Evaluation of different color measurement methods for determining tooth color.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ozden Melis Durmaz Yilmaz, Murat Tasyurek, Hasan Onder Gumus
{"title":"Evaluation of different color measurement methods for determining tooth color.","authors":"Ozden Melis Durmaz Yilmaz, Murat Tasyurek, Hasan Onder Gumus","doi":"10.3290/j.ijcd.b5290621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of this study is to develop software at a low cost that enables the detection of tooth colors by capturing photographs using various devices, and to compare its effectiveness with existing expensive methods.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 60 anterior central incisor teeth from 30 individuals were included in the study. The CIELAB values (L,a,b) of each tooth were measured using a spectrophotometer, which is considered the gold standard. Subsequently, photographs of the teeth were taken using four different smartphones (iPhone- Xiaomi) and one digital camera (Canon). These images were then subjected to image processing techniques and compared with measurements obtained through computer-based analysis in order to assess the correlation. Data with three or more groups, the Kruskal-Wallis H test was utilized, and multiple comparisons were conducted using the Dunn test. A significance level of p<0.05 was considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Upon examining the results of multiple comparisons, a statistically significant difference was observed (p<0.001) between the DeltaE values obtained from the camera of the iPhone and those obtained from the Canon DSLR and Xiaomi cameras. The iPhone cameras yielded result values ranging from 2.68 to 2.90 for DeltaE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is reported that color determination methods based on image processing of photographs taken with iPhone mobile phones could potentially gain an advantageous position in routine clinical practice, as compared to spectrophotometry.</p>","PeriodicalId":48666,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ijcd.b5290621","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study is to develop software at a low cost that enables the detection of tooth colors by capturing photographs using various devices, and to compare its effectiveness with existing expensive methods.

Material and methods: A total of 60 anterior central incisor teeth from 30 individuals were included in the study. The CIELAB values (L,a,b) of each tooth were measured using a spectrophotometer, which is considered the gold standard. Subsequently, photographs of the teeth were taken using four different smartphones (iPhone- Xiaomi) and one digital camera (Canon). These images were then subjected to image processing techniques and compared with measurements obtained through computer-based analysis in order to assess the correlation. Data with three or more groups, the Kruskal-Wallis H test was utilized, and multiple comparisons were conducted using the Dunn test. A significance level of p<0.05 was considered.

Results: Upon examining the results of multiple comparisons, a statistically significant difference was observed (p<0.001) between the DeltaE values obtained from the camera of the iPhone and those obtained from the Canon DSLR and Xiaomi cameras. The iPhone cameras yielded result values ranging from 2.68 to 2.90 for DeltaE.

Conclusions: It is reported that color determination methods based on image processing of photographs taken with iPhone mobile phones could potentially gain an advantageous position in routine clinical practice, as compared to spectrophotometry.

评估用于确定牙齿颜色的不同颜色测量方法。
目的:本研究的目的是开发一种低成本的软件,通过使用各种设备拍摄照片来检测牙齿颜色,并比较其与现有昂贵方法的有效性:研究共包括来自 30 个人的 60 颗前中切牙。使用被视为黄金标准的分光光度计测量每颗牙齿的 CIELAB 值(L、a、b)。随后,使用四款不同的智能手机(iPhone-小米)和一款数码相机(佳能)拍摄了牙齿照片。然后对这些图像进行图像处理技术处理,并与通过计算机分析获得的测量结果进行比较,以评估相关性。对于三组或三组以上的数据,采用 Kruskal-Wallis H 检验,多重比较采用 Dunn 检验。结果的显著性水平为 p:在对多重比较结果进行检验后,观察到了统计学上的显著差异(pConclusions):据报道,与分光光度法相比,基于 iPhone 手机拍摄的照片图像处理的颜色测定方法有可能在常规临床实践中占据有利地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Computerized Dentistry
International Journal of Computerized Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: This journal explores the myriad innovations in the emerging field of computerized dentistry and how to integrate them into clinical practice. The bulk of the journal is devoted to the science of computer-assisted dentistry, with research articles and clinical reports on all aspects of computer-based diagnostic and therapeutic applications, with special emphasis placed on CAD/CAM and image-processing systems. Articles also address the use of computer-based communication to support patient care, assess the quality of care, and enhance clinical decision making. The journal is presented in a bilingual format, with each issue offering three types of articles: science-based, application-based, and national society reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信