Multi-sector stakeholder consensus on tackling the complex health and social needs of the growing population of people leaving prison in older age.

IF 3 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Ye In Jane Hwang, Stephen Hampton, Adrienne Lee Withall, Phillip Snoyman, Katrina Forsyth, Tony Butler
{"title":"Multi-sector stakeholder consensus on tackling the complex health and social needs of the growing population of people leaving prison in older age.","authors":"Ye In Jane Hwang, Stephen Hampton, Adrienne Lee Withall, Phillip Snoyman, Katrina Forsyth, Tony Butler","doi":"10.1186/s40352-024-00271-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As populations age globally, cooperation across multi-sector stakeholders is increasingly important to service older persons, particularly those with high and complex health and social needs. One such population is older people entering society after a period of incarceration in prison. The 'ageing epidemic' in prisons worldwide has caught the attention of researchers, governments and community organisations, who identify challenges in servicing this group as they re-enter the community. Challenges lie across multiple sectors, with inadequate support leading to dire consequences for public health, social welfare and recidivism. This is the first study to bring together multi-sector stakeholders from Australia to form recommendations for improving health and social outcomes for older people re-entering community after imprisonment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A modified nominal group technique was used to produce recommendations from N = 15 key stakeholders across prison health, corrections, research, advocacy, aged care, community services, via online workshops. The importance and priority of these recommendations was validated by a broader sample of N = 44 stakeholders, using an online survey. Thirty-six recommendations for improving outcomes for this population were strongly supported. The key issues underlying the recommendations included: improved multi-stakeholder systems and services, targeted release preparation and practices that ensure continuity of care, advocacy-focused initiatives in the community, and extended funding for effective programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is consensus across stakeholders on ways forward, with intervention and policy updates required at the individual, systems and community levels. These recommendations entail two important findings about this population: (1) They are a high-needs, unique, and underserved group at risk of significant health and social inequity in the community, (2) Multi-sector stakeholder cooperation will be crucial to service this growing group.</p>","PeriodicalId":37843,"journal":{"name":"Health and Justice","volume":"12 1","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11027373/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-024-00271-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As populations age globally, cooperation across multi-sector stakeholders is increasingly important to service older persons, particularly those with high and complex health and social needs. One such population is older people entering society after a period of incarceration in prison. The 'ageing epidemic' in prisons worldwide has caught the attention of researchers, governments and community organisations, who identify challenges in servicing this group as they re-enter the community. Challenges lie across multiple sectors, with inadequate support leading to dire consequences for public health, social welfare and recidivism. This is the first study to bring together multi-sector stakeholders from Australia to form recommendations for improving health and social outcomes for older people re-entering community after imprisonment.

Results: A modified nominal group technique was used to produce recommendations from N = 15 key stakeholders across prison health, corrections, research, advocacy, aged care, community services, via online workshops. The importance and priority of these recommendations was validated by a broader sample of N = 44 stakeholders, using an online survey. Thirty-six recommendations for improving outcomes for this population were strongly supported. The key issues underlying the recommendations included: improved multi-stakeholder systems and services, targeted release preparation and practices that ensure continuity of care, advocacy-focused initiatives in the community, and extended funding for effective programs.

Conclusions: There is consensus across stakeholders on ways forward, with intervention and policy updates required at the individual, systems and community levels. These recommendations entail two important findings about this population: (1) They are a high-needs, unique, and underserved group at risk of significant health and social inequity in the community, (2) Multi-sector stakeholder cooperation will be crucial to service this growing group.

多部门利益相关者就解决日益增多的老年刑满释放人员的复杂健康和社会需求问题达成共识。
背景:随着全球人口的老龄化,多部门利益相关者之间的合作对于服务老年人,特别是那些具有高度和复杂的健康和社会需求的老年人,变得越来越重要。在监狱服刑一段时间后重返社会的老年人就是其中之一。全球监狱中的 "老龄化流行病 "引起了研究人员、政府和社区组织的关注,他们发现了为这一群体重新进入社区提供服务所面临的挑战。挑战横跨多个领域,支持不足会给公共卫生、社会福利和累犯问题带来严重后果。这是第一项汇集澳大利亚多部门利益相关者的研究,旨在为改善刑满释放后重返社区的老年人的健康和社会成果提出建议:结果:采用修改后的名义小组技术,通过在线研讨会,从监狱卫生、惩戒、研究、宣传、老年护理、社区服务等 N = 15 个主要利益相关者中提出建议。这些建议的重要性和优先性通过在线调查得到了 N = 44 个利益相关者的广泛认可。有 36 项关于改善该群体成果的建议得到了大力支持。这些建议所涉及的关键问题包括:改善多方利益相关者的系统和服务、有针对性的释放准备工作和确保护理连续性的做法、在社区开展以宣传为重点的活动,以及为有效的计划提供更多资金:各利益相关方对未来的发展方向达成了共识,需要在个人、系统和社区层面进行干预和政策更新。这些建议包含了关于这一群体的两个重要发现:(1)他们是一个高需求、独特且服务不足的群体,在社区中面临严重的健康和社会不公平风险;(2)多部门利益相关者的合作对于服务这一日益增长的群体至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health and Justice
Health and Justice Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health & Justice is open to submissions from public health, criminology and criminal justice, medical science, psychology and clinical sciences, sociology, neuroscience, biology, anthropology and the social sciences, and covers a broad array of research types. It publishes original research, research notes (promising issues that are smaller in scope), commentaries, and translational notes (possible ways of introducing innovations in the justice system). Health & Justice aims to: Present original experimental research on the area of health and well-being of people involved in the adult or juvenile justice system, including people who work in the system; Present meta-analysis or systematic reviews in the area of health and justice for those involved in the justice system; Provide an arena to present new and upcoming scientific issues; Present translational science—the movement of scientific findings into practice including programs, procedures, or strategies; Present implementation science findings to advance the uptake and use of evidence-based practices; and, Present protocols and clinical practice guidelines. As an open access journal, Health & Justice aims for a broad reach, including researchers across many disciplines as well as justice practitioners (e.g. judges, prosecutors, defenders, probation officers, treatment providers, mental health and medical personnel working with justice-involved individuals, etc.). The sections of the journal devoted to translational and implementation sciences are primarily geared to practitioners and justice actors with special attention to the techniques used.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信