Early Ambulation Following Lung Resection Surgery: Impact on Short-term Outcomes in Patients with Lung Cancer.

Physical therapy research Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1298/ptr.E10277
Kazunori Kurata, Yukio Nagata, Keisuke Oki, Keishi Ono, Tomohiro Miyake, Kaori Inui, Masashi Kobayashi
{"title":"Early Ambulation Following Lung Resection Surgery: Impact on Short-term Outcomes in Patients with Lung Cancer.","authors":"Kazunori Kurata, Yukio Nagata, Keisuke Oki, Keishi Ono, Tomohiro Miyake, Kaori Inui, Masashi Kobayashi","doi":"10.1298/ptr.E10277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Previous studies indicated that early ambulation following lung resection can prevent postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). However, some patients fail to achieve early ambulation owing to factors such as postoperative nausea, vomiting, or pain, particularly on postoperative day 1. This study aimed to address the critical clinical question: Is ambulation for ≥10 m during initial pulmonary rehabilitation necessary after lung resection surgery?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational cohort study included 407 patients who underwent lung resection surgery for lung cancer between January 2021 and December 2022. Twelve patients with a performance status of ≥2 and 21 patients lacking pulmonary rehabilitation prescriptions were excluded. Patients were categorized into the \"early ambulation\" group, which included individuals ambulating ≥10 m during rehabilitation on the first postoperative day, and the \"delayed ambulation\" group. The primary outcome was PPC incidence, with secondary outcomes encompassing pleural drain duration, hospital length of stay, and Δ6-minute walk distance (Δ6MWD: postoperative 6MWD minus preoperative 6MWD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The early and delayed ambulation groups comprised 315 and 59 patients, respectively. Significant disparities were noted in the length of hospital stay (7 [6-9] days vs. 8 [6-11] days, P = 0.01), pleural drainage duration (4 [3-5] days vs. 4 [3-6] days, P = 0.02), and Δ6MWD (-70 m vs. -100 m, P = 0.04). However, no significant difference was observed in PPC incidence (20.6% vs. 32.2%, P = 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ambulation for ≥10 m during initial pulmonary rehabilitation after lung resection surgery may yield short-term benefits as evidenced by improvements in various outcomes. However, it may not significantly affect the PPC incidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":74445,"journal":{"name":"Physical therapy research","volume":"27 1","pages":"42-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11057388/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical therapy research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1298/ptr.E10277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Previous studies indicated that early ambulation following lung resection can prevent postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). However, some patients fail to achieve early ambulation owing to factors such as postoperative nausea, vomiting, or pain, particularly on postoperative day 1. This study aimed to address the critical clinical question: Is ambulation for ≥10 m during initial pulmonary rehabilitation necessary after lung resection surgery?

Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study included 407 patients who underwent lung resection surgery for lung cancer between January 2021 and December 2022. Twelve patients with a performance status of ≥2 and 21 patients lacking pulmonary rehabilitation prescriptions were excluded. Patients were categorized into the "early ambulation" group, which included individuals ambulating ≥10 m during rehabilitation on the first postoperative day, and the "delayed ambulation" group. The primary outcome was PPC incidence, with secondary outcomes encompassing pleural drain duration, hospital length of stay, and Δ6-minute walk distance (Δ6MWD: postoperative 6MWD minus preoperative 6MWD).

Results: The early and delayed ambulation groups comprised 315 and 59 patients, respectively. Significant disparities were noted in the length of hospital stay (7 [6-9] days vs. 8 [6-11] days, P = 0.01), pleural drainage duration (4 [3-5] days vs. 4 [3-6] days, P = 0.02), and Δ6MWD (-70 m vs. -100 m, P = 0.04). However, no significant difference was observed in PPC incidence (20.6% vs. 32.2%, P = 0.06).

Conclusions: Ambulation for ≥10 m during initial pulmonary rehabilitation after lung resection surgery may yield short-term benefits as evidenced by improvements in various outcomes. However, it may not significantly affect the PPC incidence.

肺切除手术后的早期活动:对肺癌患者短期疗效的影响。
研究目的以往的研究表明,肺切除术后尽早下床活动可预防术后肺部并发症(PPCs)。然而,由于术后恶心、呕吐或疼痛等因素,尤其是在术后第 1 天,一些患者无法实现早期行走。本研究旨在解决这一关键的临床问题:肺切除手术后是否有必要在初始肺康复过程中步行≥10 米?这项回顾性观察队列研究纳入了 407 名在 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间接受肺切除手术的肺癌患者。排除了12名表现状态≥2的患者和21名没有肺康复处方的患者。患者被分为 "早期活动 "组和 "延迟活动 "组,"早期活动 "组包括术后第一天康复期间活动距离≥10米的患者。主要结果是PPC发生率,次要结果包括胸膜引流时间、住院时间和Δ6分钟步行距离(Δ6MWD:术后6MWD减去术前6MWD):结果:早期和延迟下床组分别有 315 名和 59 名患者。住院时间(7 [6-9] 天 vs. 8 [6-11] 天,P = 0.01)、胸膜引流时间(4 [3-5] 天 vs. 4 [3-6] 天,P = 0.02)和Δ6MWD(-70 m vs. -100 m,P = 0.04)存在显著差异。然而,PPC发生率无明显差异(20.6% vs. 32.2%,P = 0.06):结论:在肺切除手术后的初始肺康复过程中,下地行走≥10 米可能会带来短期益处,各种结果的改善就是证明。结论:在肺切除手术后的初始肺康复过程中,行走≥10 米可能会带来短期益处,这可以通过改善各种结果来证明,但这可能不会明显影响 PPC 的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信