Comparing the Familiarity of the Basic and Clinical Faculty Members of Iran University of Medical Sciences with the Principles of Digital Professionalism.

Q2 Medicine
Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran Pub Date : 2024-02-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.47176/mjiri.38.15
Ali Kabir, Davood Rasouli, Kamran Soltani Arabshahi
{"title":"Comparing the Familiarity of the Basic and Clinical Faculty Members of Iran University of Medical Sciences with the Principles of Digital Professionalism.","authors":"Ali Kabir, Davood Rasouli, Kamran Soltani Arabshahi","doi":"10.47176/mjiri.38.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to the changing conditions of education, research, and treatment in the world, especially the recent pandemic, and more use of virtual space, there is a need for evaluation of digital professionalism in faculty members as the most influential people who have a direct and deep impact on the next generation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this analytical cross-sectional study that was conducted in 2023 on 149 faculty members of Iran University of Medical Sciences, they were invited to participate in the study through various methods (SMS, E-mail, and media messages). The link to the Persian standardized questionnaire was made available for participants. If a person received less than 70% of the score in each area, he/she would receive solutions to improve his/her situation in that area at the end of answering the questions. The self-administered questionnaire has 5 fields and 33 questions. Maximum scores were 10 points. Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients and statistical tests consisting of chi-square, t-test, Mann-Whitney U, one-way ANOVA, and Kruskal-Wallis H were used in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean overall score of people in principles of digital professionalism was 0.8. Women and basic sciences faculties had a significantly better status than men and clinical faculties in the principles of digital professionalism as a whole (<i>P</i> = 0.001 and <i>P</i> = 0.049, respectively). The domain of \"knowledge management and information literacy\" had significantly lower scores in professors in comparison with other degree (instructors, assistant professors, and associate professors (<i>P</i> = 0.039).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The mean score of the principles of digital professionalism is acceptable at 80%. Coherent, timely, and up-to-date training to ensure the effective, safe and appropriate use of digital technology, especially for men, professors and clinical faculty members who had a lower score than others, should be done.</p>","PeriodicalId":18361,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10999006/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.38.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Due to the changing conditions of education, research, and treatment in the world, especially the recent pandemic, and more use of virtual space, there is a need for evaluation of digital professionalism in faculty members as the most influential people who have a direct and deep impact on the next generation.

Methods: In this analytical cross-sectional study that was conducted in 2023 on 149 faculty members of Iran University of Medical Sciences, they were invited to participate in the study through various methods (SMS, E-mail, and media messages). The link to the Persian standardized questionnaire was made available for participants. If a person received less than 70% of the score in each area, he/she would receive solutions to improve his/her situation in that area at the end of answering the questions. The self-administered questionnaire has 5 fields and 33 questions. Maximum scores were 10 points. Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients and statistical tests consisting of chi-square, t-test, Mann-Whitney U, one-way ANOVA, and Kruskal-Wallis H were used in the analysis.

Results: The mean overall score of people in principles of digital professionalism was 0.8. Women and basic sciences faculties had a significantly better status than men and clinical faculties in the principles of digital professionalism as a whole (P = 0.001 and P = 0.049, respectively). The domain of "knowledge management and information literacy" had significantly lower scores in professors in comparison with other degree (instructors, assistant professors, and associate professors (P = 0.039).

Conclusion: The mean score of the principles of digital professionalism is acceptable at 80%. Coherent, timely, and up-to-date training to ensure the effective, safe and appropriate use of digital technology, especially for men, professors and clinical faculty members who had a lower score than others, should be done.

比较伊朗医科大学基础和临床教师对数字化专业原则的熟悉程度。
背景:由于世界教育、研究和治疗条件的变化,特别是最近的流行病,以及虚拟空间的更多使用,需要对教职员工的数字化职业素养进行评估,因为他们是对下一代产生直接而深刻影响的最有影响力的人:这项分析性横断面研究于 2023 年对伊朗医科大学的 149 名教职员工进行了调查,通过各种方法(短信、电子邮件和媒体信息)邀请他们参与研究。向参与者提供了波斯语标准化问卷的链接。如果某人在每个方面的得分低于 70%,他/她将在答题结束时收到改善其在该方面情况的解决方案。自填式问卷共有 5 栏 33 个问题。最高分为 10 分。分析中使用了 Spearman 和 Pearson 相关系数,以及由 chi-square、t 检验、Mann-Whitney U、单向方差分析和 Kruskal-Wallis H 组成的统计检验:人们在数字专业原则方面的平均总得分为 0.8。女性和基础科学教师在数字化职业素养原则方面的整体状况明显优于男性和临床教师(P = 0.001 和 P = 0.049)。在 "知识管理和信息素养 "领域,教授的得分明显低于其他学位(讲师、助理教授和副教授,P = 0.039):数字专业精神原则的平均得分在 80% 左右,是可以接受的。应开展连贯、及时和最新的培训,以确保有效、安全和适当地使用数字技术,尤其是针对得分低于其他教师的男性、教授和临床教师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信