Nurses' Assessment of Pain in Saudi Neonatal Intensive Care Units

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
{"title":"Nurses' Assessment of Pain in Saudi Neonatal Intensive Care Units","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Research reveals that neonatal pain management in </span>Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) is suboptimal. There is limited research that assessed NICU nurses’ pain assessment practices in Saudi Arabia.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To assess the nurses’ pain assessment practices in the NICU in Saudi Arabia.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This study used a descriptive cross-sectional design.</p></div><div><h3>Settings</h3><p>Research was conducted using an online survey.</p></div><div><h3>Participants/Subjects</h3><p>This study was carried out on 65 NICU nurses. The participants were recruited from one governmental and one private hospital in Saudi Arabia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data on pain assessment practices were collected, including the frequency of pain assessment, pain assessment scales used for preterm and term neonates, and pain assessment documentation. Data were analyzed using frequencies and percentages.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The majority of the participants (94%) routinely assessed pain and documented pain assessment (97%). One-third of the participants assessed pain regularly every hour (32%). The most used pain assessment scales for term neonates were the neonatal infant pain scale (40%) and the cry, required oxygen, increased vital signs, expression, and sleeplessness scale (23%). The most used pain assessment scales for preterm neonates were the neonatal infant pain scale (31%), the cry, required oxygen, increased vital signs, expression, sleeplessness scale (19%), and the premature infant pain profile (17%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>NICU nurses in Saudi Arabia consistently assessed for and documented pain; however, the tools chosen were sometimes suboptimal. A substantial number of NICU nurses used invalid tools to assess pain in term and preterm neonates. An interventional program is needed to enhance the use of evidence-based practice recommendations regarding neonatal pain assessment by nurses in the Neonatal Intensive Care Units in Saudi Arabia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":"25 4","pages":"Pages e320-e325"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904224001036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Research reveals that neonatal pain management in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) is suboptimal. There is limited research that assessed NICU nurses’ pain assessment practices in Saudi Arabia.

Aim

To assess the nurses’ pain assessment practices in the NICU in Saudi Arabia.

Design

This study used a descriptive cross-sectional design.

Settings

Research was conducted using an online survey.

Participants/Subjects

This study was carried out on 65 NICU nurses. The participants were recruited from one governmental and one private hospital in Saudi Arabia.

Methods

Data on pain assessment practices were collected, including the frequency of pain assessment, pain assessment scales used for preterm and term neonates, and pain assessment documentation. Data were analyzed using frequencies and percentages.

Results

The majority of the participants (94%) routinely assessed pain and documented pain assessment (97%). One-third of the participants assessed pain regularly every hour (32%). The most used pain assessment scales for term neonates were the neonatal infant pain scale (40%) and the cry, required oxygen, increased vital signs, expression, and sleeplessness scale (23%). The most used pain assessment scales for preterm neonates were the neonatal infant pain scale (31%), the cry, required oxygen, increased vital signs, expression, sleeplessness scale (19%), and the premature infant pain profile (17%).

Conclusions

NICU nurses in Saudi Arabia consistently assessed for and documented pain; however, the tools chosen were sometimes suboptimal. A substantial number of NICU nurses used invalid tools to assess pain in term and preterm neonates. An interventional program is needed to enhance the use of evidence-based practice recommendations regarding neonatal pain assessment by nurses in the Neonatal Intensive Care Units in Saudi Arabia.

沙特新生儿重症监护病房护士对疼痛的评估。
背景:研究显示,新生儿重症监护室(NICU)的新生儿疼痛管理并不理想。目的:评估沙特阿拉伯新生儿重症监护室护士的疼痛评估方法:本研究采用描述性横断面设计:研究采用在线调查的方式进行:本研究以 65 名新生儿重症监护室护士为对象。参与者来自沙特阿拉伯的一家公立医院和一家私立医院:收集了有关疼痛评估方法的数据,包括疼痛评估频率、早产儿和足月新生儿使用的疼痛评估量表以及疼痛评估记录。采用频率和百分比对数据进行分析:结果:大多数参与者(94%)会对疼痛进行常规评估并记录疼痛评估结果(97%)。三分之一的参与者每小时定期进行疼痛评估(32%)。足月新生儿最常用的疼痛评估量表是新生儿疼痛量表(40%)和哭闹、需氧、生命体征增强、表情和失眠量表(23%)。早产新生儿最常用的疼痛评估量表是新生儿疼痛量表(31%)、哭闹、需氧、生命体征增快、表情和失眠量表(19%)以及早产儿疼痛档案(17%):沙特阿拉伯的新生儿重症监护室护士一直在评估和记录疼痛,但所选工具有时不够理想。大量新生儿重症监护室护士使用无效的工具来评估足月和早产新生儿的疼痛。需要制定一项干预计划,以加强沙特阿拉伯新生儿重症监护病房护士对新生儿疼痛评估循证实践建议的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信