In-silico prediction of dislodgeable foliar residues and regulatory implications for plant protection products.

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Yi Shi, Kanak Choudhury, Xiaoyi Sopko, Sarah Adham, Edward Chikwana
{"title":"In-silico prediction of dislodgeable foliar residues and regulatory implications for plant protection products.","authors":"Yi Shi, Kanak Choudhury, Xiaoyi Sopko, Sarah Adham, Edward Chikwana","doi":"10.1038/s41370-024-00675-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>When experimentally determined dislodgeable foliar residue (DFR) values are not available, regulatory agencies use conservative default DFR values as a first-tier approach to assess post-application dermal exposures to plant protection products (PPPs). These default values are based on a limited set of field studies, are very conservative, and potentially overestimate exposures from DFRs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Use Random Forest to develop classification and regression-type ensemble models to predict DFR values after last application (DFR0) by considering experimentally-based variability due to differences in physical and chemical properties of PPPs, agronomic practices, crop type, and climatic conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Random Forest algorithm was used to develop in-silico ensemble DFR0 prediction models using more than 100 DFR studies from Corteva Agriscience<sup>TM</sup>. Several variables related to the active ingredient (a.i.) that was applied, crop, and climate conditions at the time of last application were considered as model parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proposed ensemble models demonstrated 98% prediction accuracy that if a DFR0 is predicted to be less than the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) default DFR0 value of 3 µg/cm<sup>2</sup>/kg a.i./ha, it is highly indicative that the measured DFR value will be less than the default if the study is conducted. If a value is predicted to be larger than or equal to the EFSA default, the model has an 83% prediction accuracy.</p><p><strong>Impact statement: </strong>This manuscript is expected to have significant impact globally as it provides: A framework for incorporating in silico DFR data into worker exposure assessment, A roadmap for a tiered approach for conducting re-entry exposure assessment, and A proof of concept for using existing DFR data to provide a read-across framework that can easily be harmonized across all regulatory agencies to provide more robust assessments for PPP exposures.</p>","PeriodicalId":15684,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-024-00675-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: When experimentally determined dislodgeable foliar residue (DFR) values are not available, regulatory agencies use conservative default DFR values as a first-tier approach to assess post-application dermal exposures to plant protection products (PPPs). These default values are based on a limited set of field studies, are very conservative, and potentially overestimate exposures from DFRs.

Objective: Use Random Forest to develop classification and regression-type ensemble models to predict DFR values after last application (DFR0) by considering experimentally-based variability due to differences in physical and chemical properties of PPPs, agronomic practices, crop type, and climatic conditions.

Methods: Random Forest algorithm was used to develop in-silico ensemble DFR0 prediction models using more than 100 DFR studies from Corteva AgriscienceTM. Several variables related to the active ingredient (a.i.) that was applied, crop, and climate conditions at the time of last application were considered as model parameters.

Results: The proposed ensemble models demonstrated 98% prediction accuracy that if a DFR0 is predicted to be less than the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) default DFR0 value of 3 µg/cm2/kg a.i./ha, it is highly indicative that the measured DFR value will be less than the default if the study is conducted. If a value is predicted to be larger than or equal to the EFSA default, the model has an 83% prediction accuracy.

Impact statement: This manuscript is expected to have significant impact globally as it provides: A framework for incorporating in silico DFR data into worker exposure assessment, A roadmap for a tiered approach for conducting re-entry exposure assessment, and A proof of concept for using existing DFR data to provide a read-across framework that can easily be harmonized across all regulatory agencies to provide more robust assessments for PPP exposures.

Abstract Image

可脱落叶面残留物的硅内预测及对植保产品的监管影响。
背景:当无法获得实验确定的可剥落叶面残留物 (DFR) 值时,监管机构会使用保守的默认 DFR 值作为评估施用后皮肤接触植物保护产品 (PPP) 的第一级方法。这些默认值基于有限的实地研究,非常保守,可能会高估 DFR 的暴露量:使用随机森林开发分类和回归型集合模型,以预测最后一次施用(DFR0)后的 DFR 值,同时考虑到基于实验的变异性,这些变异性是由 PPPs 的物理和化学特性、农艺实践、作物类型和气候条件的差异造成的:方法:使用随机森林算法,利用 Corteva AgriscienceTM 提供的 100 多项 DFR 研究结果,建立室内 DFR0 预测模型。与施用的活性成分 (a.i.)、作物和最后一次施用时的气候条件有关的几个变量被视为模型参数:建议的集合模型显示,如果预测的 DFR0 小于欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)默认的 DFR0 值 3 µg/cm2/kg a.i./ha,则表明如果进行研究,测得的 DFR 值将小于默认值,预测准确率为 98%。如果预测值大于或等于 EFSA 默认值,则模型的预测准确率为 83%:本手稿预计将对全球产生重大影响,因为它提供了将硅学 DFR 数据纳入工人暴露评估的框架、进行再进入暴露评估的分层方法路线图,以及利用现有 DFR 数据提供一个可轻松在所有监管机构之间统一的可读框架的概念验证,从而为购买力平价暴露提供更稳健的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
93
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (JESEE) aims to be the premier and authoritative source of information on advances in exposure science for professionals in a wide range of environmental and public health disciplines. JESEE publishes original peer-reviewed research presenting significant advances in exposure science and exposure analysis, including development and application of the latest technologies for measuring exposures, and innovative computational approaches for translating novel data streams to characterize and predict exposures. The types of papers published in the research section of JESEE are original research articles, translation studies, and correspondence. Reported results should further understanding of the relationship between environmental exposure and human health, describe evaluated novel exposure science tools, or demonstrate potential of exposure science to enable decisions and actions that promote and protect human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信