Impact of time to treatment in first occurrence, non-severe Clostridioides difficile infection for elderly patients: are we waiting too long to treat?

Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE Pub Date : 2024-04-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1017/ash.2024.46
Rhett Vandervelde, Mark E Mlynarek, Mayur Ramesh, Nimish Patel, Michael P Veve, Benjamin A August
{"title":"Impact of time to treatment in first occurrence, non-severe <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection for elderly patients: are we waiting too long to treat?","authors":"Rhett Vandervelde, Mark E Mlynarek, Mayur Ramesh, Nimish Patel, Michael P Veve, Benjamin A August","doi":"10.1017/ash.2024.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Data evaluating timeliness of antibiotic therapy in <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infections (CDI) are not well established. The study's purpose was to evaluate the impact of time-to-CDI treatment on disease progression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A case-control study was performed among hospitalized patients with CDI from 1/2018 to 2/2022. Inclusion criteria were age ≥65 years, first occurrence, non-severe CDI at symptom onset, and CDI treatment for ≥72 hours. Cases included patients who progressed to severe or fulminant CDI; controls were patients without CDI progression. Time to CDI treatment was evaluated in three ways: a classification and regression tree (CART)-defined threshold, time as a continuous variable, and time as a categorical variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>272 patients were included; 136 with CDI progression, 136 patients without. The median (IQR) age was 74 (69-81) years, 167 (61%) were women, and 108 (40%) were immunosuppressed. CDI progression patients more commonly were toxin positive (66 [49%] vs 52 [38%], <i>P</i> = .087) with hospital-acquired disease (57 [42%] vs 29 [21%], <i>P</i> < 0.001). A CART-derived breakpoint for optimal time-to-CDI treatment of 64 hours established early (184, 68%) and delayed treatment (88, 32%). When accounting for confounding variables, delayed CDI treatment was associated with disease progression (adjOR, 4.6; 95%CI, 2.6-8.2); this was observed regardless of how time-to-CDI-active therapy was evaluated (continuous adjOR, 1.02; categorical adjOR, 2.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Delayed CDI treatment was associated with disease progression and could represent an important antimicrobial stewardship measure with future evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11062792/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2024.46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Data evaluating timeliness of antibiotic therapy in Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI) are not well established. The study's purpose was to evaluate the impact of time-to-CDI treatment on disease progression.

Methods: A case-control study was performed among hospitalized patients with CDI from 1/2018 to 2/2022. Inclusion criteria were age ≥65 years, first occurrence, non-severe CDI at symptom onset, and CDI treatment for ≥72 hours. Cases included patients who progressed to severe or fulminant CDI; controls were patients without CDI progression. Time to CDI treatment was evaluated in three ways: a classification and regression tree (CART)-defined threshold, time as a continuous variable, and time as a categorical variable.

Results: 272 patients were included; 136 with CDI progression, 136 patients without. The median (IQR) age was 74 (69-81) years, 167 (61%) were women, and 108 (40%) were immunosuppressed. CDI progression patients more commonly were toxin positive (66 [49%] vs 52 [38%], P = .087) with hospital-acquired disease (57 [42%] vs 29 [21%], P < 0.001). A CART-derived breakpoint for optimal time-to-CDI treatment of 64 hours established early (184, 68%) and delayed treatment (88, 32%). When accounting for confounding variables, delayed CDI treatment was associated with disease progression (adjOR, 4.6; 95%CI, 2.6-8.2); this was observed regardless of how time-to-CDI-active therapy was evaluated (continuous adjOR, 1.02; categorical adjOR, 2.11).

Conclusion: Delayed CDI treatment was associated with disease progression and could represent an important antimicrobial stewardship measure with future evaluation.

治疗时间对老年患者首次发生非严重艰难梭菌感染的影响:我们是否等待治疗的时间太长了?
目的:有关艰难梭菌感染(CDI)抗生素治疗及时性的评估数据尚不完善。本研究旨在评估 CDI 治疗时间对疾病进展的影响:在2018年1月1日至2022年2月2日住院的CDI患者中开展了一项病例对照研究。纳入标准为年龄≥65岁、首次发病、症状出现时为非重症CDI、CDI治疗时间≥72小时。病例包括进展为重症或暴发性 CDI 的患者;对照组为无 CDI 进展的患者。对CDI治疗时间的评估有三种方法:分类和回归树(CART)定义的阈值、作为连续变量的时间和作为分类变量的时间。中位(IQR)年龄为 74(69-81)岁,167(61%)人为女性,108(40%)人为免疫抑制患者。CDI 进展期患者多为毒素阳性(66 [49%] vs 52 [38%],P = .087)和医院获得性疾病(57 [42%] vs 29 [21%],P < 0.001)。根据 CART 得出的最佳 CDI 治疗时间断点为 64 小时,确定了早期治疗(184 例,68%)和延迟治疗(88 例,32%)。当考虑到混杂变量时,CDI治疗延迟与疾病进展相关(adjOR,4.6;95%CI,2.6-8.2);无论如何评估CDI有效治疗时间,都能观察到这一点(连续adjOR,1.02;分类adjOR,2.11):CDI治疗延迟与疾病进展有关,可作为一项重要的抗菌药物管理措施进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信