Safety of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy in Critically Ill Patients with Liver Cirrhosis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
European Surgical Research Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-29 DOI:10.1159/000539106
Roee Noy, Flóra Macsi, Yotam Shkedy, Omri Simchon, Natalia Gvozdev, Danny Epstein
{"title":"Safety of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy in Critically Ill Patients with Liver Cirrhosis.","authors":"Roee Noy, Flóra Macsi, Yotam Shkedy, Omri Simchon, Natalia Gvozdev, Danny Epstein","doi":"10.1159/000539106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) is a safe and cost-effective alternative to surgical tracheostomy. Cirrhotic patients often require ICU admission and prolonged mechanical ventilation. Patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) are known to have coagulopathy and relatively safe and simple procedures such as tracheostomy may be associated with high complication rates, specifically high bleeding rates. Current guidelines are unable to make a specific recommendation on the safety of PDT among cirrhotic patients. We aimed to evaluate the safety of PDT in critically ill patients with LC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review identified critically ill patients who underwent PDT between January 2012 and March 2023. The study group was defined as all patients with a diagnosis of LC. The primary outcome was early (7-day) bleeding, categorized as minor or major. Secondary outcomes were PDT-related and 30-day all-cause mortality. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust the imbalances between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,628 were included in the analysis. Thirty-three of them (2.0%) had LC. In the LC group, only 1 patient (3.0%, 95% CI: 0.0-15.8%) developed early bleeding. Intra-operative, early, late bleeding, and PDT-related mortality rates did not differ significantly between those with LC and those without.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This retrospective cohort study indicates that PDT can be safely performed in critically ill cirrhotic patients, without significantly increasing the risk of bleeding complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":12222,"journal":{"name":"European Surgical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) is a safe and cost-effective alternative to surgical tracheostomy. Cirrhotic patients often require ICU admission and prolonged mechanical ventilation. Patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) are known to have coagulopathy and relatively safe and simple procedures such as tracheostomy may be associated with high complication rates, specifically high bleeding rates. Current guidelines are unable to make a specific recommendation on the safety of PDT among cirrhotic patients. We aimed to evaluate the safety of PDT in critically ill patients with LC.

Methods: A retrospective chart review identified critically ill patients who underwent PDT between January 2012 and March 2023. The study group was defined as all patients with a diagnosis of LC. The primary outcome was early (7-day) bleeding, categorized as minor or major. Secondary outcomes were PDT-related and 30-day all-cause mortality. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust the imbalances between the groups.

Results: A total of 1,628 were included in the analysis. Thirty-three of them (2.0%) had LC. In the LC group, only 1 patient (3.0%, 95% CI: 0.0-15.8%) developed early bleeding. Intra-operative, early, late bleeding, and PDT-related mortality rates did not differ significantly between those with LC and those without.

Conclusion: This retrospective cohort study indicates that PDT can be safely performed in critically ill cirrhotic patients, without significantly increasing the risk of bleeding complications.

肝硬化重症患者经皮扩张气管造口术的安全性
简介:经皮扩张气管造口术(PDT)是替代外科气管造口术的一种安全、经济的方法。肝硬化患者通常需要入住重症监护室并进行长时间的机械通气。众所周知,肝硬化(LC)患者存在凝血功能障碍,而气管造口术等相对安全、简单的手术可能会导致较高的并发症发生率,尤其是高出血率。目前的指南无法就肝硬化患者使用光动力疗法的安全性提出具体建议。我们的目的是评估肝硬化重症患者接受光动力疗法的安全性:通过回顾性病历审查,确定了在 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 3 月 3 日期间接受光动力疗法的重症患者。研究组定义为所有诊断为 LC 的患者。主要结果是早期(7 天)出血,分为轻微和严重出血。次要结果为 PDT 相关死亡率和 30 天全因死亡率。进行倾向评分匹配以调整组间的不平衡:共有1628人被纳入分析。其中 33 人(2.0%)患有 LC。在 LC 组中,只有一名患者(3.0%,95% CI 0.0%-15.8%)出现早期出血。有 LC 和没有 LC 的患者在术中、早期、晚期出血以及 PDT 相关死亡率方面没有显著差异:这项回顾性队列研究表明,肝硬化重症患者可以安全地实施 PDT,而不会显著增加出血并发症的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''European Surgical Research'' features original clinical and experimental papers, condensed reviews of new knowledge relevant to surgical research, and short technical notes serving the information needs of investigators in various fields of operative medicine. Coverage includes surgery, surgical pathophysiology, drug usage, and new surgical techniques. Special consideration is given to information on the use of animal models, physiological and biological methods as well as biophysical measuring and recording systems. The journal is of particular value for workers interested in pathophysiologic concepts, new techniques and in how these can be introduced into clinical work or applied when critical decisions are made concerning the use of new procedures or drugs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信