Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device: a systematic review.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-15 DOI:10.5114/aic.2024.136406
Jakub Maksym, Marcin Grabowski, Tomasz Mazurek
{"title":"Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device: a systematic review.","authors":"Jakub Maksym, Marcin Grabowski, Tomasz Mazurek","doi":"10.5114/aic.2024.136406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most commonly observed arrhythmia in the world and its prevalence increases with age. The main and most severe complication of AF is ischemic stroke. Oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy is the standard of care for stroke prevention in the high risk population. Initiation of this treatment is associated with a substantial risk of bleeding complications. Moreover, there is a group of patients who cannot tolerate OAC. In patients with AF the left atrial appendage (LAA) is the main source of thrombus formation. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has become an important non-pharmacological intervention for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular AF. The procedure aims to reduce the risk of thromboembolism without increasing the risk of bleeding. Over the last few years, the safety and long-term efficacy of the procedure in specific populations have increased and more patients are being treated. The Watchman device is the most studied device in this field. Randomized controlled trials demonstrated non-inferiority of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using the WATCHMAN 2.5 device to OAC (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA). The new generation device, WATCHMAN FLX, was introduced and its use was associated with fewer safety events and a higher success rate of effective appendage closure. Nevertheless, several unsolved problems remain, including device-related thrombosis, the post-LAAC antithrombotic regimen, and peri-device leakage. This review will focus on LAAC with the Watchman device for stroke prevention in AF patients. Current status, available literature, clinical safety and efficacy will be summarized.</p>","PeriodicalId":49678,"journal":{"name":"Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej","volume":"20 1","pages":"18-29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11008520/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2024.136406","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most commonly observed arrhythmia in the world and its prevalence increases with age. The main and most severe complication of AF is ischemic stroke. Oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy is the standard of care for stroke prevention in the high risk population. Initiation of this treatment is associated with a substantial risk of bleeding complications. Moreover, there is a group of patients who cannot tolerate OAC. In patients with AF the left atrial appendage (LAA) is the main source of thrombus formation. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has become an important non-pharmacological intervention for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular AF. The procedure aims to reduce the risk of thromboembolism without increasing the risk of bleeding. Over the last few years, the safety and long-term efficacy of the procedure in specific populations have increased and more patients are being treated. The Watchman device is the most studied device in this field. Randomized controlled trials demonstrated non-inferiority of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using the WATCHMAN 2.5 device to OAC (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA). The new generation device, WATCHMAN FLX, was introduced and its use was associated with fewer safety events and a higher success rate of effective appendage closure. Nevertheless, several unsolved problems remain, including device-related thrombosis, the post-LAAC antithrombotic regimen, and peri-device leakage. This review will focus on LAAC with the Watchman device for stroke prevention in AF patients. Current status, available literature, clinical safety and efficacy will be summarized.

使用 Watchman 装置经皮关闭左心房阑尾:系统性综述。
心房颤动(房颤)是世界上最常见的心律失常,其发病率随着年龄的增长而增加。房颤最主要、最严重的并发症是缺血性中风。口服抗凝疗法(OAC)是高危人群预防中风的标准疗法。开始这种治疗与出血并发症的巨大风险相关。此外,还有一部分患者不能耐受 OAC。在房颤患者中,左心房阑尾(LAA)是血栓形成的主要来源。经皮左心房阑尾封堵术(LAAC)已成为预防非瓣膜性房颤患者中风的重要非药物干预措施。该手术旨在降低血栓栓塞风险,同时不增加出血风险。在过去几年中,该手术在特定人群中的安全性和长期疗效得到了提高,越来越多的患者接受了治疗。Watchman 装置是该领域研究最多的装置。随机对照试验表明,使用 WATCHMAN 2.5 设备经皮关闭左心房阑尾的效果不劣于 OAC(波士顿科学公司,美国马萨诸塞州马尔伯勒)。新一代设备 WATCHMAN FLX 问世后,使用该设备发生的安全事件更少,有效关闭阑尾的成功率更高。尽管如此,仍有一些问题尚未解决,包括与器械相关的血栓形成、LAAC 后的抗血栓治疗以及器械周围渗漏。本综述将重点讨论使用 Watchman 装置进行 LAAC 以预防房颤患者中风的问题。将对其现状、现有文献、临床安全性和有效性进行总结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej
Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej/Advances in Interventional Cardiology is indexed in: Index Copernicus, Ministry of Science and Higher Education Index (MNiSW). Advances in Interventional Cardiology is a quarterly aimed at specialists, mainly at cardiologists and cardiosurgeons. Official journal of the Association on Cardiovascular Interventions of the Polish Cardiac Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信