Ecological perspectives on female and male reproductive success with competition in two Serapias species.

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Joshua Borràs, Joana Cursach, Cayetano Herrera, Sebastià Perelló-Suau, Miquel Capó
{"title":"Ecological perspectives on female and male reproductive success with competition in two Serapias species.","authors":"Joshua Borràs, Joana Cursach, Cayetano Herrera, Sebastià Perelló-Suau, Miquel Capó","doi":"10.1093/aob/mcae074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The deceptive strategies by which orchids are pollinated and how these are capable of attracting pollinators remain understudied with regard to their implications for plant fitness. Despite their ecological importance, limited investigations have been conducted on sexual deception and shelter mimicry in orchid species, making this a compelling avenue in orchid biology research. To expand the knowledge of these reproductive mechanisms, we studied the pollination of Serapias lingua and S. parviflora in co-occurring and isolated sites in the Balearic Islands (Spain), further accentuated by the presence of a hybrid, indicating shared pollinators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed bagging and hand pollination experiments to examine the reproductive biology of the two species. Furthermore, we evaluated the influence of phenotypical and ecological factors on reproductive success, including biometric measurements, reproductive performance and neighbourhood diversity (co-flowering and pollinator communities).</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Reproductive mechanisms between these two orchid species exhibit substantial disparities. Serapias lingua relies primarily on insect-mediated pollination, while S. parviflora demonstrates self-reproduction capacity. Although events of open pollination are rare, hybridization occurs predominantly when S. lingua is the pollen donor. Fruit set in S. parviflora was positively correlated with plant height, while in S. lingua it was negatively associated with flower size. The coexistence of the two species positively affected pollinium removal in S. parviflora, but did not exert an influence on reproductive traits in S. lingua. Overall, biometric parameters were diminished in isolated compared with co-occurring sites. At the community level, the increased diversity of co-flowering species in the vicinity exhibited an inhibitory effect on pollinium removal in S. parviflora.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Under a context of pollinator loss or phenological mismatch between pollinator presence and flowering, the selfing capacity of S. parviflora would guarantee reproduction whereas S. lingua survival would be compromised. Furthers studies are needed to assess the effects of phenotypical and ecological factors on reproductive success of S. lingua in pollinator-decline scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":8023,"journal":{"name":"Annals of botany","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11232520/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcae074","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: The deceptive strategies by which orchids are pollinated and how these are capable of attracting pollinators remain understudied with regard to their implications for plant fitness. Despite their ecological importance, limited investigations have been conducted on sexual deception and shelter mimicry in orchid species, making this a compelling avenue in orchid biology research. To expand the knowledge of these reproductive mechanisms, we studied the pollination of Serapias lingua and S. parviflora in co-occurring and isolated sites in the Balearic Islands (Spain), further accentuated by the presence of a hybrid, indicating shared pollinators.

Methods: We employed bagging and hand pollination experiments to examine the reproductive biology of the two species. Furthermore, we evaluated the influence of phenotypical and ecological factors on reproductive success, including biometric measurements, reproductive performance and neighbourhood diversity (co-flowering and pollinator communities).

Key results: Reproductive mechanisms between these two orchid species exhibit substantial disparities. Serapias lingua relies primarily on insect-mediated pollination, while S. parviflora demonstrates self-reproduction capacity. Although events of open pollination are rare, hybridization occurs predominantly when S. lingua is the pollen donor. Fruit set in S. parviflora was positively correlated with plant height, while in S. lingua it was negatively associated with flower size. The coexistence of the two species positively affected pollinium removal in S. parviflora, but did not exert an influence on reproductive traits in S. lingua. Overall, biometric parameters were diminished in isolated compared with co-occurring sites. At the community level, the increased diversity of co-flowering species in the vicinity exhibited an inhibitory effect on pollinium removal in S. parviflora.

Conclusions: Under a context of pollinator loss or phenological mismatch between pollinator presence and flowering, the selfing capacity of S. parviflora would guarantee reproduction whereas S. lingua survival would be compromised. Furthers studies are needed to assess the effects of phenotypical and ecological factors on reproductive success of S. lingua in pollinator-decline scenarios.

从生态学角度看两种蛇尾鲈的雌性和雄性生殖成功与竞争。
兰花授粉的欺骗策略以及这些策略如何能够吸引传粉者,这些问题对植物适应性的影响仍未得到充分研究。尽管兰花具有重要的生态意义,但有关兰花物种的性欺骗和庇护模仿的研究却十分有限,这使其成为兰花生物学研究中一个引人注目的领域。为了扩大对这些繁殖机制的了解,我们研究了巴利阿里群岛(西班牙)上的Serapias lingua和S. parviflora在共生和隔离地点的授粉情况。我们采用了套袋和人工授粉实验来研究它们的繁殖生物学。此外,我们还评估了表型和生态因素对繁殖成功的影响,包括生物计量学测量、繁殖性能和邻域多样性(共同开花和授粉者群落)。这两种兰花的繁殖机制存在很大差异。Serapias lingua主要依靠昆虫授粉,而S. parviflora则具有自我繁殖能力。虽然开放授粉的情况很少见,但杂交主要发生在 S. lingua 作为花粉供体的情况下。S. parviflora 的坐果率与植株高度呈正相关,而 S. lingua 的坐果率与花朵大小呈负相关。两个物种的共存对伞形花序的花粉块清除产生了积极影响,但对耧斗菜的生殖特征没有影响。总体而言,与共生地点相比,孤立地点的生物计量参数较低。在群落水平上,附近共同开花物种多样性的增加对伞形花序的花粉去除有抑制作用。在传粉昆虫消失或传粉昆虫出现与开花之间的物候不匹配的情况下,S. parviflora 的自交能力将保证其繁殖,而 S. lingua 的生存则会受到影响。在传粉昆虫减少的情况下,表型和生态因素对 S. lingua 的繁殖成功率的影响还需要进一步研究评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of botany
Annals of botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
138
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Botany is an international plant science journal publishing novel and rigorous research in all areas of plant science. It is published monthly in both electronic and printed forms with at least two extra issues each year that focus on a particular theme in plant biology. The Journal is managed by the Annals of Botany Company, a not-for-profit educational charity established to promote plant science worldwide. The Journal publishes original research papers, invited and submitted review articles, ''Research in Context'' expanding on original work, ''Botanical Briefings'' as short overviews of important topics, and ''Viewpoints'' giving opinions. All papers in each issue are summarized briefly in Content Snapshots , there are topical news items in the Plant Cuttings section and Book Reviews . A rigorous review process ensures that readers are exposed to genuine and novel advances across a wide spectrum of botanical knowledge. All papers aim to advance knowledge and make a difference to our understanding of plant science.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信