How does social contingency facilitate vocabulary development?

IF 3.1 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Elena Luchkina, Fei Xu
{"title":"How does social contingency facilitate vocabulary development?","authors":"Elena Luchkina,&nbsp;Fei Xu","doi":"10.1111/desc.13525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Previous research shows that infants of parents who are more likely to engage in socially contingent interactions with them tend to have larger vocabularies. An open question is <i>how</i> social contingency facilitates vocabulary growth. One possibility is that parents who speak in response to their infants more often produce larger <i>amount of language input</i>, which accelerates vocabulary growth. Another possibility is that the <i>simplicity of contingent language input</i> is especially suitable to support early word learning. A third possibility is that more evidence of the communicative nature of language, achieved through <i>frequent contingent responses</i>, helps infants build a link between their own words or vocalizations and others’ behaviors. This link may lead to a better understanding of the communicative nature of language and further language advances, including vocabulary growth. To distinguish between these hypotheses, we analyzed the relations between parent–infant interactions when infants were 9 months and their vocabulary size at 12 months, using a naturalistic corpus. Our findings show that the frequency of parents’ verbal contingent responses predicts receptive vocabulary size at 12 months and this predictive relation is unlikely to be due to the amount of language input or the simplicity of language within socially contingent interactions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Research Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Infants of parents who respond to their vocalizations more often during the first year of life tend to have larger vocabularies in the second year.</li>\n \n <li>It is an open question what drives the predictive relation between parents’ responsiveness and infants’ vocabulary; we tested three hypotheses that offer competing explanations.</li>\n \n <li>More responsive parents might provide (1) more language input, (2) simpler language input, (3) more evidence of the communicative nature of language (via frequent responses).</li>\n \n <li>We find support for the third hypothesis; the frequency of parents’ responses predicts infants’ vocabularies above and beyond the amount and simplicity of language input.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"27 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/desc.13525","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research shows that infants of parents who are more likely to engage in socially contingent interactions with them tend to have larger vocabularies. An open question is how social contingency facilitates vocabulary growth. One possibility is that parents who speak in response to their infants more often produce larger amount of language input, which accelerates vocabulary growth. Another possibility is that the simplicity of contingent language input is especially suitable to support early word learning. A third possibility is that more evidence of the communicative nature of language, achieved through frequent contingent responses, helps infants build a link between their own words or vocalizations and others’ behaviors. This link may lead to a better understanding of the communicative nature of language and further language advances, including vocabulary growth. To distinguish between these hypotheses, we analyzed the relations between parent–infant interactions when infants were 9 months and their vocabulary size at 12 months, using a naturalistic corpus. Our findings show that the frequency of parents’ verbal contingent responses predicts receptive vocabulary size at 12 months and this predictive relation is unlikely to be due to the amount of language input or the simplicity of language within socially contingent interactions.

Research Highlights

  • Infants of parents who respond to their vocalizations more often during the first year of life tend to have larger vocabularies in the second year.
  • It is an open question what drives the predictive relation between parents’ responsiveness and infants’ vocabulary; we tested three hypotheses that offer competing explanations.
  • More responsive parents might provide (1) more language input, (2) simpler language input, (3) more evidence of the communicative nature of language (via frequent responses).
  • We find support for the third hypothesis; the frequency of parents’ responses predicts infants’ vocabularies above and beyond the amount and simplicity of language input.
社会偶然性如何促进词汇发展?
以往的研究表明,父母更倾向于与婴儿进行社会应急互动的婴儿,其词汇量往往更大。一个悬而未决的问题是,社交应变如何促进词汇量的增长。一种可能是,父母更经常地对婴儿说话,会产生更多的语言输入,从而加速词汇量的增长。另一种可能是,简单的应急语言输入特别适合支持早期词汇学习。第三种可能是,通过频繁的或然反应,更多语言交流性质的证据有助于婴儿在自己的语言或发声与他人的行为之间建立联系。这种联系可能会使婴儿更好地理解语言的交际性,并进一步促进语言的发展,包括词汇量的增长。为了区分这些假设,我们使用自然语料库分析了婴儿 9 个月时父母与婴儿之间的互动与他们 12 个月时词汇量之间的关系。我们的研究结果表明,父母的口头或然反应频率可预测婴儿 12 个月时的接受词汇量,而这种预测关系不太可能是由于语言输入量或社会或然互动中语言的简单性造成的。研究亮点:在婴儿出生后的第一年,如果父母对婴儿的发声反应更频繁,那么婴儿在第二年的词汇量往往会更大。父母的回应与婴儿词汇量之间的预测关系是一个未决问题;我们测试了三种假设,它们提供了相互竞争的解释。反应更灵敏的父母可能会提供:(1)更多的语言输入;(2)更简单的语言输入;(3)更多语言交流性质的证据(通过频繁的回应)。我们发现第三个假设得到了支持;父母的回应频率对婴儿词汇量的预测超过了语言输入的数量和简单程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: Developmental Science publishes cutting-edge theory and up-to-the-minute research on scientific developmental psychology from leading thinkers in the field. It is currently the only journal that specifically focuses on human developmental cognitive neuroscience. Coverage includes: - Clinical, computational and comparative approaches to development - Key advances in cognitive and social development - Developmental cognitive neuroscience - Functional neuroimaging of the developing brain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信