Comparison of Preemptive Effect of Intravenous Ketorolac Versus Nalbuphine on Postoperative Shivering and Pain in Patients Undergoing Surgery Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study.

Q3 Medicine
Aleesha Gupta, Rajesh Angral, Sanjay Kumar Kalsotra, Heena Saini, Anshuman Mahesh Chander
{"title":"Comparison of Preemptive Effect of Intravenous Ketorolac Versus Nalbuphine on Postoperative Shivering and Pain in Patients Undergoing Surgery Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study.","authors":"Aleesha Gupta, Rajesh Angral, Sanjay Kumar Kalsotra, Heena Saini, Anshuman Mahesh Chander","doi":"10.6859/aja.202312_61(4).0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative pain and postanesthesia shivering are the two common problems in patients undergoing surgery under spinal anesthesia (SA). The present study aimed to compare the preemptive prescription of the single dose of intravenous (IV) ketorolac versus nalbuphine on postoperative shivering and pain in patients undergoing surgery under SA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Present study was a prospective, randomized double-blind study, conducted on patients of either gender, with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I or II, aged 21-60 years, posted for elective lower abdominal surgeries under SA. Patients were randomized by computer-generated random numbers into two groups of 50 patients each: group N (received 0.2 mg/kg nalbuphine IV) and group K (received 0.5 mg/kg ketorolac IV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of postoperative shivering was 22 % and 36 % in groups N and K respectively and the difference was statistically significant. The first request for analgesia (minutes) was later in group N (295.17 ± 54.62) than in group K (223.80 ± 15.34) and the difference was statistically significant. Increased total analgesic consumption was noted more in group K (131.34 ± 43.27) than in group N (79.23 ± 21.34), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). The incidence of side effects was comparable among both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preemptive nalbuphine had less incidence of postoperative shivering, delayed first request for analgesia, and less total analgesic consumption than ketorolac in patients undergoing surgery under SA.</p>","PeriodicalId":8482,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of anesthesiology","volume":"61 4","pages":"161-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6859/aja.202312_61(4).0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postoperative pain and postanesthesia shivering are the two common problems in patients undergoing surgery under spinal anesthesia (SA). The present study aimed to compare the preemptive prescription of the single dose of intravenous (IV) ketorolac versus nalbuphine on postoperative shivering and pain in patients undergoing surgery under SA.

Methods: Present study was a prospective, randomized double-blind study, conducted on patients of either gender, with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I or II, aged 21-60 years, posted for elective lower abdominal surgeries under SA. Patients were randomized by computer-generated random numbers into two groups of 50 patients each: group N (received 0.2 mg/kg nalbuphine IV) and group K (received 0.5 mg/kg ketorolac IV).

Results: The incidence of postoperative shivering was 22 % and 36 % in groups N and K respectively and the difference was statistically significant. The first request for analgesia (minutes) was later in group N (295.17 ± 54.62) than in group K (223.80 ± 15.34) and the difference was statistically significant. Increased total analgesic consumption was noted more in group K (131.34 ± 43.27) than in group N (79.23 ± 21.34), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). The incidence of side effects was comparable among both groups.

Conclusion: Preemptive nalbuphine had less incidence of postoperative shivering, delayed first request for analgesia, and less total analgesic consumption than ketorolac in patients undergoing surgery under SA.

静脉注射酮咯酸与纳布啡对脊柱麻醉手术患者术后哆嗦和疼痛的预防效果比较:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。
背景:术后疼痛和麻醉后颤抖是脊髓麻醉(SA)手术患者常见的两个问题。本研究旨在比较单剂量静脉注射酮咯酸与纳布啡对脊麻手术患者术后哆嗦和疼痛的影响:本研究是一项前瞻性、随机双盲研究,对象为美国麻醉医师协会体能状况 I 级或 II 级、年龄 21-60 岁、在 SA 下接受择期下腹部手术的男女患者。患者通过计算机生成的随机数字被随机分为两组,每组 50 人:N 组(接受 0.2 毫克/千克纳布啡静脉注射)和 K 组(接受 0.5 毫克/千克酮咯酸静脉注射):结果:N组和K组的术后颤抖发生率分别为22%和36%,差异具有统计学意义。N 组首次要求镇痛的时间(295.17 ± 54.62 分钟)晚于 K 组(223.80 ± 15.34 分钟),差异有统计学意义。K 组(131.34 ± 43.27)比 N 组(79.23 ± 21.34)的镇痛药总用量增加更多,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.0001)。两组的副作用发生率相当:结论:与酮咯酸相比,抢先使用纳布啡的 SA 手术患者术后哆嗦发生率更低、首次镇痛请求延迟时间更短、镇痛药总用量更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian journal of anesthesiology
Asian journal of anesthesiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of Anesthesiology (AJA), launched in 1962, is the official and peer-reviewed publication of the Taiwan Society of Anaesthesiologists. It is published quarterly (March/June/September/December) by Airiti and indexed in EMBASE, Medline, Scopus, ScienceDirect, SIIC Data Bases. AJA accepts submissions from around the world. AJA is the premier open access journal in the field of anaesthesia and its related disciplines of critical care and pain in Asia. The number of Chinese anaesthesiologists has reached more than 60,000 and is still growing. The journal aims to disseminate anaesthesiology research and services for the Chinese community and is now the main anaesthesiology journal for Chinese societies located in Taiwan, Mainland China, Hong Kong and Singapore. AJAcaters to clinicians of all relevant specialties and biomedical scientists working in the areas of anesthesia, critical care medicine and pain management, as well as other related fields (pharmacology, pathology molecular biology, etc). AJA''s editorial team is composed of local and regional experts in the field as well as many leading international experts. Article types accepted include review articles, research papers, short communication, correspondence and images.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信