Infantile nystagmus syndrome: An observational, retrospective, multicenter study.

Abstract

Significance: This multicenter study assessed clinical and psychological aspects of infantile nystagmus syndrome (INS) focusing on its management and nonsurgical treatment.

Purpose: This study aimed to assess clinical features, management, relationship life, and psychological impact in a group of patients with nystagmus onset in pediatric age.

Methods: This observational study included patients diagnosed with INS referred to two Italian centers from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2020. Ophthalmologic and orthoptic features and impact of visual function on quality of life, according to nystagmus-specific nystagmus quality of life questionnaire, were analyzed within the overall sample and in any of INS subgroups.

Results: Forty-three patients were included; 65.1% of them had idiopathic INS (IINS), and 34.9% had INS associated with ocular diseases (INSOD). The median age was 15.4 years (interquartile range [IQR], 10.4 to 17.3 years), significantly different between groups (median, 15.8 years among those with IINS vs. 12.3 years among those with INSOD; p<0.001). In the INSOD subgroup, strabismus was significantly more prevalent (93.3 vs. 57.1%; p=0.017). Binocular distance best-corrected visual acuity in primary position was significantly higher in the IINS subsample (p<0.001). Such behavior was further confirmed at anomalous head position evaluation (p<0.001). At near best-corrected visual acuity assessment, differences between groups were more remarkable in primary position (p<0.001) than in anomalous head position. Contrast sensitivity showed significantly higher values in the IINS subgroup (p<0.001). The nystagmus quality of life questionnaire disclosed a significantly lower score in IINS as compared with INSOD (median total score, 90.5 [IQR, 84 to 97] vs. 94 [IQR, 83.0 to 96.5]; p<0.001).

Conclusions: The IINS group showed significantly better ophthalmologic and orthoptic outcomes than the INSOD group. The psychological and quality-of-life impact was instead significantly greater in the IINS group. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first multicenter study investigating the clinical features of IIN and comparing the two main subgroups, IINS and INSOD.