Quantifying Cigarette and e-Cigarette Marketing Exposure Among Chinese Adolescents Using Ecological Momentary Assessment.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Lauren Czaplicki, Hannah E Barker, Johannes Thrul, Yuxian Cui, Tingzhong Yang, Joanna E Cohen
{"title":"Quantifying Cigarette and e-Cigarette Marketing Exposure Among Chinese Adolescents Using Ecological Momentary Assessment.","authors":"Lauren Czaplicki, Hannah E Barker, Johannes Thrul, Yuxian Cui, Tingzhong Yang, Joanna E Cohen","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Addressing cigarette and e-cigarette use in China is key to reducing the global tobacco epidemic. Marketing exposure is one causal factor for adolescent smoking and e-cigarette use. Currently, China restricts cigarette and e-cigarette ads in public places and online; however, there may not be full policy compliance. We collected real-time data in the natural environment to estimate how much and where Chinese adolescents-a group susceptible to smoking and e-cigarette use-are exposed to cigarette and e-cigarette marketing to inform policy responses.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>In June 2022, we conducted a 7-day ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study with 15-16-year-olds (n = 96) across eight Chinese cities. Participants completed up to 42 EMA surveys (six per day), sent at random intervals outside of school hours. In each survey, participants reported whether they saw (1) displays and (2) ads in the past hour (none, cigarette, e-cigarette, both) in the past hour. We also captured the source of cigarette/e-cigarette ad exposure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants were exposed to cigarette and/or e-cigarette displays (89.6%) or ads (79.2%) more than 7 days. On average, participants reported past-hour exposure to displays 12.7 times and past-hour exposure to ads 10.8 times over the week. The most common sources of cigarette ads were public places (eg, kiosks, supermarkets); the most common sources of e-cigarette ad exposure were social media/internet or e-cigarette stores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings highlight the need to enhance enforcement of restrictions on cigarette and e-cigarette ads in public places and online in China and extend restrictions to ban displays.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Marketing exposure is a causal factor in youth smoking and e-cigarette use. We used EMA to estimate cigarette and e-cigarette display and ad exposure among Chinese adolescents. On average, participants reported past-hour exposure to cigarette and/or e-cigarette displays 13 times and past-hour exposure to cigarette and/or e-cigarette ads 11 times more than 1 week. Most saw ads in public places and online. Results suggest strengthening implementation of China's ban on cigarette and e-cigarette ads in public places and online and banning product displays. These are policy responses that can contribute to reducing adolescent cigarette and e-cigarette uptake in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":"1480-1488"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11494615/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae103","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Addressing cigarette and e-cigarette use in China is key to reducing the global tobacco epidemic. Marketing exposure is one causal factor for adolescent smoking and e-cigarette use. Currently, China restricts cigarette and e-cigarette ads in public places and online; however, there may not be full policy compliance. We collected real-time data in the natural environment to estimate how much and where Chinese adolescents-a group susceptible to smoking and e-cigarette use-are exposed to cigarette and e-cigarette marketing to inform policy responses.

Aims and methods: In June 2022, we conducted a 7-day ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study with 15-16-year-olds (n = 96) across eight Chinese cities. Participants completed up to 42 EMA surveys (six per day), sent at random intervals outside of school hours. In each survey, participants reported whether they saw (1) displays and (2) ads in the past hour (none, cigarette, e-cigarette, both) in the past hour. We also captured the source of cigarette/e-cigarette ad exposure.

Results: Most participants were exposed to cigarette and/or e-cigarette displays (89.6%) or ads (79.2%) more than 7 days. On average, participants reported past-hour exposure to displays 12.7 times and past-hour exposure to ads 10.8 times over the week. The most common sources of cigarette ads were public places (eg, kiosks, supermarkets); the most common sources of e-cigarette ad exposure were social media/internet or e-cigarette stores.

Conclusions: Findings highlight the need to enhance enforcement of restrictions on cigarette and e-cigarette ads in public places and online in China and extend restrictions to ban displays.

Implications: Marketing exposure is a causal factor in youth smoking and e-cigarette use. We used EMA to estimate cigarette and e-cigarette display and ad exposure among Chinese adolescents. On average, participants reported past-hour exposure to cigarette and/or e-cigarette displays 13 times and past-hour exposure to cigarette and/or e-cigarette ads 11 times more than 1 week. Most saw ads in public places and online. Results suggest strengthening implementation of China's ban on cigarette and e-cigarette ads in public places and online and banning product displays. These are policy responses that can contribute to reducing adolescent cigarette and e-cigarette uptake in China.

利用生态瞬间评估量化中国青少年的卷烟和电子烟营销接触。
导言:在中国解决卷烟和电子烟使用问题是减少全球烟草流行的关键。营销接触是青少年吸烟和使用电子烟的诱因之一。目前,中国限制在公共场所和网络上发布香烟和电子烟广告,但政策可能并未得到完全遵守。我们收集了自然环境中的实时数据,以估计中国青少年--一个容易吸烟和使用电子烟的群体--接触卷烟和电子烟营销的程度和地点,从而为政策应对提供参考:2022年6月,我们在中国8个城市对15-16岁的青少年(96人)进行了为期7天的生态瞬间评估(EMA)研究。参与者完成了多达 42 份 EMA 调查(每天 6 份),这些调查是在课余时间随机发送的。在每次调查中,参与者都要报告他们在过去一小时内是否看到(1)展示广告和(2)广告(无、香烟、电子烟、两者都有)。我们还记录了接触香烟/电子烟广告的来源:结果:大多数参与者在七天内接触过香烟和/或电子烟展示(89.6%)或广告(79.2%)。平均而言,参与者在一周内每小时接触展示品 12.7 次,每小时接触广告 10.8 次。最常见的香烟广告来源是公共场所(如售货亭、超市);最常见的电子烟广告来源是社交媒体/互联网或电子烟商店:结论:研究结果突出表明,中国有必要加强对公共场所和网络上香烟和电子烟广告的限制,并将限制范围扩大到禁止展示:影响:营销接触是青少年吸烟和使用电子烟的一个因果因素。我们使用生态瞬间评估来估计中国青少年的卷烟和电子烟展示及广告暴露。平均而言,参与者在一周内过去一小时接触香烟和/或电子烟展示13次,过去一小时接触香烟和/或电子烟广告11次。大多数人都在公共场所和网络上看到过广告。研究结果表明,中国应加强对公共场所和网络香烟和电子烟广告禁令的执行力度,并禁止产品展示。这些都是有助于减少中国青少年吸食香烟和电子烟的政策应对措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信