Agreement of Serial iCare HOME2 and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry

IF 2.8 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
{"title":"Agreement of Serial iCare HOME2 and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ogla.2024.04.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To assess agreement of iCare HOME2 and Goldmann applanation tonometry over a wide range of intraocular pressure (IOP).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A prospective, observational cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><div>Twenty-six adult patients undergoing intravitreal injection, which temporarily raises IOP, were recruited from the Palo Alto Medical Foundation Retina Clinic between October 2022 and February 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Subjects had serial iCare HOME2 (IOP<sub>I</sub>) and Goldmann applanation (IOP<sub>G</sub>) IOP measurements before and at 0 and 5 to 10 minutes after injection. Baseline IOPs and pachymetry were taken in both eyes.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Correlation between IOP<sub>I</sub> and IOP<sub>G</sub> was tested by within-subjects intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for repeated measures. Agreement between IOP<sub>I</sub> and IOP<sub>G</sub> was evaluated by a Bland–Altman plot with correction for multiple measurements. The difference between IOP<sub>I</sub> and IOP<sub>G</sub> was evaluated between eyes at baseline (Pearson’s <em>r</em>) and within the injected eye over different timepoints (ICC for absolute agreement). Linear regression was used to evaluate the effects of age, sex, glaucoma, and corneal thickness.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean IOP<sub>I</sub> and IOP<sub>G</sub> were 25.3 (range: 9–55) and 23.5 (range: 8–56) mmHg, respectively. The correlation between IOP<sub>I</sub> and IOP<sub>G</sub> was 0.99 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The mean difference (IOP<sub>G</sub> − IOP<sub>I</sub>) was 2.2 mmHg (95% limits of agreement: −3.4 to 7.8 mmHg). The bias in measurements was correlated between eyes (<em>r</em>, 0.68; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and in the injected eye across all timepoints (ICC, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75–0.93), but did not show a relationship with age, sex, glaucoma, or corneal thickness.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>IOP<sub>I</sub> and IOP<sub>G</sub> showed excellent correlation; however, there was a stable bias toward IOP<sub>G</sub> being higher than IOP<sub>I</sub> over a large range of IOP.</div></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><div>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19519,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","volume":"7 5","pages":"Pages 440-444"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589419624000711/pdfft?md5=fc3c2c08e518d4425589fd4f26b26a1f&pid=1-s2.0-S2589419624000711-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589419624000711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To assess agreement of iCare HOME2 and Goldmann applanation tonometry over a wide range of intraocular pressure (IOP).

Design

A prospective, observational cohort study.

Subjects

Twenty-six adult patients undergoing intravitreal injection, which temporarily raises IOP, were recruited from the Palo Alto Medical Foundation Retina Clinic between October 2022 and February 2023.

Methods

Subjects had serial iCare HOME2 (IOPI) and Goldmann applanation (IOPG) IOP measurements before and at 0 and 5 to 10 minutes after injection. Baseline IOPs and pachymetry were taken in both eyes.

Main Outcome Measures

Correlation between IOPI and IOPG was tested by within-subjects intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for repeated measures. Agreement between IOPI and IOPG was evaluated by a Bland–Altman plot with correction for multiple measurements. The difference between IOPI and IOPG was evaluated between eyes at baseline (Pearson’s r) and within the injected eye over different timepoints (ICC for absolute agreement). Linear regression was used to evaluate the effects of age, sex, glaucoma, and corneal thickness.

Results

The mean IOPI and IOPG were 25.3 (range: 9–55) and 23.5 (range: 8–56) mmHg, respectively. The correlation between IOPI and IOPG was 0.99 (P < 0.001). The mean difference (IOPG − IOPI) was 2.2 mmHg (95% limits of agreement: −3.4 to 7.8 mmHg). The bias in measurements was correlated between eyes (r, 0.68; P < 0.001) and in the injected eye across all timepoints (ICC, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75–0.93), but did not show a relationship with age, sex, glaucoma, or corneal thickness.

Conclusions

IOPI and IOPG showed excellent correlation; however, there was a stable bias toward IOPG being higher than IOPI over a large range of IOP.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
系列 iCare HOME2 和戈德曼眼压计的一致性。
目的:评估 iCare HOME2 和戈德曼眼压计在不同眼压范围内的一致性:前瞻性、观察性队列研究:在 2022 年 10 月至 2023 年 2 月期间,从帕洛阿尔托医疗基金会视网膜诊所招募了 26 名接受玻璃体内注射的成年患者,注射后眼压会暂时升高:受试者在注射前、注射后 0 分钟和 5-10 分钟接受连续的 iCare HOME2 (IOPI) 和戈德曼角膜塑形镜 (IOPG) 眼压测量。对双眼进行基线眼压和眼底测量:IOPI 和 IOPG 之间的相关性通过重复测量的受试者内类相关系数 (ICC) 进行检验。IOPI 和 IOPG 之间的一致性通过校正多次测量的 Bland-Altman 图进行评估。眼压指数和眼压计之间的差异在基线(Pearson's r)和注射眼内不同时间点(绝对一致的 ICC)之间进行评估。线性回归用于评估年龄、性别、青光眼和角膜厚度的影响:平均 IOPI 和 IOPG 分别为 25.3(范围:9 - 55)mmHg 和 23.5(范围:8 - 56)mmHg。IOPI 和 IOPG 之间的相关性为 0.99(pG - IOPI),为 2.2 mmHg(95% 的一致性范围:-3.4 至 7.8 mmHg)。两眼间的测量偏差具有相关性(r:0.68, p结论:IOPI 和 IOPG 显示出很好的相关性,但在很大的眼压范围内,IOPG 比 IOPI 高的偏差是稳定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
140
审稿时长
46 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信