"Feed-and-wrap" technique versus deep sedation for neonatal magnetic resonance imaging: a retrospective comparative study.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
European Radiology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1007/s00330-024-10777-6
André Lollert, Kim Sophie Frey, Christian Hoffmann, Markus Herbst, Jochem König, Isabella Schmeh, Frank Dette, Gundula Staatz
{"title":"\"Feed-and-wrap\" technique versus deep sedation for neonatal magnetic resonance imaging: a retrospective comparative study.","authors":"André Lollert, Kim Sophie Frey, Christian Hoffmann, Markus Herbst, Jochem König, Isabella Schmeh, Frank Dette, Gundula Staatz","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-10777-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Neonatal MRI is usually performed under deep sedation, which is challenging-especially in low-weight premature patients. In addition, long-term side effects, such as neurotoxicity, are of concern. An alternative to sedation is to induce natural sleep by feeding and immobilising the child, the \"feed-and-wrap\" technique (FWT). The objective of this study was to evaluate differences in image quality between neonates examined under sedation and by using the FWT during the first four months of life.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively assessed image quality (based on a 4-point semiquantitative scale) of all MRI examinations in neonates performed at our institution between July 2009 and August 2022. Differences in image quality between examinations under sedation versus FWT were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 432 consecutive patients, 243 (56%) using sedation and 189 (44%) using the FWT. Corrected age and body weight (mean ± SD: 3.7 ± 1.1 versus 4.5 ± 1.3 kg, p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the FWT group. The overall success rate in the FWT group was 95%. Image quality was slightly lower when using the FWT (mean ± SD: 3.7 ± 0.43 versus 3.96 ± 0.11, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed a higher risk of acquiring sequences with diagnostic limitations in the FWT group (p < 0.001), increasing with corrected age (p = 0.048).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FWT is a highly successful method to perform MRI scans in term and preterm neonates. Overall image quality is only slightly lower than under sedation. Especially in immature low-weight preterm patients, the FWT is a reliable option to perform MRI studies without exposing the child to risks associated with sedation.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>The \"feed-and-wrap\" technique enables high-quality MRI examinations in neonates, including low-weight premature patients. Deep sedation for diagnostic MRI procedures in this age group, which has the risk of short- and long-term complications, can often be avoided.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Deeply sedating neonates for MR examinations comes with risks. Image quality is only slightly lower when using the \"feed-and-wrap\" technique. The \"feed-and-wrap\" technique is feasible even in low-weight premature infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10777-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Neonatal MRI is usually performed under deep sedation, which is challenging-especially in low-weight premature patients. In addition, long-term side effects, such as neurotoxicity, are of concern. An alternative to sedation is to induce natural sleep by feeding and immobilising the child, the "feed-and-wrap" technique (FWT). The objective of this study was to evaluate differences in image quality between neonates examined under sedation and by using the FWT during the first four months of life.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively assessed image quality (based on a 4-point semiquantitative scale) of all MRI examinations in neonates performed at our institution between July 2009 and August 2022. Differences in image quality between examinations under sedation versus FWT were evaluated.

Results: We included 432 consecutive patients, 243 (56%) using sedation and 189 (44%) using the FWT. Corrected age and body weight (mean ± SD: 3.7 ± 1.1 versus 4.5 ± 1.3 kg, p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the FWT group. The overall success rate in the FWT group was 95%. Image quality was slightly lower when using the FWT (mean ± SD: 3.7 ± 0.43 versus 3.96 ± 0.11, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed a higher risk of acquiring sequences with diagnostic limitations in the FWT group (p < 0.001), increasing with corrected age (p = 0.048).

Conclusion: The FWT is a highly successful method to perform MRI scans in term and preterm neonates. Overall image quality is only slightly lower than under sedation. Especially in immature low-weight preterm patients, the FWT is a reliable option to perform MRI studies without exposing the child to risks associated with sedation.

Clinical relevance statement: The "feed-and-wrap" technique enables high-quality MRI examinations in neonates, including low-weight premature patients. Deep sedation for diagnostic MRI procedures in this age group, which has the risk of short- and long-term complications, can often be avoided.

Key points: Deeply sedating neonates for MR examinations comes with risks. Image quality is only slightly lower when using the "feed-and-wrap" technique. The "feed-and-wrap" technique is feasible even in low-weight premature infants.

Abstract Image

新生儿磁共振成像中的 "喂食-包裹 "技术与深度镇静法:一项回顾性比较研究。
目的:新生儿核磁共振成像通常是在深度镇静的情况下进行的,这具有挑战性,尤其是对体重较轻的早产儿而言。此外,神经毒性等长期副作用也令人担忧。镇静剂的另一种替代方法是通过喂食和固定患儿来诱导患儿自然入睡,即 "喂食-包扎 "技术(FWT)。本研究的目的是评估新生儿出生后头四个月在镇静状态下和使用 "喂养包扎 "技术进行检查时图像质量的差异:我们对 2009 年 7 月至 2022 年 8 月期间在我院进行的所有新生儿 MRI 检查的图像质量(基于 4 点半定量表)进行了回顾性评估。结果:我们连续收治了 432 名患者,其中 243 人(56%)使用镇静剂,189 人(44%)使用 FWT。校正后的年龄和体重(平均 ± SD:3.7 ± 1.1 对 4.5 ± 1.3 千克,P 结论:FWT 是一种非常成功的检查方法:FWT 是对足月和早产新生儿进行磁共振成像扫描的一种非常成功的方法。总体图像质量仅略低于镇静状态下的图像质量。特别是对于未成熟的低体重早产儿,FWT 是进行核磁共振成像研究的可靠选择,而不会使患儿面临镇静剂带来的风险:喂食-包扎 "技术可为新生儿(包括低体重早产儿)提供高质量的磁共振成像检查。在这一年龄段的新生儿中进行核磁共振成像诊断程序时,通常可以避免深度镇静,因为深度镇静有可能导致短期和长期并发症:要点:对新生儿进行磁共振成像检查时使用深度镇静剂存在风险。使用 "喂食-包裹 "技术时,图像质量只会略微降低。即使是低体重早产儿,"喂食-包扎 "技术也是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信