Assessing protein and albumin recovery rates in different ascites filtration membrane washing methods for cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy.

Fujita Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-15 DOI:10.20407/fmj.2023-005
Sachie Yamada, Norio Nii, Atsushi Ohashi, Midori Hasegawa, Yukio Yuzawa, Naotake Tsuboi
{"title":"Assessing protein and albumin recovery rates in different ascites filtration membrane washing methods for cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy.","authors":"Sachie Yamada, Norio Nii, Atsushi Ohashi, Midori Hasegawa, Yukio Yuzawa, Naotake Tsuboi","doi":"10.20407/fmj.2023-005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (CART), the protein recovery rate decreases when the filtration membrane gets clogged. Employing a device with a filtration membrane washing feature prevents clogging, but it leads to the loss of ascites within the filter, resulting in reduced protein recovery. This study employed a device with a membrane washing function to investigate the relationship between protein recovery rate and the quantity of washing solution used, depending on the selected washing method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed cases of CART conducted at Fujita Health University Hospital between May 2021 and November 2022. The cases were divided and compared between two groups: one using flush and rinse as the washing method (flush+rinse group) and another using only flushing (flush group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified nine cases and 16 sessions. In the flush+rinse group, the median amount of washing solution used per membrane washing was 259 mL per cycle, whereas it was 54 mL per cycle in the flush group. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.0001). The median total protein recovery rate was 53.8% for the flush+rinse group and 78.8% for the flush group, with the latter showing a significantly higher value (p=0.0199).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In CART using a membrane washing function, adopting a washing method that reduces the amount of washing solution leads to an increase in the total protein recovery rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":33657,"journal":{"name":"Fujita Medical Journal","volume":"10 2","pages":"53-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11063573/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fujita Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20407/fmj.2023-005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (CART), the protein recovery rate decreases when the filtration membrane gets clogged. Employing a device with a filtration membrane washing feature prevents clogging, but it leads to the loss of ascites within the filter, resulting in reduced protein recovery. This study employed a device with a membrane washing function to investigate the relationship between protein recovery rate and the quantity of washing solution used, depending on the selected washing method.

Methods: We analyzed cases of CART conducted at Fujita Health University Hospital between May 2021 and November 2022. The cases were divided and compared between two groups: one using flush and rinse as the washing method (flush+rinse group) and another using only flushing (flush group).

Results: We identified nine cases and 16 sessions. In the flush+rinse group, the median amount of washing solution used per membrane washing was 259 mL per cycle, whereas it was 54 mL per cycle in the flush group. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.0001). The median total protein recovery rate was 53.8% for the flush+rinse group and 78.8% for the flush group, with the latter showing a significantly higher value (p=0.0199).

Conclusions: In CART using a membrane washing function, adopting a washing method that reduces the amount of washing solution leads to an increase in the total protein recovery rate.

评估无细胞和浓缩腹水再灌注疗法中不同腹水滤膜洗涤方法的蛋白质和白蛋白回收率。
目的:在无细胞和浓缩腹水再灌注疗法(CART)中,过滤膜一旦堵塞,蛋白质回收率就会降低。使用具有过滤膜清洗功能的设备可以防止堵塞,但会导致腹水在过滤器内流失,从而降低蛋白质回收率。本研究采用具有膜清洗功能的设备,根据所选的清洗方法,研究蛋白质回收率与清洗液用量之间的关系:我们分析了 2021 年 5 月至 2022 年 11 月期间在藤田保健大学医院进行的 CART 病例。将病例分为两组并进行比较:一组使用冲洗和冲洗作为清洗方法(冲洗+冲洗组),另一组仅使用冲洗方法(冲洗组):结果:我们确定了 9 个病例和 16 个疗程。在冲洗+冲洗组中,每次膜清洗所用清洗液的中位数为 259 毫升/周期,而在冲洗组中,每次清洗所用清洗液的中位数为 54 毫升/周期。这一差异具有统计学意义(p结论:在使用膜清洗功能的 CART 中,采用减少清洗液用量的清洗方法可提高蛋白质总回收率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信