ePortfolios: Enhancing confidence in student radiographers' communication of radiographic anatomy and pathology. A cross-sectional study

IF 1.8 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Magdalena Dolic BRadMedImag (Hons), Yaxuan Peng BRadMedImag (Hons), Keshav Dhingra BRadMedImag (Hons), Kristal Lee BRadMedImag (Hons), John McInerney HDipHPE. GCHPE, PGCertIV Leadership and Management, PGCert CT Imaging, PGDip IV cannulation, BSc(Rad) Hons
{"title":"ePortfolios: Enhancing confidence in student radiographers' communication of radiographic anatomy and pathology. A cross-sectional study","authors":"Magdalena Dolic BRadMedImag (Hons),&nbsp;Yaxuan Peng BRadMedImag (Hons),&nbsp;Keshav Dhingra BRadMedImag (Hons),&nbsp;Kristal Lee BRadMedImag (Hons),&nbsp;John McInerney HDipHPE. GCHPE, PGCertIV Leadership and Management, PGCert CT Imaging, PGDip IV cannulation, BSc(Rad) Hons","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>In 2020, the Medical Radiation Practice Board of Australia made several revisions to its professional capabilities. To address this, medical radiation practitioners, including diagnostic radiographers, are required to escalate urgent findings in all radiographic settings. However, the confidence of radiographers in articulating descriptions of radiographic findings varies despite this requirement. This cross-sectional study explores how the implementation of eportfolio affects student self-perceived confidence in identifying and describing radiographic findings in both an academic and a clinical setting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A Qualtrics survey was distributed to second-year radiography students who had used eportfolios. The survey comprised of four questions using a Likert-scale and one open-ended question. Quantitative data were analysed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and qualitative data was thematically assessed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, 55 of 65 radiographic students (85%) completed the survey. Confidence (strongly agree and agree) decreased from 89% to 74% between academic and clinical environments when identifying abnormalities, and 89% to 73% when describing findings. This finding highlights the challenges students face when in the clinical environment. Wilcoxon signed rank test analysed a statistically significant relation between the two environments (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). However, the relationship between identifying and describing skills was not statistically significant (<i>P</i> &gt; 0.05). Following a review of the qualitative data, three recurring themes were identified among responses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>ePortfolios assist in improving confidence in identification and description of radiographic abnormalities, particularly in an academic setting. The clinical environment presents unique challenges which may limit student clinical performance; however, this requires further investigation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":"71 3","pages":"403-411"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jmrs.787","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmrs.787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

In 2020, the Medical Radiation Practice Board of Australia made several revisions to its professional capabilities. To address this, medical radiation practitioners, including diagnostic radiographers, are required to escalate urgent findings in all radiographic settings. However, the confidence of radiographers in articulating descriptions of radiographic findings varies despite this requirement. This cross-sectional study explores how the implementation of eportfolio affects student self-perceived confidence in identifying and describing radiographic findings in both an academic and a clinical setting.

Methods

A Qualtrics survey was distributed to second-year radiography students who had used eportfolios. The survey comprised of four questions using a Likert-scale and one open-ended question. Quantitative data were analysed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and qualitative data was thematically assessed.

Results

Overall, 55 of 65 radiographic students (85%) completed the survey. Confidence (strongly agree and agree) decreased from 89% to 74% between academic and clinical environments when identifying abnormalities, and 89% to 73% when describing findings. This finding highlights the challenges students face when in the clinical environment. Wilcoxon signed rank test analysed a statistically significant relation between the two environments (P < 0.05). However, the relationship between identifying and describing skills was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Following a review of the qualitative data, three recurring themes were identified among responses.

Conclusion

ePortfolios assist in improving confidence in identification and description of radiographic abnormalities, particularly in an academic setting. The clinical environment presents unique challenges which may limit student clinical performance; however, this requires further investigation.

Abstract Image

电子作品集:增强放射技师学生对放射解剖学和病理学交流的信心。一项横断面研究。
导言:2020 年,澳大利亚医疗放射执业委员会对其专业能力进行了多项修订。为此,包括放射诊断技师在内的医疗放射从业人员必须上报所有放射环境中的紧急发现。然而,尽管有这一要求,放射技师在描述放射检查结果时的信心却各不相同。本横断面研究探讨了电子档案的实施如何影响学生在学术和临床环境中识别和描述放射检查结果的自我认知信心:向使用过电子作品集的二年级放射学学生发放了一份Qualtrics调查问卷。调查包括四个李克特量表问题和一个开放式问题。定量数据采用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验进行分析,定性数据采用主题评估:总体而言,65 名放射专业学生中有 55 人(85%)完成了调查。在学术和临床环境中,识别异常时的信心(非常同意和同意)从89%降至74%,描述发现时的信心从89%降至73%。这一发现凸显了学生在临床环境中面临的挑战。Wilcoxon 符号秩检验分析了两种环境之间的统计学关系(P 0.05)。结论:电子作品集有助于提高学生识别和描述放射学异常的信心,尤其是在学术环境中。临床环境带来了独特的挑战,可能会限制学生的临床表现;不过,这还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
69
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences (JMRS) is an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal that accepts manuscripts related to medical imaging / diagnostic radiography, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, medical ultrasound / sonography, and the complementary disciplines of medical physics, radiology, radiation oncology, nursing, psychology and sociology. Manuscripts may take the form of: original articles, review articles, commentary articles, technical evaluations, case series and case studies. JMRS promotes excellence in international medical radiation science by the publication of contemporary and advanced research that encourages the adoption of the best clinical, scientific and educational practices in international communities. JMRS is the official professional journal of the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) and the New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology (NZIMRT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信