A Simplified Protocol for Tracheostomy Decannulation in Patients Weaned off Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation.

IF 1 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-02-05 eCollection Date: 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1776720
K Devaraja, C S Majitha, Kailesh Pujary, Dipak Ranjan Nayak, Shwethapriya Rao
{"title":"A Simplified Protocol for Tracheostomy Decannulation in Patients Weaned off Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation.","authors":"K Devaraja, C S Majitha, Kailesh Pujary, Dipak Ranjan Nayak, Shwethapriya Rao","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1776720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  The criteria for the removal of the tracheostomy tube (decannulation) vary from center to center. Some perform an endoscopic evaluation under anesthesia or computed tomography, which adds to the cost and discomfort. We use a simple two-part protocol to determine the eligibility and carry out the decannulation: part I consists of airway and swallowing assessment through an office-based flexible laryngotracheoscopy, and part II involves a tracheostomy capping trial. <b>Objective</b>  The primary objective was to determine the safety and efficacy of the simplified decannulation protocol followed at our center among the patients who were weaned off the mechanical ventilator and exhibited good swallowing function clinically. <b>Methods</b>  Of the patients considered for decannulation between November 1st, 2018, and October 31st, 2020, those who had undergone tracheostomy for prolonged mechanical ventilation were included. The efficacy to predict successful decannulation was calculated by the decannulation rate among patients who had been deemed eligible for decannulation in part I of the protocol, and the safety profile was defined by the protocol's ability to correctly predict the chances of risk-free decannulation among those submitted to part II of the protocol. <b>Results</b>  Among the 48 patients included (mean age: 46.5 years; male-to-female ratio: 3:1), the efficacy of our protocol in predicting the successful decannulation was of 87.5%, and it was was safe or reliable in 95.45%. Also, in our cohort, the decannulation success and the duration of tracheotomy dependence were significantly affected by the neurological status of the patients. <b>Conclusion</b>  The decannulation protocol consisting of office-based flexible laryngotracheoscopy and capping trial of the tracheostomy tube can safely and effectively aid the decannulation process.</p>","PeriodicalId":13731,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11008947/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1776720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction  The criteria for the removal of the tracheostomy tube (decannulation) vary from center to center. Some perform an endoscopic evaluation under anesthesia or computed tomography, which adds to the cost and discomfort. We use a simple two-part protocol to determine the eligibility and carry out the decannulation: part I consists of airway and swallowing assessment through an office-based flexible laryngotracheoscopy, and part II involves a tracheostomy capping trial. Objective  The primary objective was to determine the safety and efficacy of the simplified decannulation protocol followed at our center among the patients who were weaned off the mechanical ventilator and exhibited good swallowing function clinically. Methods  Of the patients considered for decannulation between November 1st, 2018, and October 31st, 2020, those who had undergone tracheostomy for prolonged mechanical ventilation were included. The efficacy to predict successful decannulation was calculated by the decannulation rate among patients who had been deemed eligible for decannulation in part I of the protocol, and the safety profile was defined by the protocol's ability to correctly predict the chances of risk-free decannulation among those submitted to part II of the protocol. Results  Among the 48 patients included (mean age: 46.5 years; male-to-female ratio: 3:1), the efficacy of our protocol in predicting the successful decannulation was of 87.5%, and it was was safe or reliable in 95.45%. Also, in our cohort, the decannulation success and the duration of tracheotomy dependence were significantly affected by the neurological status of the patients. Conclusion  The decannulation protocol consisting of office-based flexible laryngotracheoscopy and capping trial of the tracheostomy tube can safely and effectively aid the decannulation process.

为长期机械通气断奶患者解除气管插管的简化方案。
导言:拔除气管造口管(取消封管)的标准因医疗中心而异。有些中心在麻醉或计算机断层扫描下进行内窥镜评估,这增加了费用和不适感。我们采用一个简单的两部分方案来确定是否符合条件并实施拔管:第一部分包括通过诊室柔性喉气管镜进行气道和吞咽评估,第二部分包括气管造口封堵试验。目的 主要目的是确定本中心对已脱离机械呼吸机并在临床上表现出良好吞咽功能的患者所采用的简化气管切开方案的安全性和有效性。方法 在 2018 年 11 月 1 日至 2020 年 10 月 31 日期间考虑停用的患者中,纳入了因长期机械通气而接受气管切开术的患者。根据方案第一部分中被认为符合终止阉割条件的患者的终止阉割率计算预测成功终止阉割的有效性,根据方案正确预测提交方案第二部分的患者中无风险终止阉割机会的能力定义安全性概况。结果 在纳入的 48 名患者中(平均年龄:46.5 岁;男女比例:3:1),我们的方案在预测成功拔管方面的有效率为 87.5%,在 95.45% 的患者中是安全或可靠的。此外,在我们的队列中,气管切开的成功率和气管切开依赖的持续时间受到患者神经状况的显著影响。结论 由诊室柔性喉气管镜检查和气管造口导管封盖试验组成的封堵方案可以安全有效地帮助封堵过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信