In vitro evaluation of the carcinogenic potential of perfluorinated chemicals.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-22 DOI:10.14573/altex.2310281
Monica Vaccari, Stefania Serra, Andrea Ranzi, Federico Aldrovandi, Giangabriele Maffei, Maria G Mascolo, Ada Mescoli, Elisa Montanari, Gelsomina Pillo, Francesca Rotondo, Ivan Scaroni, Lorenzo Vaccari, Cristina Zanzi, Tony Fletcher, Martin Paparella, Annamaria Colacci
{"title":"In vitro evaluation of the carcinogenic potential of perfluorinated chemicals.","authors":"Monica Vaccari, Stefania Serra, Andrea Ranzi, Federico Aldrovandi, Giangabriele Maffei, Maria G Mascolo, Ada Mescoli, Elisa Montanari, Gelsomina Pillo, Francesca Rotondo, Ivan Scaroni, Lorenzo Vaccari, Cristina Zanzi, Tony Fletcher, Martin Paparella, Annamaria Colacci","doi":"10.14573/altex.2310281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) are the major components of long-chain per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS), known for their chemical stability and environmental persistence. Even if PFOA and PFOS have been phased out or are limited in use, they still represent a concern for human and environmental health. Several studies have been per­formed to highlight the toxicological behavior of these chemicals and their mode of action (MoA). Data have suggested a causal association between PFOA or PFOS exposure and carcinogenicity in humans, but the outcomes of epidemiological studies showed some inconsistency. Moreover, the hypothesized MoA based on animal studies is considered not relevant for human cancer. To improve the knowledge on PFAS toxicology and contribute to the weight of evidence for the regu­latory classification of PFAS, we used the BALB/c 3T3 cell transformation assay (CTA), an in vitro model under consideration to be included in an integrated approach to testing and assessment for non-genotoxic carcinogens (NGTxCs). PFOS and PFOA were tested at several concentrations using a validated experimental protocol. Our results demonstrate that PFOA does not induce cell transformation, whereas PFOS exposure induced a concentration-related increase of type III foci. Malignant foci formation was triggered at PFOS concentrations equal to or higher than 50 ppm and was not directly associated with cytotoxicity or proliferation induction. The divergent CTA outcomes suggest that different molecular events could be responsible for the toxicological profiles of PFOS and PFOA, which were not fully captured in our study.</p>","PeriodicalId":51231,"journal":{"name":"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation","volume":" ","pages":"439-456"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2310281","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) are the major components of long-chain per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS), known for their chemical stability and environmental persistence. Even if PFOA and PFOS have been phased out or are limited in use, they still represent a concern for human and environmental health. Several studies have been per­formed to highlight the toxicological behavior of these chemicals and their mode of action (MoA). Data have suggested a causal association between PFOA or PFOS exposure and carcinogenicity in humans, but the outcomes of epidemiological studies showed some inconsistency. Moreover, the hypothesized MoA based on animal studies is considered not relevant for human cancer. To improve the knowledge on PFAS toxicology and contribute to the weight of evidence for the regu­latory classification of PFAS, we used the BALB/c 3T3 cell transformation assay (CTA), an in vitro model under consideration to be included in an integrated approach to testing and assessment for non-genotoxic carcinogens (NGTxCs). PFOS and PFOA were tested at several concentrations using a validated experimental protocol. Our results demonstrate that PFOA does not induce cell transformation, whereas PFOS exposure induced a concentration-related increase of type III foci. Malignant foci formation was triggered at PFOS concentrations equal to or higher than 50 ppm and was not directly associated with cytotoxicity or proliferation induction. The divergent CTA outcomes suggest that different molecular events could be responsible for the toxicological profiles of PFOS and PFOA, which were not fully captured in our study.

全氟化学品致癌潜力的体外评估。
全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)和全氟辛酸(PFOA)是长链全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的主要成分,以化学稳定性和环境持久性著称。即使全氟辛酸和全氟辛烷磺酸已被淘汰或被限制使用,它们仍然是人类和环境健康的隐患。已有多项研究强调了这些化学品的毒理学行为及其作用模式(MoA)。数据表明,接触全氟辛烷磺酸或全氟辛烷磺酸与人类致癌之间存在因果关系,但流行病学研究结果显示出一定的不一致性。此外,基于动物研究的假定致癌作用被认为与人类癌症无关。为了增进对全氟辛烷磺酸毒理学的了解,并为全氟辛烷磺酸的监管分类提供更多证据,我们使用了 BALB/c 3T3 细胞转化试验(CTA),这是一种正在考虑纳入非遗传毒性致癌物(NGTxCs)测试和评估综合方法的体外模型。我们采用经过验证的实验方案对多种浓度的全氟辛烷磺酸和全氟辛酸进行了测试。结果表明,全氟辛烷磺酸不能诱导细胞转化,而接触全氟辛烷磺酸会导致与浓度相关的第三型病灶的增加。当全氟辛烷磺酸的浓度等于或高于百万分之 50 时,恶性病灶就会形成。它与细胞毒性或增殖诱导没有直接关系。不同的 CTA 结果表明,全氟辛烷磺酸和全氟辛酸的毒理学特征可能是由不同的分子事件引起的,而我们的研究并未完全捕捉到这些分子事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation
Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.90%
发文量
89
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ALTEX publishes original articles, short communications, reviews, as well as news and comments and meeting reports. Manuscripts submitted to ALTEX are evaluated by two expert reviewers. The evaluation takes into account the scientific merit of a manuscript and its contribution to animal welfare and the 3R principle.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信