Clinical Efficacy of Adhesion Release Under Brachial Plexus Block Plus Silver Needle Warm Acupuncture on Frozen Shoulder and Recovery of Limb Function.
IF 1.9 4区 医学Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
{"title":"Clinical Efficacy of Adhesion Release Under Brachial Plexus Block Plus Silver Needle Warm Acupuncture on Frozen Shoulder and Recovery of Limb Function.","authors":"Haiyang Wang, Daohua Fan, Qiang Lan, Huaqu Gong","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of combining adhesion release under brachial plexus block with silver needle warm acupuncture for the treatment of frozen shoulder, compared to adhesion release under brachial plexus block alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 72 patients with frozen shoulder were randomly assigned to receive either adhesion release under brachial plexus block (control group) or adhesion release under brachial plexus block plus silver needle warm acupuncture (treatment group). Outcome measures included changes in shoulder pain scores assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), shoulder mobility scores evaluated using the Constant-Murley Score, shoulder function scores measured using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, and overall clinical outcomes based on a comprehensive evaluation. Both groups received functional exercise 2 days after the operation, and the treatment duration was 3 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The treatment group exhibited a mean reduction in shoulder pain scores of 3.2 points on the Short-form McGill pain scores, while the control group showed a reduction of 1.5 points. Shoulder mobility scores, assessed by the Constant-Murley Score, increased by an average of 18.6 points in the treatment group, compared to 9.2 points in the control group. Moreover, the treatment group achieved better shoulder function scores on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, with an average improvement of 25.4 points, compared to 13.8 points in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides valuable insights into the clinical efficacy of adhesion release under brachial plexus block plus silver needle warm acupuncture for frozen shoulder, there are still areas that warrant further investigation. Future research could focus on the long-term effects of the treatment, optimal treatment duration and frequency, comparison with other treatment modalities, and the inclusion of larger sample sizes to enhance the robustness of the findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7571,"journal":{"name":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","volume":" ","pages":"251-257"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of combining adhesion release under brachial plexus block with silver needle warm acupuncture for the treatment of frozen shoulder, compared to adhesion release under brachial plexus block alone.
Methods: A total of 72 patients with frozen shoulder were randomly assigned to receive either adhesion release under brachial plexus block (control group) or adhesion release under brachial plexus block plus silver needle warm acupuncture (treatment group). Outcome measures included changes in shoulder pain scores assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), shoulder mobility scores evaluated using the Constant-Murley Score, shoulder function scores measured using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, and overall clinical outcomes based on a comprehensive evaluation. Both groups received functional exercise 2 days after the operation, and the treatment duration was 3 weeks.
Results: The treatment group exhibited a mean reduction in shoulder pain scores of 3.2 points on the Short-form McGill pain scores, while the control group showed a reduction of 1.5 points. Shoulder mobility scores, assessed by the Constant-Murley Score, increased by an average of 18.6 points in the treatment group, compared to 9.2 points in the control group. Moreover, the treatment group achieved better shoulder function scores on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, with an average improvement of 25.4 points, compared to 13.8 points in the control group.
Conclusion: This study provides valuable insights into the clinical efficacy of adhesion release under brachial plexus block plus silver needle warm acupuncture for frozen shoulder, there are still areas that warrant further investigation. Future research could focus on the long-term effects of the treatment, optimal treatment duration and frequency, comparison with other treatment modalities, and the inclusion of larger sample sizes to enhance the robustness of the findings.
期刊介绍:
Launched in 1995, Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine has a mission to promote the art and science of integrative medicine and a responsibility to improve public health. We strive to maintain the highest standards of ethical medical journalism independent of special interests that is timely, accurate, and a pleasure to read. We publish original, peer-reviewed scientific articles that provide health care providers with continuing education to promote health, prevent illness, and treat disease. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine was the first journal in this field to be indexed in the National Library of Medicine. In 2006, 2007, and 2008, ATHM had the highest impact factor ranking of any independently published peer-reviewed CAM journal in the United States—meaning that its research articles were cited more frequently than any other journal’s in the field.
Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine does not endorse any particular system or method but promotes the evaluation and appropriate use of all effective therapeutic approaches. Each issue contains a variety of disciplined inquiry methods, from case reports to original scientific research to systematic reviews. The editors encourage the integration of evidence-based emerging therapies with conventional medical practices by licensed health care providers in a way that promotes a comprehensive approach to health care that is focused on wellness, prevention, and healing. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine hopes to inform all licensed health care practitioners about developments in fields other than their own and to foster an ongoing debate about the scientific, clinical, historical, legal, political, and cultural issues that affect all of health care.