for reducing dyspnea and improving healthy activity in children with obesity. Breathe-Fit trial NCT05412134.

针对肥胖儿童和青少年的吸气训练随机试验。
引言肥胖症儿童呼吸困难,导致久坐不动。开发创新策略以提高肥胖症儿童的运动耐受力和参与度是当务之急。由于吸气训练(IT)能减轻呼吸困难,我们试图对肥胖症儿童进行吸气训练评估。方法:我们对 8 至 17 岁的肥胖症儿童进行了为期 6 周的随机 IT 试验。参与者按 1:1 随机分配到高阻力控制(最大吸气压力 (MIP) 的 75%)或低阻力控制(MIP 的 15%)中,每周三次。评估内容包括依从性、患者满意度以及吸气强度和耐力、呼吸困难评分和总活动量的变化。结果:在随机抽取的 27 人中,24 人(89%)完成了干预。总坚持率为 72%,治疗组之间没有差异。信息技术是安全的,90%以上的人认为信息技术有益于呼吸和总体健康。通过 MIP 测量,信息技术使吸气强度平均提高(95% CI)10.0 cm H2O(-3.5,23.6;配对 t 检验,p = 0.139),吸气耐力平均提高 8.9(1.0,16.8;配对 t 检验,p = 0.028);但是,高治疗组和低治疗组之间没有显著差异。IT 能明显减轻日常活动时的呼吸困难(P = 0.024)。在高治疗组和低治疗组中,我们注意到日常活动呼吸困难有减少的趋势(p = 0.071),每日步数有增加的趋势(865 对 -51,p = 0.079)。讨论信息技术对肥胖症儿童安全可行,有望减轻肥胖症儿童的呼吸困难并改善其健康活动。呼吸-健身 "试验 NCT05412134。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Childhood Obesity
Childhood Obesity PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Childhood Obesity is the only peer-reviewed journal that delivers actionable, real-world obesity prevention and weight management strategies for children and adolescents. Health disparities and cultural sensitivities are addressed, and plans and protocols are recommended to effect change at the family, school, and community level. The Journal also reports on the problem of access to effective healthcare and delivers evidence-based solutions to overcome these barriers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信