Antibiotic Resistance and Disinfectant Resistance Among Escherichia coli Isolated During Red Meat Production

IF 2.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Manita Guragain , John W. Schmidt , Lori K. Bagi , George C. Paoli , Norasak Kalchayanand , Joseph M. Bosilevac
{"title":"Antibiotic Resistance and Disinfectant Resistance Among Escherichia coli Isolated During Red Meat Production","authors":"Manita Guragain ,&nbsp;John W. Schmidt ,&nbsp;Lori K. Bagi ,&nbsp;George C. Paoli ,&nbsp;Norasak Kalchayanand ,&nbsp;Joseph M. Bosilevac","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Escherichia coli</em> commonly found in the gastrointestinal tracts of food animals include Shiga toxin-producing <em>E. coli</em> (STEC, <em>stx<sup>+</sup>, eae<sup>-</sup></em>), Enterohemorrhagic <em>E. coli</em> (EHEC, <em>stx<sup>+</sup>, eae<sup>+</sup></em>), Enteropathogenic <em>E. coli</em> (EPEC, <em>stx<sup>-</sup>, eae<sup>+</sup></em>), and “nondiarrheagenic” <em>E. coli</em> (NDEC, <em>stx<sup>-</sup>, eae<sup>-</sup></em>). EHEC, EPEC, and STEC are associated with foodborne disease outbreaks. During meat processing, disinfectants are employed to control various bacteria, including human pathogens. Concerns exist that <em>E. coli</em> resistant to antibiotics are less susceptible to disinfectants used during meat processing. Since EHEC, EPEC, and STEC with reduced susceptibility to disinfectants are potential public health risks, the goal of this study was to evaluate the association of antibiotic resistant (ABR) <em>E. coli</em> with increased tolerance to 4% lactic acid (LA) and 150 ppm quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs). A pool of 3,367 <em>E. coli</em> isolated from beef cattle, veal calves, swine, and sheep at various processing stages was screened to identify ABR <em>E. coli</em>. Resistance to ≥1 of the six antibiotics examined was identified in 27.9%, 36.1%, 54.5%, and 28.7% among the NDEC (<em>n</em> = 579), EHEC (<em>n</em> = 693), EPEC (<em>n</em> = 787), and STEC (<em>n</em> = 1308) isolates evaluated, respectively. Disinfectant tolerance did not differ (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05) between ABR and antibiotic susceptible EHEC isolates. Comparable frequencies (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05) of biofilm formation or congo red binding were observed between ABR and antibiotic susceptible strains of <em>E. coli</em>. Understanding the frequencies of ABR and disinfectant tolerance among <em>E. coli</em> present in food-animal is a critically important component of meat safety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24000723/pdfft?md5=65f21667b2aef0a4b854e33136a67d1e&pid=1-s2.0-S0362028X24000723-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24000723","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Escherichia coli commonly found in the gastrointestinal tracts of food animals include Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC, stx+, eae-), Enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC, stx+, eae+), Enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC, stx-, eae+), and “nondiarrheagenic” E. coli (NDEC, stx-, eae-). EHEC, EPEC, and STEC are associated with foodborne disease outbreaks. During meat processing, disinfectants are employed to control various bacteria, including human pathogens. Concerns exist that E. coli resistant to antibiotics are less susceptible to disinfectants used during meat processing. Since EHEC, EPEC, and STEC with reduced susceptibility to disinfectants are potential public health risks, the goal of this study was to evaluate the association of antibiotic resistant (ABR) E. coli with increased tolerance to 4% lactic acid (LA) and 150 ppm quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs). A pool of 3,367 E. coli isolated from beef cattle, veal calves, swine, and sheep at various processing stages was screened to identify ABR E. coli. Resistance to ≥1 of the six antibiotics examined was identified in 27.9%, 36.1%, 54.5%, and 28.7% among the NDEC (n = 579), EHEC (n = 693), EPEC (n = 787), and STEC (n = 1308) isolates evaluated, respectively. Disinfectant tolerance did not differ (P > 0.05) between ABR and antibiotic susceptible EHEC isolates. Comparable frequencies (P > 0.05) of biofilm formation or congo red binding were observed between ABR and antibiotic susceptible strains of E. coli. Understanding the frequencies of ABR and disinfectant tolerance among E. coli present in food-animal is a critically important component of meat safety.

红肉生产过程中分离出的大肠埃希菌的抗生素耐药性和消毒剂耐药性。
食用动物胃肠道中常见的大肠杆菌包括产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC,stx+ 和 eae-)、肠出血性大肠杆菌(EHEC,stx+ 和 eae+)、肠致病性大肠杆菌(EPEC,stx- 和 eae+)以及 "非腹泻性 "大肠杆菌(NDEC,stx- 和 eae-)。EHEC、EPEC 和 STEC 与食源性疾病的爆发有关。肉类加工过程中使用消毒剂来控制各种细菌,包括人类病原体。有人担心,对抗生素有抗药性的大肠杆菌对肉类加工过程中使用的消毒剂的敏感性较低。由于对消毒剂敏感性降低的 EHEC、EPEC 和 STEC 具有潜在的公共卫生风险,本研究旨在评估耐抗生素(ABR)大肠杆菌与对 4% 乳酸(LA)和 150 ppm 季铵化合物(QACs)耐受性增加的关联。对从不同加工阶段的肉牛、小牛、猪和羊身上分离出的 3,367 个大肠杆菌进行了筛选,以确定 ABR 大肠杆菌。在所评估的 NDEC(n = 579)、EHEC(n = 693)、EPEC(n = 787)和 STEC(n = 1308)分离物中,分别有 27.9%、36.1%、54.5% 和 28.7%的大肠杆菌对所检测的六种抗生素中的≥一种产生耐药性。ABR 和对抗生素敏感的 EHEC 分离物对消毒剂的耐受性没有差异(P>0.05)。在 ABR 和对抗生素敏感的大肠杆菌菌株之间观察到生物膜形成或刚果红结合的频率相当(P>0.05)。了解食用动物中大肠杆菌的 ABR 频率和对消毒剂的耐受性对肉类安全至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信