Effects of Supramaximal Anderson Quarter-squats as a Potentiating Stimulus on Discus Performance in Division I Throwers: A Pilot Study.

Q1 Health Professions
Ogochukwu I Nwachukwu, Mark Debeliso, Marcus M Lawrence
{"title":"Effects of Supramaximal Anderson Quarter-squats as a Potentiating Stimulus on Discus Performance in Division I Throwers: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Ogochukwu I Nwachukwu, Mark Debeliso, Marcus M Lawrence","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>No study has assessed supramaximal (over 100% 1RM) back squat variations as a potentiating stimulus in collegiate throwers. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that a supramaximal Anderson (bottom-up) quarter squat potentiating stimulus would improve discus throw performance in Division I throwers compared to a dynamic warm-up alone. Nine NCAA division I thrower athletes (age: 20.1±1.4 years; 1RM back squat/body weight: 2.5±0.4 kg) randomly completed two sessions separated by at least 72 hours. One session involved a standardized dynamic warm-up alone (DyWU) followed by three trials of maximal discus throwing. The other session involved a dynamic warm-up with a supramaximal (105% 1RM) Anderson (bottom-up) quarter-squat set of 5 repetitions post activation performance enhancement stimulus (DyWU+PAPE) followed by three trials of maximal discus throwing. A two-way (warm-up strategy x time) ANOVA with repeated measures for each time point was used, with significance set at p< 0.05. There were no significant (p> 0.05) differences between DyWU alone versus DyWU+PAPE stimulus for discus throw distances at either 8 min. (31.7±5.6 vs 30.6±6.5 meters, respectively; <i>d</i> = -0.18), 11 min. (33.4±3.6 vs 31.3±4.7 meters, respectively; <i>d</i> = -0.52), or 14 min. post warm-up (34.1±3.9 vs 32.3±5.3 meters, respectively; <i>d</i> = -0.40). Compared to a dynamic warm-up alone, supramaximal Anderson quarter-squats following a dynamic warm-up had trivial/small to moderate detrimental effects on discus throw performance between 8-14 minutes post stimuli in Division I trained throwers, likely due to excess fatigue/PAPE inhibition.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"17 6","pages":"99-114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042899/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

No study has assessed supramaximal (over 100% 1RM) back squat variations as a potentiating stimulus in collegiate throwers. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that a supramaximal Anderson (bottom-up) quarter squat potentiating stimulus would improve discus throw performance in Division I throwers compared to a dynamic warm-up alone. Nine NCAA division I thrower athletes (age: 20.1±1.4 years; 1RM back squat/body weight: 2.5±0.4 kg) randomly completed two sessions separated by at least 72 hours. One session involved a standardized dynamic warm-up alone (DyWU) followed by three trials of maximal discus throwing. The other session involved a dynamic warm-up with a supramaximal (105% 1RM) Anderson (bottom-up) quarter-squat set of 5 repetitions post activation performance enhancement stimulus (DyWU+PAPE) followed by three trials of maximal discus throwing. A two-way (warm-up strategy x time) ANOVA with repeated measures for each time point was used, with significance set at p< 0.05. There were no significant (p> 0.05) differences between DyWU alone versus DyWU+PAPE stimulus for discus throw distances at either 8 min. (31.7±5.6 vs 30.6±6.5 meters, respectively; d = -0.18), 11 min. (33.4±3.6 vs 31.3±4.7 meters, respectively; d = -0.52), or 14 min. post warm-up (34.1±3.9 vs 32.3±5.3 meters, respectively; d = -0.40). Compared to a dynamic warm-up alone, supramaximal Anderson quarter-squats following a dynamic warm-up had trivial/small to moderate detrimental effects on discus throw performance between 8-14 minutes post stimuli in Division I trained throwers, likely due to excess fatigue/PAPE inhibition.

超极限安德森屈体蹲作为一种强化刺激对 I 组掷铁饼运动员铁饼成绩的影响:试点研究。
目前还没有研究对大学生投掷运动员进行超大(超过 100% 1RM )深蹲变化作为增效刺激的评估。本研究的目的是测试一个假设,即与单独的动态热身相比,超大负荷安德森(自下而上)深蹲的潜能刺激将提高 I 组投掷运动员的铁饼投掷成绩。九名美国国家大学生体育协会 I 级投掷运动员(年龄:20.1±1.4 岁;1RM 后蹲/体重:2.5±0.4 公斤)随机完成了两次训练,每次训练至少间隔 72 小时。其中一次是单独进行标准化动态热身(DyWU),然后进行三次最大铁饼投掷试验。另一次训练则是在动态热身的基础上进行超极限(105% 1RM)安德森(自下而上)四分蹲训练,重复 5 次后进行激活性能增强刺激(DyWU+PAPE),然后进行三次最大铁饼投掷试验。采用双向(热身策略 x 时间)方差分析,对每个时间点进行重复测量,显著性设定为 p< 0.05。在热身后8分钟(分别为31.7±5.6米 vs 30.6±6.5米;d = -0.18)、11分钟(分别为33.4±3.6米 vs 31.3±4.7米;d = -0.52)或14分钟(分别为34.1±3.9米 vs 32.3±5.3米;d = -0.40),单独使用DyWU与DyWU+PAPE刺激在铁饼投掷距离上没有明显差异(p> 0.05)。与单独的动态热身相比,在动态热身后进行超大负荷安德森四分蹲对一级训练投掷运动员在刺激后 8-14 分钟内的铁饼投掷成绩有微不足道/小到中等程度的不利影响,这可能是由于过度疲劳/PAPE 抑制所致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信