Strategies for Accessible Breast Screening for People With Intellectual Disability.

IF 3 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Janelle Weise, Rachael Cvejic, Julian Trollor
{"title":"Strategies for Accessible Breast Screening for People With Intellectual Disability.","authors":"Janelle Weise, Rachael Cvejic, Julian Trollor","doi":"10.1177/21501319241251938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>People with intellectual disability are less likely to participate in breast screening than people without intellectual disability. They experience a range of barriers to accessing breast screening, however, there is no consensus on strategies to overcome these barriers. Our objective was to reach consensus on the strategies required for accessible breast screening for people with intellectual disability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fourteen experts participated in a modified on-line Delphi that used Levesque's model of health care access as the theoretical framework. At the end of each round descriptive and thematic analyses were completed. Data was then triangulated to determine if consensus was reached.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 3 rounds, 9 strategies were modified, 24 strategies were added and consensus was reached for 52 strategies across the 5 dimensions of access. Key areas of action related to (i) decision making and consent, (ii) accessible information, (iii) engagement of peer mentors, (iv) service navigators, and (v) equipping key stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The resulting strategies are the first to articulate how to make breast screening accessible and can be used to inform health policy and quality improvement practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":46723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11075611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319241251938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: People with intellectual disability are less likely to participate in breast screening than people without intellectual disability. They experience a range of barriers to accessing breast screening, however, there is no consensus on strategies to overcome these barriers. Our objective was to reach consensus on the strategies required for accessible breast screening for people with intellectual disability.

Methods: Fourteen experts participated in a modified on-line Delphi that used Levesque's model of health care access as the theoretical framework. At the end of each round descriptive and thematic analyses were completed. Data was then triangulated to determine if consensus was reached.

Results: After 3 rounds, 9 strategies were modified, 24 strategies were added and consensus was reached for 52 strategies across the 5 dimensions of access. Key areas of action related to (i) decision making and consent, (ii) accessible information, (iii) engagement of peer mentors, (iv) service navigators, and (v) equipping key stakeholders.

Conclusions: The resulting strategies are the first to articulate how to make breast screening accessible and can be used to inform health policy and quality improvement practices.

为智障人士提供无障碍乳房筛查的策略。
导言:与非智障人士相比,智障人士参加乳房筛查的可能性较低。他们在接受乳腺筛查时会遇到一系列障碍,然而,对于克服这些障碍的策略还没有达成共识。我们的目标是就为智障人士提供无障碍乳腺筛查所需的策略达成共识:方法:14 位专家参与了改良的在线德尔菲法,该方法以 Levesque 的医疗保健获取模型为理论框架。每轮分析结束后,都会进行描述性分析和主题分析。然后对数据进行三角测量,以确定是否达成共识:结果:经过三轮讨论,9 项战略得到修改,24 项战略得到补充,52 项战略在获取医疗服务的 5 个方面达成了共识。主要行动领域涉及:(i) 决策和同意;(ii) 可获取的信息;(iii) 同行导师的参与;(iv) 服务导航员;(v) 为主要利益相关者提供装备:由此产生的战略首次阐明了如何使乳腺筛查成为无障碍筛查,可用于为卫生政策和质量改进实践提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
183
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信