Underdiagnosis of Borderline oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (BORSA) - Case series.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 PATHOLOGY
Malaysian Journal of Pathology Pub Date : 2024-04-01
N Samsudin, W C Chua, H Hasan, S A Hassan, Z Z Deris
{"title":"Underdiagnosis of Borderline oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (BORSA) - Case series.","authors":"N Samsudin, W C Chua, H Hasan, S A Hassan, Z Z Deris","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Borderline oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (BORSA) are mecA-negative strains with oxacillin minimum inhibitor concentration (MIC) close to the resistance breakpoint of ≥ 4μg/mL. Instead of producing penicillin-binding protein with low affinity to methicillin (oxacillin) mediated by mecA gene as in methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), BORSA strains are characterised by the hyperproduction of β-lactamase enzymes, thus able to break down methicillin. Common laboratory methods to detect MRSA such as cefoxitin disk diffusion alone may fail to detect methicillin resistance due to BORSA. We report five cases of BORSA blood-stream infections in a university teaching hospital. All isolates were found to be susceptible to cefoxitin using disk diffusion, resistant to oxacillin using automated MIC method, and did not harbour mecA gene. All patients were suscessfully treated with anti-MRSA antibiotics, and removal of primary sources were done if identified. A more cost-effective method for screening and diagnosis of BORSA is needed in addition to cefoxitin disk diffusion test, in order to monitor the spread, and to enable routine detection and treatment of this pathogen.</p>","PeriodicalId":48723,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Pathology","volume":"46 1","pages":"95-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Borderline oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (BORSA) are mecA-negative strains with oxacillin minimum inhibitor concentration (MIC) close to the resistance breakpoint of ≥ 4μg/mL. Instead of producing penicillin-binding protein with low affinity to methicillin (oxacillin) mediated by mecA gene as in methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), BORSA strains are characterised by the hyperproduction of β-lactamase enzymes, thus able to break down methicillin. Common laboratory methods to detect MRSA such as cefoxitin disk diffusion alone may fail to detect methicillin resistance due to BORSA. We report five cases of BORSA blood-stream infections in a university teaching hospital. All isolates were found to be susceptible to cefoxitin using disk diffusion, resistant to oxacillin using automated MIC method, and did not harbour mecA gene. All patients were suscessfully treated with anti-MRSA antibiotics, and removal of primary sources were done if identified. A more cost-effective method for screening and diagnosis of BORSA is needed in addition to cefoxitin disk diffusion test, in order to monitor the spread, and to enable routine detection and treatment of this pathogen.

边缘型耐草青霉素金黄色葡萄球菌(BORSA)诊断不足--病例系列。
边缘型耐奥沙西林金黄色葡萄球菌(BORSA)是mecA阴性菌株,其奥沙西林最小抑菌浓度(MIC)接近耐药性断点≥4μg/mL。BORSA 菌株不像耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)那样通过 mecA 基因产生对甲氧西林(奥沙西林)亲和力低的青霉素结合蛋白,其特点是超量产生 β-内酰胺酶,从而能够分解甲氧西林。实验室检测 MRSA 的常用方法(如仅使用头孢西丁盘扩散法)可能无法检测出 BORSA 引起的甲氧西林耐药性。我们报告了一家大学教学医院的五例 BORSA 血流感染病例。所有分离菌株均对头孢西丁盘扩散法敏感,对奥沙西林自动 MIC 法耐药,且不携带 mecA 基因。所有患者均接受了抗 MRSA 抗生素治疗,并在发现原发感染源时进行了清除。除头孢西丁盘扩散试验外,还需要一种更具成本效益的方法来筛查和诊断 BORSA,以监测其传播情况,并对这种病原体进行常规检测和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The Malaysian Journal of Pathology is the official journal of the College of Pathologists, Academy of Medicine Malaysia. The primary purpose of The Journal is to publish the results of study and research in Pathology, especially those that have particular relevance to human disease occurring in Malaysia and other countries in this region. The term PATHOLOGY will be interpreted in its broadest sense to include Chemical Pathology, Cytology, Experimental Pathology, Forensic Pathology, Haematology, Histopathology, Immunology, Medical Microbiology and Parasitology. The Journal aims to bring under one cover publications of regional interest embracing the various sub-specialities of Pathology. It is expected that the articles published would be of value not only to pathologists, but also to medical practitioners in search of a scientific basis for the problems encountered in their practice, and to those with an interest in diseases which occur in the tropics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信