Systematic review of the impact of protease-inhibitor-based combination antiretroviral therapy on renal transplant outcomes in recipients living with HIV infection.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Journal of Investigative Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-22 DOI:10.1177/10815589241252595
Brooke Milosh, Mona Bugaighis, Joseph Cervia
{"title":"Systematic review of the impact of protease-inhibitor-based combination antiretroviral therapy on renal transplant outcomes in recipients living with HIV infection.","authors":"Brooke Milosh, Mona Bugaighis, Joseph Cervia","doi":"10.1177/10815589241252595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advances in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment, including combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), have transformed HIV into a chronic condition. Kidney diseases cause morbidity and mortality in patients living with HIV (PLWH), though cART has permitted kidney transplants with acceptable post-transplant graft and patient survival. Risk of allograft rejection remains high, which may be related to interactions between cART, specifically protease inhibitors (PI), and immunosuppressants prescribed post-transplant. This systematic review evaluates renal transplant outcomes in PLWH treated with PI- vs non-PI-based cART. A search strategy was generated with terms related to renal transplant, HIV, and cART and run on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane. Studies were evaluated using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines on Covidence by two reviewers and then evaluated for bias. Of 803 studies, 9 were included. Included papers were prospective or retrospective cohort studies or chart reviews of adult patients. Outcome measures included acute graft rejection, graft survival, and patient survival. One study had significant results demonstrating that PI-based therapy was correlated with increased graft rejection rates. Two studies demonstrated significant graft survival benefit to non-PI-based therapy, while one demonstrated significant benefit to PI-based therapy. Two studies found significant patient survival benefit to non-PI-based therapy. For each outcome measure, remaining data suggested improved outcomes with non-PI-based therapies without achieving statistical significance. The results demonstrate superior outcomes in PLWH taking non-PI-based cART, though the paucity of significant results suggests that PLWH who require PI-based cART for virological control may continue their regimen safely post-kidney transplant.</p>","PeriodicalId":16112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"776-783"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10815589241252595","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advances in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment, including combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), have transformed HIV into a chronic condition. Kidney diseases cause morbidity and mortality in patients living with HIV (PLWH), though cART has permitted kidney transplants with acceptable post-transplant graft and patient survival. Risk of allograft rejection remains high, which may be related to interactions between cART, specifically protease inhibitors (PI), and immunosuppressants prescribed post-transplant. This systematic review evaluates renal transplant outcomes in PLWH treated with PI- vs non-PI-based cART. A search strategy was generated with terms related to renal transplant, HIV, and cART and run on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane. Studies were evaluated using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines on Covidence by two reviewers and then evaluated for bias. Of 803 studies, 9 were included. Included papers were prospective or retrospective cohort studies or chart reviews of adult patients. Outcome measures included acute graft rejection, graft survival, and patient survival. One study had significant results demonstrating that PI-based therapy was correlated with increased graft rejection rates. Two studies demonstrated significant graft survival benefit to non-PI-based therapy, while one demonstrated significant benefit to PI-based therapy. Two studies found significant patient survival benefit to non-PI-based therapy. For each outcome measure, remaining data suggested improved outcomes with non-PI-based therapies without achieving statistical significance. The results demonstrate superior outcomes in PLWH taking non-PI-based cART, though the paucity of significant results suggests that PLWH who require PI-based cART for virological control may continue their regimen safely post-kidney transplant.

基于蛋白酶抑制剂的联合抗逆转录病毒疗法对 HIV 感染受者肾移植结果影响的系统性综述。
人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)治疗的进步,包括抗逆转录病毒联合疗法(cART),已将 HIV 转变为一种慢性疾病。肾脏疾病导致艾滋病病毒感染者(PLWH)的发病率和死亡率,尽管 cART 使肾移植后移植物和患者的存活率达到了可接受的水平。异体移植排斥反应的风险仍然很高,这可能与 cART(特别是蛋白酶抑制剂 (PI))和移植后处方的免疫抑制剂之间的相互作用有关。本系统性综述评估了接受 PI 与非 PI 型 cART 治疗的 PLWH 的肾移植结果。我们使用与肾移植、HIV 和 cART 相关的术语制定了检索策略,并在 PubMed、Embase、Scopus 和 Cochrane 上进行了检索。由两名审稿人根据Covidence的PRISMA指南对研究进行评估,然后评估是否存在偏倚。在 803 项研究中,有 9 项被纳入。纳入的论文均为成人患者的前瞻性或回顾性队列研究或病历回顾。结果指标包括急性移植物排斥反应、移植物存活率和患者存活率。一项研究的重要结果表明,基于 PI 的治疗与移植物排斥率的增加有关。两项研究表明,非 PI 治疗对移植物存活率有明显益处,而一项研究表明,PI 治疗对移植物存活率有明显益处。两项研究发现,非 PI 治疗对患者的存活率有明显益处。在每项结果指标中,其余数据表明非 PI 治疗的结果有所改善,但未达到统计学意义。研究结果表明,接受非 PI 型 cART 治疗的 PLWH 可获得更好的疗效,但由于缺乏显著性结果,需要 PI 型 cART 来控制病毒的 PLWH 可在肾移植后继续安全地接受治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Investigative Medicine
Journal of Investigative Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Investigative Medicine (JIM) is the official publication of the American Federation for Medical Research. The journal is peer-reviewed and publishes high-quality original articles and reviews in the areas of basic, clinical, and translational medical research. JIM publishes on all topics and specialty areas that are critical to the conduct of the entire spectrum of biomedical research: from the translation of clinical observations at the bedside, to basic and animal research to clinical research and the implementation of innovative medical care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信