Discrepancies in Gleason score between needle core biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens with correlation between clinical and pathological staging.

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urologia Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-05 DOI:10.1177/03915603241244942
Vikram Singh, Kartik Sharma, Mahendra Singh, Shashank Shekhar Tripathi, Deepak Prakash Bhirud, Rahul Jena, Shiv Charan Navriya, Gautam Ram Choudhary, Arjun Singh Sandhu
{"title":"Discrepancies in Gleason score between needle core biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens with correlation between clinical and pathological staging.","authors":"Vikram Singh, Kartik Sharma, Mahendra Singh, Shashank Shekhar Tripathi, Deepak Prakash Bhirud, Rahul Jena, Shiv Charan Navriya, Gautam Ram Choudhary, Arjun Singh Sandhu","doi":"10.1177/03915603241244942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The studies have shown that GS given after assessment of the entire prostate gland on the radical prostatectomy specimen may differ from GS given after examination of a small sample from needle core biopsy. We conducted this study to assess discrepancies in the Gleason score between NCB and RP specimens and to find out the correlation between the clinical stage and pathological stage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 174 patients with carcinoma prostate which underwent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Pre-operative Gleason score was determined on 12-core biopsy samples under trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) guidance. The Gleason score obtained from the radical prostatectomy specimen was compared with that of the NCB Gleason score to find out differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The preoperative Gleason score (GS) ranges from 6 to 9 with a mean GS of 6.97 ± 1.02. The post-operative GS ranges between 6 and 10 with mean and GS of 7.5 ± 1.10. On the pre-operative assessment of biopsy specimens, 70 (43.2%) patients had a GS of 6, while 44 patients had a GS of 7 (27.1%) and 48 (29.8%) patients had a GS of more than 7. On the postoperative assessment of specimens, 31 (19.1%) patients had post-operative GS of 6, while 66 (41%) patients had GS of 7 and 74 (41.1%) patients had GS of more than 7. When pre-operative GS and post-operative GS were compared, no changes were observed in the GS of 79 patients, whereas 83 patients showed the difference in GS, with 75 patients showing up-gradation and eight patients marked as down-graded.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>concordance between biopsy and the pathology results directly affects the prognosis of the patient. The results of our study demonstrated the rate of discordance between Gleason scores obtained from transrectal prostate biopsy and RP surgical specimens. This rate brings into question the accuracy of the chosen treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":23574,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Journal","volume":" ","pages":"518-524"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603241244942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The studies have shown that GS given after assessment of the entire prostate gland on the radical prostatectomy specimen may differ from GS given after examination of a small sample from needle core biopsy. We conducted this study to assess discrepancies in the Gleason score between NCB and RP specimens and to find out the correlation between the clinical stage and pathological stage.

Methods: The study included 174 patients with carcinoma prostate which underwent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Pre-operative Gleason score was determined on 12-core biopsy samples under trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) guidance. The Gleason score obtained from the radical prostatectomy specimen was compared with that of the NCB Gleason score to find out differences.

Results: The preoperative Gleason score (GS) ranges from 6 to 9 with a mean GS of 6.97 ± 1.02. The post-operative GS ranges between 6 and 10 with mean and GS of 7.5 ± 1.10. On the pre-operative assessment of biopsy specimens, 70 (43.2%) patients had a GS of 6, while 44 patients had a GS of 7 (27.1%) and 48 (29.8%) patients had a GS of more than 7. On the postoperative assessment of specimens, 31 (19.1%) patients had post-operative GS of 6, while 66 (41%) patients had GS of 7 and 74 (41.1%) patients had GS of more than 7. When pre-operative GS and post-operative GS were compared, no changes were observed in the GS of 79 patients, whereas 83 patients showed the difference in GS, with 75 patients showing up-gradation and eight patients marked as down-graded.

Conclusion: concordance between biopsy and the pathology results directly affects the prognosis of the patient. The results of our study demonstrated the rate of discordance between Gleason scores obtained from transrectal prostate biopsy and RP surgical specimens. This rate brings into question the accuracy of the chosen treatment.

针芯活检和根治性前列腺切除术标本的格里森评分差异与临床和病理分期的相关性。
背景:研究表明,在对根治性前列腺切除术标本的整个前列腺进行评估后给出的GS可能不同于对针芯活检的小样本进行检查后给出的GS。我们进行了这项研究,以评估 NCB 和 RP 标本的 Gleason 评分差异,并找出临床分期与病理分期之间的相关性:研究纳入了174名接受机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术(RARP)的前列腺癌患者。术前在经直肠超声(TRUS)引导下对 12 核活检样本进行格里森评分。将根治性前列腺切除术标本的格里森评分与NCB格里森评分进行比较,以找出差异:结果:术前格里森评分(GS)范围在 6 到 9 之间,平均值为 6.97 ± 1.02。术后的 GS 介于 6 到 10 之间,平均 GS 为 7.5 ± 1.10。在对活检标本进行术前评估时,70 名患者(43.2%)的 GS 为 6,44 名患者(27.1%)的 GS 为 7,48 名患者(29.8%)的 GS 超过 7。在术后标本评估中,31 例(19.1%)患者的术后 GS 为 6,66 例(41%)患者的 GS 为 7,74 例(41.1%)患者的 GS 超过 7。当比较术前 GS 和术后 GS 时,79 例患者的 GS 没有变化,而 83 例患者的 GS 有差异,其中 75 例患者的 GS 上调,8 例患者的 GS 下调。我们的研究结果表明,经直肠前列腺活检获得的 Gleason 评分与 RP 手术标本之间存在不一致。这一比例令人怀疑所选治疗方法的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urologia Journal
Urologia Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
66
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信