Unsettling Common Sense Assumptions about Intimate Partner Violence in the NICU.

Q2 Medicine
NeoReviews Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1542/neo.25-5-e245
Susanne Klawetter, Stéphanie Wahab, Ladawna Gievers
{"title":"Unsettling Common Sense Assumptions about Intimate Partner Violence in the NICU.","authors":"Susanne Klawetter, Stéphanie Wahab, Ladawna Gievers","doi":"10.1542/neo.25-5-e245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>NICU clinicians strive to provide family-centered care and often encounter complex and ethical challenges. Emerging evidence suggests that NICU clinicians likely interact with families experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV). However, little research and training exists to guide NICU clinicians in their thinking and practice in the midst of IPV. In this review, we use a structural violence framework to engage in a critical analysis of commonly held assumptions about IPV. These assumptions include an overreliance on binaries including male-female and offender-victim, the belief that people need to be rescued, prioritization of physical safety, and the notion that mandatory reporting helps families who experience violence. By reexamining these assumptions, this review guides NICU clinicians to consider alternatives to carceral and punitive responses to IPV, such as transformative justice and reflexive engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":19465,"journal":{"name":"NeoReviews","volume":"25 5","pages":"e245-e253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11801410/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeoReviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/neo.25-5-e245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

NICU clinicians strive to provide family-centered care and often encounter complex and ethical challenges. Emerging evidence suggests that NICU clinicians likely interact with families experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV). However, little research and training exists to guide NICU clinicians in their thinking and practice in the midst of IPV. In this review, we use a structural violence framework to engage in a critical analysis of commonly held assumptions about IPV. These assumptions include an overreliance on binaries including male-female and offender-victim, the belief that people need to be rescued, prioritization of physical safety, and the notion that mandatory reporting helps families who experience violence. By reexamining these assumptions, this review guides NICU clinicians to consider alternatives to carceral and punitive responses to IPV, such as transformative justice and reflexive engagement.

打破关于新生儿重症监护室亲密伴侣暴力的常识性假设。
新生儿重症监护室的临床医生努力提供以家庭为中心的护理,并经常遇到复杂的伦理挑战。新的证据表明,新生儿重症监护室的临床医生可能会与遭受亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的家庭发生互动。然而,很少有研究和培训可以指导新生儿重症监护室临床医生在 IPV 情况下的思考和实践。在本综述中,我们使用了结构性暴力框架,对有关 IPV 的常见假设进行了批判性分析。这些假设包括过度依赖二元对立,包括男性-女性和犯罪者-受害者,认为人们需要被拯救,优先考虑人身安全,以及认为强制报告有助于遭受暴力的家庭。通过重新审视这些假设,本综述引导新生儿重症监护室的临床医生考虑对 IPV 采取非监禁和惩罚性的应对措施,如变革性正义和反思性参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NeoReviews
NeoReviews Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
110
期刊介绍: Co-edited by Alistair G.S. Philip, MD, FAAP, and William W. Hay Jr., MD, FAAP, NeoReviews each month delivers 3 to 4 clinical reviews, case discussions, basic science insights and "on the horizon" pieces. Written and edited by experts, these concise reviews are available to NeoReviews subscribers at http://neoreviews.aappublications.org. Since January 2009, all clinical articles have been mapped to the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) content specifications in neonatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信