Transurethral En Bloc Resection Versus Standard Resection of Bladder Tumour: A Randomised, Multicentre, Phase 3 Trial

IF 25.3 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
{"title":"Transurethral En Bloc Resection Versus Standard Resection of Bladder Tumour: A Randomised, Multicentre, Phase 3 Trial","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.eururo.2024.04.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objective</h3><p>Conventionally, standard resection (SR) is performed by resecting the bladder tumour in a piecemeal manner. En bloc resection of the bladder tumour (ERBT) has been proposed as an alternative technique in treating non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). The objective of this study is to investigate whether ERBT could improve the 1-yr recurrence rate of NMIBC, as compared with SR.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial was conducted in Hong Kong. Adults with bladder tumour(s) of ≤ 3cm were enrolled from April 2017 to December 2020, and followed up until 1 yr after surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either ERBT or SR in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was 1-yr recurrence rate. A modified intention-to-treat analysis on patients with histologically confirmed NMIBC was performed. The main secondary outcomes included detrusor muscle sampling rate, operative time, hospital stay, 30-d complications, any residual or upstaging of disease upon second-look transurethral resection, and 1-yr progression rate.</p></div><div><h3>Key Findings and Limitations</h3><p>A total of 350 patients underwent randomisation, and 276 patients were histologically confirmed to have NMIBC. At 1 yr, 31 patients in the ERBT group and 46 in the SR group developed recurrence; the Kaplan-Meier estimate of 1- yr recurrence rates were 29% (95% confidence interval, 18–37) in the ERBT group and 38% (95% confidence interval, 28–46) in the SR group (<em>p</em> = 0.007). Upon a subgroup analysis, patients with 1–3 cm tumour, single tumour, Ta disease, or intermediate-risk NMIBC had a significant benefit from ERBT. None of the patients in the ERBT group and three patients in the SR group developed progression to muscle-invasive bladder cancer; the Kaplan-Meier estimates of 1-yr progression rates were 0% in the ERBT group and 2.6% (95% confidence interval, 0–5.5) in the SR group (<em>p</em> = 0.065). The median operative time was 28 min (interquartile range, 20–45) in the ERBT group and 22 min (interquartile range, 15–30) in the SR group (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). All other secondary outcomes were similar in the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Clinical Implications</h3><p>In patients with NMIBC of ≤ 3cm, ERBT resulted in a significant reduction in the 1-yr recurrence rate when compared with SR. The study results support ERBT as the first-line surgical treatment for patients with bladder tumours of≤ 3cm.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12223,"journal":{"name":"European urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":25.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283824023212/pdfft?md5=1f91f32c5ea400283f59db91ca36e377&pid=1-s2.0-S0302283824023212-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283824023212","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objective

Conventionally, standard resection (SR) is performed by resecting the bladder tumour in a piecemeal manner. En bloc resection of the bladder tumour (ERBT) has been proposed as an alternative technique in treating non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). The objective of this study is to investigate whether ERBT could improve the 1-yr recurrence rate of NMIBC, as compared with SR.

Methods

A multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial was conducted in Hong Kong. Adults with bladder tumour(s) of ≤ 3cm were enrolled from April 2017 to December 2020, and followed up until 1 yr after surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either ERBT or SR in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was 1-yr recurrence rate. A modified intention-to-treat analysis on patients with histologically confirmed NMIBC was performed. The main secondary outcomes included detrusor muscle sampling rate, operative time, hospital stay, 30-d complications, any residual or upstaging of disease upon second-look transurethral resection, and 1-yr progression rate.

Key Findings and Limitations

A total of 350 patients underwent randomisation, and 276 patients were histologically confirmed to have NMIBC. At 1 yr, 31 patients in the ERBT group and 46 in the SR group developed recurrence; the Kaplan-Meier estimate of 1- yr recurrence rates were 29% (95% confidence interval, 18–37) in the ERBT group and 38% (95% confidence interval, 28–46) in the SR group (p = 0.007). Upon a subgroup analysis, patients with 1–3 cm tumour, single tumour, Ta disease, or intermediate-risk NMIBC had a significant benefit from ERBT. None of the patients in the ERBT group and three patients in the SR group developed progression to muscle-invasive bladder cancer; the Kaplan-Meier estimates of 1-yr progression rates were 0% in the ERBT group and 2.6% (95% confidence interval, 0–5.5) in the SR group (p = 0.065). The median operative time was 28 min (interquartile range, 20–45) in the ERBT group and 22 min (interquartile range, 15–30) in the SR group (p < 0.001). All other secondary outcomes were similar in the two groups.

Conclusions and Clinical Implications

In patients with NMIBC of ≤ 3cm, ERBT resulted in a significant reduction in the 1-yr recurrence rate when compared with SR. The study results support ERBT as the first-line surgical treatment for patients with bladder tumours of≤ 3cm.

经尿道膀胱肿瘤整体切除术与标准切除术:随机、多中心、3 期试验。
背景:传统的标准切除术(SR)是将膀胱肿瘤零散切除。膀胱肿瘤整体切除术(ERBT)已被提出作为治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)的替代技术:研究ERBT与SR相比能否提高NMIBC的1年复发率:在香港进行了一项多中心、随机、3 期试验。2017年4月至2020年12月,膀胱肿瘤≤3厘米的成人患者入组,并随访至术后1年:患者按1:1的比例随机分配接受ERBT或SR治疗:主要结果为术后1年的复发率。对组织学确诊的 NMIBC 患者进行了修改后的意向治疗分析。主要次要结果包括:逼尿肌取样率、手术时间、住院时间、30 天并发症、经尿道切除术后的任何残留或上行病变以及 1 年进展率:共有350名患者接受了随机分组,276名患者经组织学证实患有NMIBC。1年后,ERBT组有31名患者复发,SR组有46名患者复发;ERBT组1年复发率的Kaplan-Meier估计值为29%(95%置信区间,18-37),SR组为38%(95%置信区间,28-46)(P = 0.007)。在亚组分析中,1-3 厘米肿瘤、单发肿瘤、Ta 病或中危 NMIBC 患者从 ERBT 中获益显著。ERBT组和SR组分别有3名患者恶化为肌肉浸润性膀胱癌;ERBT组1年恶化率的Kaplan-Meier估计值分别为0%和2.6%(95%置信区间,0-5.5)(p = 0.065)。ERBT 组的中位手术时间为 28 分钟(四分位数间距为 20-45),SR 组为 22 分钟(四分位数间距为 15-30)(p < 0.001)。两组的所有其他次要结果相似:在≤3厘米的NMIBC患者中,ERBT与SR相比可显著降低1年复发率(由GRF/ECS、RGC资助,参考号:24116518;ClinicalTrials.gov编号:NCT02993211)。患者摘要:传统上,非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的治疗方法是零碎切除膀胱肿瘤。在这项研究中,我们发现整体切除术(即一次性切除膀胱肿瘤)可降低非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的1年复发率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European urology
European urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
43.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1753
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: European Urology is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original articles and reviews on a broad spectrum of urological issues. Covering topics such as oncology, impotence, infertility, pediatrics, lithiasis and endourology, the journal also highlights recent advances in techniques, instrumentation, surgery, and pediatric urology. This comprehensive approach provides readers with an in-depth guide to international developments in urology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信