Clinical Efficacy of Adhesion Release Under Brachial Plexus Block Plus Silver Needle Warm Acupuncture on Frozen Shoulder and Recovery of Limb Function.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Haiyang Wang, Daohua Fan, Qiang Lan, Huaqu Gong
{"title":"Clinical Efficacy of Adhesion Release Under Brachial Plexus Block Plus Silver Needle Warm Acupuncture on Frozen Shoulder and Recovery of Limb Function.","authors":"Haiyang Wang, Daohua Fan, Qiang Lan, Huaqu Gong","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of combining adhesion release under brachial plexus block with silver needle warm acupuncture for the treatment of frozen shoulder, compared to adhesion release under brachial plexus block alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 72 patients with frozen shoulder were randomly assigned to receive either adhesion release under brachial plexus block (control group) or adhesion release under brachial plexus block plus silver needle warm acupuncture (treatment group). Outcome measures included changes in shoulder pain scores assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), shoulder mobility scores evaluated using the Constant-Murley Score, shoulder function scores measured using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, and overall clinical outcomes based on a comprehensive evaluation. Both groups received functional exercise 2 days after the operation, and the treatment duration was 3 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The treatment group exhibited a mean reduction in shoulder pain scores of 3.2 points on the Short-form McGill pain scores, while the control group showed a reduction of 1.5 points. Shoulder mobility scores, assessed by the Constant-Murley Score, increased by an average of 18.6 points in the treatment group, compared to 9.2 points in the control group. Moreover, the treatment group achieved better shoulder function scores on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, with an average improvement of 25.4 points, compared to 13.8 points in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides valuable insights into the clinical efficacy of adhesion release under brachial plexus block plus silver needle warm acupuncture for frozen shoulder, there are still areas that warrant further investigation. Future research could focus on the long-term effects of the treatment, optimal treatment duration and frequency, comparison with other treatment modalities, and the inclusion of larger sample sizes to enhance the robustness of the findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7571,"journal":{"name":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","volume":" ","pages":"251-257"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of combining adhesion release under brachial plexus block with silver needle warm acupuncture for the treatment of frozen shoulder, compared to adhesion release under brachial plexus block alone.

Methods: A total of 72 patients with frozen shoulder were randomly assigned to receive either adhesion release under brachial plexus block (control group) or adhesion release under brachial plexus block plus silver needle warm acupuncture (treatment group). Outcome measures included changes in shoulder pain scores assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), shoulder mobility scores evaluated using the Constant-Murley Score, shoulder function scores measured using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, and overall clinical outcomes based on a comprehensive evaluation. Both groups received functional exercise 2 days after the operation, and the treatment duration was 3 weeks.

Results: The treatment group exhibited a mean reduction in shoulder pain scores of 3.2 points on the Short-form McGill pain scores, while the control group showed a reduction of 1.5 points. Shoulder mobility scores, assessed by the Constant-Murley Score, increased by an average of 18.6 points in the treatment group, compared to 9.2 points in the control group. Moreover, the treatment group achieved better shoulder function scores on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, with an average improvement of 25.4 points, compared to 13.8 points in the control group.

Conclusion: This study provides valuable insights into the clinical efficacy of adhesion release under brachial plexus block plus silver needle warm acupuncture for frozen shoulder, there are still areas that warrant further investigation. Future research could focus on the long-term effects of the treatment, optimal treatment duration and frequency, comparison with other treatment modalities, and the inclusion of larger sample sizes to enhance the robustness of the findings.

臂丛神经阻滞下粘连松解加银针温灸对肩周炎及肢体功能恢复的临床疗效
研究目的本研究旨在评估臂丛神经阻滞下粘连松解术联合银针温针灸治疗肩周炎与单纯臂丛神经阻滞下粘连松解术相比的临床疗效和安全性:共有72名肩周炎患者被随机分配到接受臂丛神经阻滞下粘连松解术(对照组)或臂丛神经阻滞下粘连松解术加银针温针灸(治疗组)。结果测量包括使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估的肩部疼痛评分变化、使用康斯坦茨-默里评分法评估的肩部活动度评分、使用手臂、肩部和手部残疾(DASH)问卷测量的肩部功能评分,以及基于综合评估的总体临床结果。两组患者均在术后两天接受功能锻炼,疗程均为3周:结果:治疗组的短式麦吉尔疼痛评分平均降低了 3.2 分,而对照组降低了 1.5 分。根据康斯坦茨-默里评分法评估,治疗组的肩关节活动度平均提高了 18.6 分,而对照组仅提高了 9.2 分。此外,治疗组在 "手臂、肩部和手部残疾(DASH)"问卷中获得了更好的肩部功能评分,平均提高了 25.4 分,而对照组仅提高了 13.8 分:本研究为臂丛神经阻滞加银针温针灸治疗肩周炎的粘连松解临床疗效提供了有价值的见解,但仍有值得进一步研究的地方。今后的研究可重点关注治疗的长期效果、最佳治疗时间和频率、与其他治疗方式的比较,以及纳入更大的样本量以增强研究结果的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alternative therapies in health and medicine
Alternative therapies in health and medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
219
期刊介绍: Launched in 1995, Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine has a mission to promote the art and science of integrative medicine and a responsibility to improve public health. We strive to maintain the highest standards of ethical medical journalism independent of special interests that is timely, accurate, and a pleasure to read. We publish original, peer-reviewed scientific articles that provide health care providers with continuing education to promote health, prevent illness, and treat disease. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine was the first journal in this field to be indexed in the National Library of Medicine. In 2006, 2007, and 2008, ATHM had the highest impact factor ranking of any independently published peer-reviewed CAM journal in the United States—meaning that its research articles were cited more frequently than any other journal’s in the field. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine does not endorse any particular system or method but promotes the evaluation and appropriate use of all effective therapeutic approaches. Each issue contains a variety of disciplined inquiry methods, from case reports to original scientific research to systematic reviews. The editors encourage the integration of evidence-based emerging therapies with conventional medical practices by licensed health care providers in a way that promotes a comprehensive approach to health care that is focused on wellness, prevention, and healing. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine hopes to inform all licensed health care practitioners about developments in fields other than their own and to foster an ongoing debate about the scientific, clinical, historical, legal, political, and cultural issues that affect all of health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信