Validation of Becton Dickinson Barricor tubes for use with Abbott Alinity and Siemens Atellica® highly sensitive cardiac troponin I measuring systems.

Q2 Medicine
Piotr Gajewski, Magdalena Krintus, Katarzyna Chudas, Rafal Pawlowski, Ewa Laskowska, Malgorzata Jasiewicz, Lukasz Szternel, Ahmad El-Essa, Jacek Kubica, Grazyna Sypniewska, Mauro Panteghini
{"title":"Validation of Becton Dickinson Barricor<sup>™</sup> tubes for use with Abbott Alinity<sup>™</sup> and Siemens Atellica<sup>®</sup> highly sensitive cardiac troponin I measuring systems.","authors":"Piotr Gajewski, Magdalena Krintus, Katarzyna Chudas, Rafal Pawlowski, Ewa Laskowska, Malgorzata Jasiewicz, Lukasz Szternel, Ahmad El-Essa, Jacek Kubica, Grazyna Sypniewska, Mauro Panteghini","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>BD Barricor<sup>™</sup> tubes have been proposed to decrease laboratory turnaround time (TAT). We analytically validated and then clinically verified these tubes for use with Abbott Alinity<sup>™</sup> and Siemens Atellica<sup>®</sup> highly sensitive cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assays.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>hs-cTnI measurements were undertaken in paired Barricor<sup>™</sup> and in-use PSTII<sup>™</sup> tubes on both systems. 359 matched samples with hs-cTnI levels between 3 and 15,000 ng/L (Atellica<sup>®</sup> values) were used to assess the hemolysis rate and make method comparisons. 599 paired patient samples were collected on emergency department (ED) admission to compare the performance of the rapid acute myocardial infarction (AMI) rule-out strategy based on hs-cTnI concentrations lower than recommended thresholds (<4 ng/L Alinity<sup>™</sup>; <5 ng/L Atellica<sup>®</sup>) when different tubes and systems were employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No between-tube differences in hemolysis rate were seen when free hemoglobin concentrations in plasma samples were ≥0.25 g/L, even if PSTII<sup>™</sup> showed a significant increase of hemolysis rate vs. Barricor<sup>™</sup> (31% vs. 22%, p=0.007) when a lower cut-off for hemolysis (≥0.11 g/L) was employed on the Atellica<sup>®</sup> detection system. The alternate use of these tubes did not influence the hs-cTnI results obtained from either of the two assays, which remained markedly biased (~40%) irrespective of the tube used. The expected optimal ability of very low hs-cTnI values on ED admission for ruling out AMI was confirmed by using both systems regardless of the tube type.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Barricor<sup>™</sup> and PSTII<sup>™</sup> tubes can provide analytically equivalent hs-cTnI results when used on either Alinity<sup>™</sup> or Atellica<sup>®</sup> hs-cTnI assays.</p>","PeriodicalId":37192,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","volume":"35 1","pages":"10-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11063784/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: BD Barricor tubes have been proposed to decrease laboratory turnaround time (TAT). We analytically validated and then clinically verified these tubes for use with Abbott Alinity and Siemens Atellica® highly sensitive cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assays.

Methods: hs-cTnI measurements were undertaken in paired Barricor and in-use PSTII tubes on both systems. 359 matched samples with hs-cTnI levels between 3 and 15,000 ng/L (Atellica® values) were used to assess the hemolysis rate and make method comparisons. 599 paired patient samples were collected on emergency department (ED) admission to compare the performance of the rapid acute myocardial infarction (AMI) rule-out strategy based on hs-cTnI concentrations lower than recommended thresholds (<4 ng/L Alinity; <5 ng/L Atellica®) when different tubes and systems were employed.

Results: No between-tube differences in hemolysis rate were seen when free hemoglobin concentrations in plasma samples were ≥0.25 g/L, even if PSTII showed a significant increase of hemolysis rate vs. Barricor (31% vs. 22%, p=0.007) when a lower cut-off for hemolysis (≥0.11 g/L) was employed on the Atellica® detection system. The alternate use of these tubes did not influence the hs-cTnI results obtained from either of the two assays, which remained markedly biased (~40%) irrespective of the tube used. The expected optimal ability of very low hs-cTnI values on ED admission for ruling out AMI was confirmed by using both systems regardless of the tube type.

Conclusions: Barricor and PSTII tubes can provide analytically equivalent hs-cTnI results when used on either Alinity or Atellica® hs-cTnI assays.

用于雅培 Alinity™ 和西门子 Atellica® 高灵敏度心肌肌钙蛋白 I 测量系统的 Becton Dickinson Barricor™ 试管的验证。
背景:BD Barricor™ 试管被建议用于缩短实验室周转时间 (TAT)。我们对这些试管与雅培 Alinity™ 和西门子 Atellica® 高灵敏度心肌肌钙蛋白 I(hs-cTnI)测定的配合使用进行了分析验证和临床验证。359 份 hs-cTnI 水平在 3 到 15,000 纳克/升(Atellica® 值)之间的配对样本用于评估溶血率和进行方法比较。在急诊科(ED)入院时收集了 599 份配对患者样本,以比较在使用不同试管和系统时,基于 hs-cTnI 浓度低于推荐阈值(™;®)的快速急性心肌梗死(AMI)排除策略的性能:结果:当血浆样本中游离血红蛋白浓度≥0.25 g/L时,不同试管之间的溶血率没有差异,即使在Atellica®检测系统中使用较低的溶血临界值(≥0.11 g/L)时,PSTII™与Barricor™相比溶血率显著增加(31% vs. 22%,p=0.007)。交替使用这些试管并不影响两种检测方法得出的 hs-cTnI 结果,无论使用哪种试管,hs-cTnI 结果仍有明显偏差(约 40%)。无论使用哪种试管,两种系统都证实了急诊室入院时极低的 hs-cTnI 值在排除急性心肌梗死方面的预期最佳能力:结论:在 Alinity™ 或 Atellica® hs-cTnI 检测仪上使用 Barricor™ 和 PSTII™ 试管可提供分析结果相当的 hs-cTnI 结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信