A Synthesized Model for Applying Stress Management and Biofeedback Interventions in Research Utilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Q2 Medicine

Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-02-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2174/0117450179276691231229071003

Manyat Ruchiwit, Sararud Vuthiarpa, Kampol Ruchiwit, Kasorn Muijeen, Kanjanee Phanphairoj

{"title":"A Synthesized Model for Applying Stress Management and Biofeedback Interventions in Research Utilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Manyat Ruchiwit, Sararud Vuthiarpa, Kampol Ruchiwit, Kasorn Muijeen, Kanjanee Phanphairoj","doi":"10.2174/0117450179276691231229071003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Stress management and biofeedback interventions have been shown to be effective in improving mental and physical health outcomes. However, previous research studies and synthesized models for applying these interventions in research utilization are insufficient.Objective: This study aimed to synthesize a model for applying stress management and biofeedback interventions in research utilization.Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines.Multiple studies were used to assess the effectiveness of applying stress management and biofeedback interventions published from 2017 to 2023. The process included identifying the research questions, conducting a comprehensive literature search, assessing study quality, extracting data, synthesizing the data, analyzing and interpreting the findings, drawing conclusions, and making recommendations.Results: The results indicated a significant mean effect size without evidence of publication bias. The effect sizes of the subgroups among the study variables were not significantly different [Q = 4.02, p = .26]. However, there were significant differences regarding the mean effect sizes among the studies [Q = 63.59, p < .001] and also in terms of the test of subgroups among the participants [Q = 8.49, p = .04].Conclusion: The results emphasize the importance of evidence-based practice and highlight the need for ongoing evaluation and refinement of interventions. The proposed model was supported by related theories and research studies in order to ensure the robustness and reliability to guide practice and future research in the field of biofeedback interventions. By following this model, researchers and practitioners can ensure that stress management and biofeedback interventions are evidence-based and are effective in improving mental and physical health outcomes.","PeriodicalId":35447,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11037511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0117450179276691231229071003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stress management and biofeedback interventions have been shown to be effective in improving mental and physical health outcomes. However, previous research studies and synthesized models for applying these interventions in research utilization are insufficient.

Objective: This study aimed to synthesize a model for applying stress management and biofeedback interventions in research utilization.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines.Multiple studies were used to assess the effectiveness of applying stress management and biofeedback interventions published from 2017 to 2023. The process included identifying the research questions, conducting a comprehensive literature search, assessing study quality, extracting data, synthesizing the data, analyzing and interpreting the findings, drawing conclusions, and making recommendations.

Results: The results indicated a significant mean effect size without evidence of publication bias. The effect sizes of the subgroups among the study variables were not significantly different [Q = 4.02, p = .26]. However, there were significant differences regarding the mean effect sizes among the studies [Q = 63.59, p < .001] and also in terms of the test of subgroups among the participants [Q = 8.49, p = .04].

Conclusion: The results emphasize the importance of evidence-based practice and highlight the need for ongoing evaluation and refinement of interventions. The proposed model was supported by related theories and research studies in order to ensure the robustness and reliability to guide practice and future research in the field of biofeedback interventions. By following this model, researchers and practitioners can ensure that stress management and biofeedback interventions are evidence-based and are effective in improving mental and physical health outcomes.

查看原文本刊更多论文

在研究利用中应用压力管理和生物反馈干预的综合模型：系统回顾与元分析》。

背景：压力管理和生物反馈干预已被证明能有效改善身心健康。然而，以往的研究成果以及在研究利用中应用这些干预措施的综合模式并不充分：本研究旨在总结在研究利用中应用压力管理和生物反馈干预的模式：根据PRISMA指南进行了系统综述和荟萃分析，采用多项研究来评估2017年至2023年发表的压力管理和生物反馈干预措施的应用效果。研究过程包括确定研究问题、进行全面文献检索、评估研究质量、提取数据、综合数据、分析和解释研究结果、得出结论并提出建议：结果表明，平均效应大小显著，无发表偏倚证据。研究变量之间的亚组效应大小差异不大[Q = 4.02，P = .26]。然而，各研究之间的平均效应大小存在显著差异[Q = 63.59，p .001]，在参与者的亚组检验方面也存在显著差异[Q = 8.49，p = .04]：研究结果强调了循证实践的重要性，并突出了对干预措施进行持续评估和改进的必要性。提出的模型得到了相关理论和研究的支持，以确保其稳健性和可靠性，从而指导生物反馈干预领域的实践和未来研究。通过遵循这一模式，研究人员和从业人员可以确保压力管理和生物反馈干预措施以证据为基础，并能有效改善身心健康状况。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health

CiteScore

5.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health is an open access online journal, which publishes Research articles, Reviews, Letters in all areas of clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health covering the following topics: Clinical and epidemiological research in psychiatry and mental health; diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of mental health conditions; and frequencies and determinants of mental health conditions in the community and the populations at risk; research and economic aspects of psychiatry, with special attention given to manuscripts presenting new results and methods in the area; and clinical epidemiologic investigation of pharmaceutical agents. Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health, a peer reviewed journal, aims to provide the most complete and reliable source of information on current developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality articles rapidly and freely available worldwide.