Efficacy of laser biostimulation for mandibular narrow ridges treated with one-stage ridge splitting and two-implant overdentures: A one-year preliminary study

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
{"title":"Efficacy of laser biostimulation for mandibular narrow ridges treated with one-stage ridge splitting and two-implant overdentures: A one-year preliminary study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.03.045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Statement of problem</h3><div>The management of patients with narrow-mandibular ridges who seek prosthetic rehabilitation is challenging.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div><span>The purpose of this one-year preliminary clinical study was to compare the effects of laser biostimulation<span> and a placebo on peri-implant tissues for a 2-implant-retained mandibular polyetheretherketone (PEEK) </span></span>overdenture on expanded narrow mandibular ridges.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div><span>Eighteen completely edentulous participants were enrolled for mandibular ridge splitting in the canine regions, followed by expansion, the placement of implants, and the application of a bone graft<span>. In the test group, laser therapy was applied labially and lingually at the surgical sites, while a placebo laser was used in the control group. PEEK overdentures retained by LOCATOR attachments were provided after 6 months. Clinical evaluations were performed using probing depth, plaque, bleeding, and </span></span>gingival indices<span><span> at insertion and 3, 6, and 12 months after insertion. Vertical bone loss (VBL) was evaluated with periapical radiograph at insertion and 6 and 12 months later. The Mann-Whitney test was used to test the difference between the 2 different groups at each evaluation time (α=.05). The Friedman-test was used, followed by </span>Wilcoxon signed rank test, to test the change over time in the same group, and the Bonferroni adjusted significance level was used for multiple comparisons.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Some clinical and radiographic parameters significantly increased with time in both groups (<em>P</em>&lt;.001). Significant differences between the 2 groups were revealed in bleeding scores at 3 months (<em>P</em>=.006) and 6 months (<em>P</em>=.018). Also, significant differences between the 2 groups were observed in gingival scores at 3 months (<em>P</em>=.002), 6 months (<em>P</em>=.015), and 12 months (<em>P</em>=.019) after overdenture insertion in favor of the laser group. Peri-implant VBL was significantly higher in the non-laser group at 6 months (<em>P</em>=.015), and 12 months (<em>P</em>=.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Within the limitations of this clinical study, respecting the small sample size and the short follow-up period, laser bio-stimulation after 1-stage ridge splitting in narrow mandibular ridges enhanced the soft and hard peri implant tissues when used with LOCATOR attachments and PEEK overdentures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391324002397","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of problem

The management of patients with narrow-mandibular ridges who seek prosthetic rehabilitation is challenging.

Purpose

The purpose of this one-year preliminary clinical study was to compare the effects of laser biostimulation and a placebo on peri-implant tissues for a 2-implant-retained mandibular polyetheretherketone (PEEK) overdenture on expanded narrow mandibular ridges.

Material and methods

Eighteen completely edentulous participants were enrolled for mandibular ridge splitting in the canine regions, followed by expansion, the placement of implants, and the application of a bone graft. In the test group, laser therapy was applied labially and lingually at the surgical sites, while a placebo laser was used in the control group. PEEK overdentures retained by LOCATOR attachments were provided after 6 months. Clinical evaluations were performed using probing depth, plaque, bleeding, and gingival indices at insertion and 3, 6, and 12 months after insertion. Vertical bone loss (VBL) was evaluated with periapical radiograph at insertion and 6 and 12 months later. The Mann-Whitney test was used to test the difference between the 2 different groups at each evaluation time (α=.05). The Friedman-test was used, followed by Wilcoxon signed rank test, to test the change over time in the same group, and the Bonferroni adjusted significance level was used for multiple comparisons.

Results

Some clinical and radiographic parameters significantly increased with time in both groups (P<.001). Significant differences between the 2 groups were revealed in bleeding scores at 3 months (P=.006) and 6 months (P=.018). Also, significant differences between the 2 groups were observed in gingival scores at 3 months (P=.002), 6 months (P=.015), and 12 months (P=.019) after overdenture insertion in favor of the laser group. Peri-implant VBL was significantly higher in the non-laser group at 6 months (P=.015), and 12 months (P=.001).

Conclusions

Within the limitations of this clinical study, respecting the small sample size and the short follow-up period, laser bio-stimulation after 1-stage ridge splitting in narrow mandibular ridges enhanced the soft and hard peri implant tissues when used with LOCATOR attachments and PEEK overdentures.
激光生物刺激治疗下颌窄脊的疗效:一期牙脊分离和双种植体覆盖义齿:为期一年的初步研究。
目的:这项为期一年的初步临床研究的目的是比较激光生物刺激和安慰剂对膨体下颌窄脊2种植体固位下颌聚醚醚酮(PEEK)覆盖义齿种植体周围组织的影响:招募了 18 名完全无牙颌的参与者,对犬齿区域的下颌嵴进行分割,然后进行扩张、植入种植体和骨移植。试验组在手术部位的唇侧和舌侧使用激光治疗,而对照组则使用安慰剂激光。6 个月后,提供由 LOCATOR 附件固定的 PEEK 覆盖义齿。临床评估采用的是安装时、安装后 3、6 和 12 个月的探诊深度、牙菌斑、出血和牙龈指数。垂直骨质流失(VBL)的评估是在安装时、安装后 6 个月和 12 个月通过根尖周X光片进行的。采用 Mann-Whitney 检验来检验两个不同组别在每个评估时间的差异(α=.05)。使用弗里德曼检验(Friedman-test)和Wilcoxon符号秩检验(Wilcoxon signed rank test)检验同组随时间的变化,多重比较使用Bonferroni调整显著性水平:结果:随着时间的推移,两组患者的部分临床和影像学指标均有明显增加(PC结论:在本临床研究的局限性条件下,本组患者的部分临床和影像学指标均有明显增加:在这项临床研究的局限性范围内,考虑到样本量较小和随访时间较短,在下颌窄嵴处进行1阶段嵴分裂后,与LOCATOR连接体和PEEK覆盖义齿一起使用时,激光生物刺激增强了种植体周围的软组织和硬组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信