Intergenerational transmission of brain structure and function in humans: a narrative review of designs, methods, and findings.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Brain Structure & Function Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1007/s00429-024-02804-5
Charlotte Constant-Varlet, Tomoya Nakai, Jérôme Prado
{"title":"Intergenerational transmission of brain structure and function in humans: a narrative review of designs, methods, and findings.","authors":"Charlotte Constant-Varlet, Tomoya Nakai, Jérôme Prado","doi":"10.1007/s00429-024-02804-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children often show cognitive and affective traits that are similar to their parents. Although this indicates a transmission of phenotypes from parents to children, little is known about the neural underpinnings of that transmission. Here, we provide a general overview of neuroimaging studies that explore the similarity between parents and children in terms of brain structure and function. We notably discuss the aims, designs, and methods of these so-called intergenerational neuroimaging studies, focusing on two main designs: the parent-child design and the multigenerational design. For each design, we also summarize the major findings, identify the sources of variability between studies, and highlight some limitations and future directions. We argue that the lack of consensus in defining the parent-child transmission of brain structure and function leads to measurement heterogeneity, which is a challenge for future studies. Additionally, multigenerational studies often use measures of family resemblance to estimate the proportion of variance attributed to genetic versus environmental factors, though this estimate is likely inflated given the frequent lack of control for shared environment. Nonetheless, intergenerational neuroimaging studies may still have both clinical and theoretical relevance, not because they currently inform about the etiology of neuromarkers, but rather because they may help identify neuromarkers and test hypotheses about neuromarkers coming from more standard neuroimaging designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9145,"journal":{"name":"Brain Structure & Function","volume":" ","pages":"1327-1348"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Structure & Function","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-024-02804-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Children often show cognitive and affective traits that are similar to their parents. Although this indicates a transmission of phenotypes from parents to children, little is known about the neural underpinnings of that transmission. Here, we provide a general overview of neuroimaging studies that explore the similarity between parents and children in terms of brain structure and function. We notably discuss the aims, designs, and methods of these so-called intergenerational neuroimaging studies, focusing on two main designs: the parent-child design and the multigenerational design. For each design, we also summarize the major findings, identify the sources of variability between studies, and highlight some limitations and future directions. We argue that the lack of consensus in defining the parent-child transmission of brain structure and function leads to measurement heterogeneity, which is a challenge for future studies. Additionally, multigenerational studies often use measures of family resemblance to estimate the proportion of variance attributed to genetic versus environmental factors, though this estimate is likely inflated given the frequent lack of control for shared environment. Nonetheless, intergenerational neuroimaging studies may still have both clinical and theoretical relevance, not because they currently inform about the etiology of neuromarkers, but rather because they may help identify neuromarkers and test hypotheses about neuromarkers coming from more standard neuroimaging designs.

Abstract Image

人类大脑结构和功能的代际传递:对设计、方法和研究结果的叙述性回顾。
儿童经常表现出与父母相似的认知和情感特征。虽然这表明父母的表型会遗传给子女,但人们对这种遗传的神经基础知之甚少。在此,我们将对探讨父母与子女在大脑结构和功能方面相似性的神经成像研究进行综述。我们主要讨论了这些所谓代际神经影像学研究的目的、设计和方法,重点关注两种主要设计:亲子设计和多代设计。针对每种设计,我们还总结了主要发现,找出了研究之间的差异来源,并强调了一些局限性和未来的研究方向。我们认为,在定义大脑结构和功能的亲子传递方面缺乏共识导致了测量的异质性,这对未来的研究是一个挑战。此外,多代研究通常使用家族相似度的测量方法来估算遗传因素与环境因素的变异比例,但由于经常缺乏对共同环境的控制,这种估算很可能被夸大。尽管如此,代际神经影像学研究可能仍然具有临床和理论意义,这并不是因为它们目前可以提供神经标志物的病因学信息,而是因为它们可以帮助识别神经标志物,并检验来自更标准的神经影像学设计的神经标志物假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Structure & Function
Brain Structure & Function 医学-解剖学与形态学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.50%
发文量
168
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: Brain Structure & Function publishes research that provides insight into brain structure−function relationships. Studies published here integrate data spanning from molecular, cellular, developmental, and systems architecture to the neuroanatomy of behavior and cognitive functions. Manuscripts with focus on the spinal cord or the peripheral nervous system are not accepted for publication. Manuscripts with focus on diseases, animal models of diseases, or disease-related mechanisms are only considered for publication, if the findings provide novel insight into the organization and mechanisms of normal brain structure and function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信