Considering the cellular landscape in marrow stimulation techniques for cartilage repair.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Maddie Hasson, Lorenzo M Fernandes, Hanna Solomon, Tristan Pepper, Nicholas L Huffman, Saitheja A Pucha, Jason T Bariteau, Jarred M Kaiser, Jay M Patel
{"title":"Considering the cellular landscape in marrow stimulation techniques for cartilage repair.","authors":"Maddie Hasson, Lorenzo M Fernandes, Hanna Solomon, Tristan Pepper, Nicholas L Huffman, Saitheja A Pucha, Jason T Bariteau, Jarred M Kaiser, Jay M Patel","doi":"10.1159/000538530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Marrow stimulation is a common reparative approach to treat injuries to cartilage and other soft tissues (e.g., rotator cuff). It involves the recruitment of bone marrow elements and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) into the defect, theoretically initiating a regenerative process. However, the resulting repair tissue is often weak and susceptible to deterioration with time. The populations of cells at the marrow stimulation site (beyond MSCs), and their contribution to inflammation, vascularity, and fibrosis, may play a role in quality of the repair tissue.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>In this review, we accomplish three goals: 1) systematically review clinical trials on the augmentation of marrow stimulation and evaluate their assumptions on the biological elements recruited; 2) detail the cellular populations in bone marrow and their impact on healing; and 3) highlight emerging technologies and approaches that could better guide these specific cell populations towards enhanced cartilage or soft tissue formation.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>We found that most clinical trials do not account for cell heterogeneity, nor do they specify the regenerative element recruited, and those that do typically utilize descriptions such as \"clots\", \"elements\", and \"blood\". Furthermore, our review of bone marrow cell populations demonstrates a dramatically heterogenous cell population, including hematopoietic cells, immune cells, fibroblasts, macrophages, and only a small population of MSCs. Finally, the field has developed numerous innovative techniques to enhance the chondrogenic potential (and reduce the anti-regenerative impacts) of these various cell types. We hope this review will guide approaches that account for cellular heterogeneity and improve marrow stimulation techniques to treat chondral defects.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Marrow stimulation is a common reparative approach to treat injuries to cartilage and other soft tissues (e.g., rotator cuff). It involves the recruitment of bone marrow elements and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) into the defect, theoretically initiating a regenerative process. However, the resulting repair tissue is often weak and susceptible to deterioration with time. The populations of cells at the marrow stimulation site (beyond MSCs), and their contribution to inflammation, vascularity, and fibrosis, may play a role in quality of the repair tissue.

Summary: In this review, we accomplish three goals: 1) systematically review clinical trials on the augmentation of marrow stimulation and evaluate their assumptions on the biological elements recruited; 2) detail the cellular populations in bone marrow and their impact on healing; and 3) highlight emerging technologies and approaches that could better guide these specific cell populations towards enhanced cartilage or soft tissue formation.

Key messages: We found that most clinical trials do not account for cell heterogeneity, nor do they specify the regenerative element recruited, and those that do typically utilize descriptions such as "clots", "elements", and "blood". Furthermore, our review of bone marrow cell populations demonstrates a dramatically heterogenous cell population, including hematopoietic cells, immune cells, fibroblasts, macrophages, and only a small population of MSCs. Finally, the field has developed numerous innovative techniques to enhance the chondrogenic potential (and reduce the anti-regenerative impacts) of these various cell types. We hope this review will guide approaches that account for cellular heterogeneity and improve marrow stimulation techniques to treat chondral defects.

考虑用于软骨修复的骨髓刺激技术中的细胞状况。
背景:骨髓刺激是治疗软骨和其他软组织损伤(如肩袖)的一种常见修复方法。它包括将骨髓元素和间充质干细胞(MSCs)招募到缺损处,理论上可启动再生过程。然而,由此产生的修复组织往往比较脆弱,随着时间的推移容易退化。骨髓刺激部位的细胞群(间充质干细胞除外)及其对炎症、血管和纤维化的贡献,可能对修复组织的质量起到一定作用:1)系统回顾有关骨髓刺激增强的临床试验,并评估其对所招募生物元素的假设;2)详细介绍骨髓中的细胞群及其对愈合的影响;3)重点介绍可更好地引导这些特定细胞群增强软骨或软组织形成的新兴技术和方法:我们发现,大多数临床试验并未考虑细胞的异质性,也未明确说明所招募的再生元素,而那些明确说明的临床试验通常使用 "凝块"、"元素 "和 "血液 "等描述。此外,我们对骨髓细胞群的研究表明,骨髓细胞群的异质性非常高,包括造血细胞、免疫细胞、成纤维细胞、巨噬细胞,只有少量间充质干细胞。最后,该领域已开发出许多创新技术,以增强这些不同类型细胞的软骨生成潜能(并减少抗再生影响)。我们希望这篇综述能为考虑细胞异质性和改进骨髓刺激技术治疗软骨缺损的方法提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信